Efficacy of acupuncture for chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: A randomized trial
Wang et al. · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · 2026
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether acupuncture reduces pain in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis resistant to treatment
WHO
120 patients with plantar fasciitis for at least 6 months who did not respond to conservative treatments
DURATION
4 weeks of treatment with 16 weeks of follow-up
POINTS
Local Ashi points, Chengshan (BL-57), Kunlun (BL-60) and Taixi (KI-3)
🔬 Study Design
High-intensity acupuncture
n=60
Needles with 15-20 mm penetration, manual manipulation every 10 minutes
Low-intensity acupuncture
n=30
Blunt needles at non-acupuncture points, without penetration
Waiting list
n=30
No treatment during the period
📊 Results in numbers
Response rate (≥50% pain reduction) at week 4 — combined groups vs control
Difference in response rate between groups
p-value for primary difference
Study completion rate
High-intensity acupuncture response rate at week 16
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Response rate (≥50% pain reduction) at week 4
Response rate at week 16
This study showed that acupuncture can be an effective option for people with persistent heel pain (plantar fasciitis) who did not improve with other treatments. More intensive acupuncture had better results, with more than half of patients showing significant pain reduction that was maintained for months after treatment.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Plantar fasciitis is one of the leading causes of heel pain, affecting millions of people annually. This condition is characterized by pain and tenderness in the plantar region of the foot, especially during weight-bearing activities. Although often considered a self-limiting condition, studies show that up to 80% of patients still feel pain after one year of treatment, and 44% report discomfort even after 15 years. When heel pain persists for more than six months despite conservative treatment, the condition is classified as chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis, which may require more invasive interventions.
This chronic form of the disease significantly limits patients' daily activities and is associated with falls, reduced quality of life, and functional disability.
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether acupuncture would be effective in reducing pain in patients with chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. The researchers conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial at two Chinese hospitals, comparing different intensities of acupuncture with a waiting-list control group. A total of 120 participants were randomized into three groups: high-intensity acupuncture (60 patients), low-intensity acupuncture (30 patients), and waiting-list control (30 patients). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved at least 50% reduction in morning pain intensity after four weeks of treatment.
Participants were 18 to 75 years of age, with plantar fasciitis for at least six months, and had already tried conservative treatments such as anti-inflammatory drugs, stretching exercises, or shock-wave therapy without success. Treatment consisted of three weekly sessions for four weeks, with follow-up to 16 weeks.
The results demonstrated that acupuncture was significantly more effective than waiting-list control. After four weeks, 56.7% of patients who received acupuncture (combined groups) showed clinically significant pain improvement, compared with only 33.3% in the control group, a difference of 23.3%. Even more impressive was the dose-response gradient related to treatment intensity: high-intensity acupuncture showed superior results at all assessments. At week 16, 76.7% of patients in the high-intensity group were considered treatment responders, compared with 56.7% in the low-intensity group and 36.7% in the control group.
The difference between high intensity and control was 40% at week 16, while the difference between low intensity and control was only 20% and did not reach statistical significance. The benefits remained stable throughout the 16-week follow-up period, suggesting durable treatment effects.
For patients suffering from chronic plantar fasciitis, these findings offer a promising therapeutic alternative, especially when conventional treatments have failed. High-intensity acupuncture proved particularly effective, providing significant and lasting pain relief. For healthcare professionals, the study provides robust evidence that acupuncture treatment intensity is a crucial factor for therapeutic success. Acupuncture proved safe, with only mild adverse events such as small subcutaneous hematomas or transient acute pain.
In addition to pain reduction, patients also showed improvement in activities of daily living and reduced need for rescue analgesic medication. These results suggest that acupuncture, especially at high intensity, should be considered a valid treatment option for patients with chronic plantar fasciitis who do not respond to conventional care.
The study has some important limitations that should be considered. First, the 12-week follow-up period may be insufficient to assess the long-term sustainability of acupuncture effects in a chronic and potentially recurrent condition. Second, a fixed acupuncture protocol was used, which differs from usual clinical practice where treatment is often individualized. Third, the inclusion of participants from only two Chinese hospitals may limit the generalizability of the results to other populations.
In addition, the study was powered to compare combined acupuncture groups versus control, not direct comparisons between high and low intensity, limiting definitive conclusions about the relative superiority of the two approaches. Despite these limitations, the results provide compelling evidence that acupuncture, particularly at high intensity, represents a valuable therapeutic option for patients with chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis, offering significant pain relief with effects maintained for at least four months after treatment initiation.
Strengths
- 1Robust design with adequate control group
- 2Extended 16-week follow-up
- 3Analysis of treatment intensity
- 4High adherence rate (90.8%)
- 5Clear criteria for resistant plantar fasciitis
Limitations
- 1Acupuncturists could not be blinded
- 2Study limited to two Chinese hospitals
- 3Fixed protocol vs individualized treatment in practice
- 4Sample not powered for comparison between intensities
- 5Follow-up limited to 16 weeks
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Chronic refractory plantar fasciitis represents a real challenge in the physiatry clinic — the patient who arrives with six months or more of symptoms, has already used anti-inflammatory drugs, performed stretching, sometimes already underwent shock-wave therapy, and continues limping when getting out of bed. For this specific profile, high-intensity acupuncture delivered a 76.7% response rate at week 16, against 36.7% in the untreated control group — a difference of undeniable clinical weight. In rehabilitation practice, this positions acupuncture as a structured option before escalating to more invasive procedures, such as corticosteroid injection or fascial release surgery. The protocol of three weekly sessions over four weeks is feasible in outpatient rehabilitation services and offers a clear decision point: assess response at the end of the month and plan continuation. The durability of effects through week 16 reinforces the cost-effectiveness argument with administrators and health insurers.
▸ Notable Findings
The dose-response gradient is the most relevant finding of the study and deserves attention: low-intensity acupuncture — blunt needles at points off the meridians, without real penetration — produced a 56.7% response at week 16, whereas high intensity reached 76.7%. This 20-percentage-point difference suggests that the response is not entirely attributable to a contextual placebo effect, but also to technique variables — insertion depth of 15 to 20 mm and manual manipulation every ten minutes, generating mechanical stimulation to the fascia and periarticular structures. The fact that benefits remained stable from weeks 4 to 16, without efficacy decline, indicates that the neurophysiologic effect generated — likely via modulation of peripheral nociceptors and descending inhibitory pathways — has sustainability beyond the active treatment period. The high completion rate of 90.8% in a refractory population also signals relevant clinical tolerability.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, chronic refractory plantar fasciitis usually arrives with a history of one or two prior injections and previous physical therapy. I have observed that these patients respond well to dry needling of trigger points in the flexor digitorum brevis and intrinsic plantar musculature, combined with distal points such as Zusanli and Kunlun — a protocol that converges quite well with the high-intensity approach described in this trial. I usually see perceptible reduction in morning pain between the third and fifth sessions, and my usual standard is eight to ten sessions in total, with functional reassessment at the end. Combination with a home program of eccentric stretching of the posterior chain and prescription of viscoelastic insoles enhances and sustains the result. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with a predominantly local sensitization phenotype — pain well circumscribed to the calcaneal tubercle — without exacerbated central component.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Complementary Therapies in Medicine · 2026
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2026.103329
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories