Skip to content

Recent trends in acupuncture for chronic pain: A bibliometric analysis and review of the literature

Huang et al. · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · 2023

📊Bibliometric Analysis📚n=1,616 studies analyzed🌏Global Review

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
5/5
Replication
3/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the characteristics, trends, and frontiers of global scientific research on acupuncture for chronic pain over the past decade

👥

WHO

Researchers and scientific articles on acupuncture for chronic pain published between 2011-2022

⏱️

DURATION

11-year analysis (2011-2022)

📍

POINTS

Multiple points analyzed across the included studies, with a focus on electroacupuncture and traditional techniques

🔬 Study Design

1616participants
randomization

Original Articles

n=1091

clinical and experimental studies

Review Articles

n=351

systematic and narrative reviews

Other Types

n=174

letters, editorials, abstracts

⏱️ Duration: 11-year bibliometric analysis

📊 Results in numbers

0%

China leads in publications

70 to 227

Annual publication growth

0

Journals with greatest output

0

Contributing countries

Percentage highlights

37%
China leads in publications

📊 Outcome Comparison

Publications by country

China
598
USA
173
South Korea
100
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that research on acupuncture for chronic pain has grown significantly in recent years, especially in China. The main research areas include neuropathic pain, knee osteoarthritis, and chronic low back pain, with a growing focus on brain connectivity and pain-associated depression.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Chronic pain represents one of the major global public health challenges, affecting approximately 28% of adults worldwide and costing healthcare systems hundreds of billions of dollars annually. Defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain as pain that persists for more than three months, often accompanied by emotional and functional disturbances, chronic pain significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Conventional drug treatment, especially with opioids, has serious limitations due to severe side effects, including physical dependence, tolerance, and overdose risk. In this context, acupuncture has emerged as a promising complementary therapy, demonstrating efficacy in relieving various types of chronic pain and potential to reduce opioid analgesic use.

Growing scientific interest in this area motivated the need for a comprehensive analysis of the research landscape on acupuncture for chronic pain.

This study aimed to map and analyze the characteristics, key points, and trends of global scientific output on acupuncture for chronic pain over the past decade. The investigators used a methodology called bibliometric analysis, which allows quantitative examination of large volumes of scientific literature. They searched for articles published between 2011 and 2022 in the Web of Science database, using terms related to acupuncture and various types of chronic pain. After a rigorous selection process, 1,616 articles were included for analysis.

The investigators used specialized software (VOSviewer and CiteSpace) to create visual maps of the relationships between countries, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords, allowing identification of collaboration patterns, main themes, and emerging trends in the field.

The results revealed consistent growth in the number of publications on acupuncture for chronic pain, rising from 70 articles in 2011 to 227 in 2021, with a peak of 246 publications in 2020. China leads scientific output by a wide margin with 598 articles (37% of the total), followed by the United States (173 articles), South Korea (100 articles), and other countries. Among institutions, Chinese universities of traditional medicine occupy the top positions, with the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine leading with 93 publications. The most productive researcher was Liang FR, with 43 published articles.

The journal 'Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine' published the most studies in the field. The most frequent themes included electroacupuncture, pain management, therapeutic efficacy, and systematic reviews. The analysis identified four major thematic clusters: experimental design, prevalent diseases (such as knee osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain, and neuropathic pain), therapeutic interventions, and mechanism studies.

The findings have important clinical implications for both patients and healthcare professionals. The research demonstrates that there is a growing and robust body of scientific evidence supporting the use of acupuncture for various chronic pain conditions. For patients, this means greater confidence in acupuncture as a legitimate therapeutic option, especially when conventional treatments have limitations or undesired side effects. The study identified that acupuncture has been shown to be effective for specific conditions such as migraine, knee osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain, and neuropathic pain.

The analysis also revealed important emerging trends, such as the growing use of neuroimaging to understand the brain mechanisms of acupuncture analgesia, and the growing attention to the relationship between chronic pain and depression. For health professionals, the results suggest the importance of considering acupuncture as part of integrated approaches to chronic pain treatment, especially given its potential to reduce dependence on opioid medications.

The study presents some important limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, the analysis was based exclusively on the Web of Science database, excluding publications in other databases and languages other than English, which may have resulted in the omission of relevant studies, especially from non-English-speaking countries. Second, although the analysis period was defined as 2011-2022, data collection was performed in June 2022, potentially missing publications from the second half of that year. Third, bibliometric analysis, by its quantitative nature, does not assess the individual methodological quality of included studies.

The study also revealed that, despite the growing volume of research, there is still a need to strengthen international collaboration and improve the methodological quality of studies, especially with regard to the design of randomized controlled trials. The trends identified — such as the growing focus on functional brain connectivity and the pain-depression relationship — point to promising directions for future research that may deepen our understanding of acupuncture's mechanisms and optimize its clinical application.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive analysis of 1,616 studies
  • 2Use of rigorous bibliometric methods
  • 3Clear identification of trends and research gaps
  • 4International collaboration identified
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Only Web of Science database used
  • 2Exclusion of non-English publications
  • 3Search conducted through June 2022
  • 4Possible selection bias by language
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Acupuncture for chronic pain has definitively moved out of the periphery of alternative medicine to occupy a recognized space in contemporary pain control. This bibliometric mapping of 1,616 articles published between 2011 and 2022 documents this shift precisely: publication volume more than tripled over the period, and the thematic clusters identified — knee osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain, neuropathic pain, and migraine — correspond exactly to the conditions that dominate outpatient demand in physiatry and pain services. For the clinician treating these conditions day to day, the most operationally relevant finding is the confirmation that there is a body of evidence robust enough to support acupuncture as a formal component of the therapeutic plan, and not as a last-resort option. This has direct implications for specific populations: patients with contraindications to or intolerance of opioids, older adults with osteoarthritis and comorbidities that limit NSAID use, and patients with chronic pain associated with depressive symptoms — all of whom benefit from the legitimization of this body of evidence.

Notable Findings

Two findings deserve special attention from those working at the clinical interface. The first is the substantial growth of research on neural mechanisms of acupuncture analgesia, with the use of functional neuroimaging to map brain connectivity — this shifts the conversation from 'does it work or not' to 'through which pathways does it work,' which is a relevant epistemological leap for the technique's credibility among skeptical peers. The second is the growing attention to the co-occurrence of chronic pain and depression as an integrated research object. The literature has already established that chronic pain and mood disorders share neurobiological substrates — descending serotonergic and noradrenergic axes, prefrontal cortex, amygdala — and the fact that this thematic cluster emerges spontaneously in the bibliometric analysis suggests that the field is converging toward approaches that treat pain and affect as a unified problem, which aligns acupuncture with the most current neuroscience of pain.

From My Experience

In my musculoskeletal pain clinic, I typically see the first signs of response between the third and fifth session, especially in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain and knee osteoarthritis — which are, not coincidentally, the same diagnoses that appear as central clusters in this work. For these profiles, I usually work with cycles of eight to twelve sessions as induction, followed by monthly maintenance sessions in those who respond well. The finding on the pain-depression relationship resonates directly with what I see: patients with elevated catastrophizing scores and associated depressive symptoms tend to respond more slowly and benefit from a combined approach with electroacupuncture and centrally acting pharmacological support. I do not prescribe acupuncture alone when there is a high-intensity neuropathic component without a defined etiological diagnosis — in these cases it enters as an adjunct, not as the primary axis. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with musculoskeletal pain of moderate intensity, without significant established central sensitization, who has already undergone physical therapy with a partial response.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Complementary Therapies in Medicine · 2023

DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102915

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.