Skip to content

Effects of Traditional Cupping Therapy in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Michalsen et al. · The Journal of Pain · 2009

🧪Randomized Clinical Trial👥n=52 participants🎯High impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
3/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of traditional wet cupping therapy in patients with neurologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome

👥

WHO

52 outpatients (58.5 ± 8.0 years) with carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by neurological examination

⏱️

DURATION

7-day follow-up after a single treatment

📍

POINTS

Trapezius muscle region with connective tissue alterations segmentally related to the median nerve

🔬 Study Design

52participants
randomization

Cupping Therapy

n=26

Single application of wet cupping therapy on the trapezius

Control

n=26

Single application of local heat to the trapezius region

⏱️ Duration: 7 days

📊 Results in numbers

0%

Reduction in total symptom score (cupping)

0%

Reduction in total symptom score (control)

p < 0.001

Difference between groups

11.1 points

Improvement on the DASH scale (disability)

Percentage highlights

59%
Reduction in total symptom score (cupping)
23%
Reduction in total symptom score (control)

📊 Outcome Comparison

VAS symptom score (mm)

Cupping Therapy
24.6
Control
51.7
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that a single session of wet cupping therapy applied to the shoulder region can significantly reduce pain, tingling, and numbness in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Effects lasted at least one week and also improved functional capacity and neck pain.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a fairly common condition that affects approximately 3% of the general population, causing numbness, tingling, burning, and pain especially in the thumb, index, and middle fingers. In addition to considerable physical discomfort, this syndrome can lead to work absenteeism and generate significant medical costs. Women are more frequently affected than men, and symptoms tend to be disabling for daily activities. The condition results from compression of the median nerve at the wrist, generally caused by fibrosis of connective tissue surrounding the flexor tendons.

Although there are conventional treatments such as splints, anti-inflammatory medications, and surgery, results are not always entirely satisfactory, with surgery yielding good results in only 75% of cases.

This study investigated the efficacy of a traditional therapy called wet cupping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The research was conducted as a randomized controlled clinical trial with 52 outpatients who had a confirmed neurological diagnosis of the syndrome. Participants, with a mean age of approximately 58 years, were randomly divided into two groups: one received wet cupping therapy and the other received local heat application as a control. Cupping therapy consisted of superficially perforating the skin over the trapezius muscle in the shoulder region, applying suction cups for 5 to 10 minutes until they partially filled with capillary blood, performed in only one session.

The control group received heat application for 15 minutes at the same region. All patients were assessed at baseline and one week after treatment.

Results demonstrated significant benefits of cupping therapy compared with heat application. The total symptom score, which included pain, tingling, and numbness measured on visual analog scales, reduced dramatically in the cupping group: from 61.5 points to 24.6 points after seven days, while in the control group the reduction was smaller, from 67.1 to 51.7 points. This difference represents an improvement of approximately 60% in symptoms in the cupping-treated group. In addition, researchers observed significant improvements in functional disability, physical quality of life, and reduction of neck pain, which was present in most patients.

All participants completed the study without dropouts, and the treatment was considered safe and well tolerated, with only mild local hematomas as minor adverse effects.

For patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, these results suggest that cupping therapy may be a promising therapeutic option, especially considering that it is a simple treatment, performed in a single session, and provided substantial symptom relief. For healthcare professionals, the study indicates that complementary therapies based on traditional medicine may have a place in the therapeutic arsenal for this common condition. The theory behind the treatment is based on the "double crush" hypothesis, which suggests that problems in the cervical region and shoulder may contribute to wrist symptoms, and that treating these related areas may benefit the primary condition. Cupping therapy may work by improving local circulation, modulating lymphatic flow, and exerting antinociceptive effects.

The study has some important limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. As an open-label study, where neither patients nor researchers were blinded to the treatment received, there is the possibility that placebo effects influenced the results. Although researchers assessed patient expectations and found no significant differences between groups, developing a convincing placebo procedure for cupping therapy remains challenging. In addition, follow-up was limited to only one week, not allowing assessment of long-term effects.

The sample size, although adequate to detect significant differences, was relatively small. Future studies with longer follow-up periods, control groups with established treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome, and if possible with masking procedures, will be necessary to confirm these promising results and establish the role of cupping therapy in the treatment of this prevalent condition.

Strengths

  • 1Clinically significant improvement in symptoms (60% reduction)
  • 2Safe and well-tolerated treatment without serious adverse events
  • 3Consistent effects across multiple outcome measures
  • 4Accessible and low-cost traditional method
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Open-label study without possibility of adequate blinding
  • 2Very short follow-up (only 7 days)
  • 3Small sample may overestimate effects
  • 4Control group with treatment not standardized for CTS

📅 Historical Context

1973Proposição da hipótese do duplo esmagamento por Upton e McComas
2005Recrutamento e randomização dos pacientes (julho-novembro)
2006Conclusão dos tratamentos e seguimento (janeiro)
2009Publicação demonstrando efetividade da ventosaterapia na STC
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Carpal tunnel syndrome represents one of the most prevalent diagnoses in the physiatry and pain outpatient clinic, and a large proportion of patients present to the office refractory to or unsatisfied with conventional management — splint, anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid injection, or even postoperative incomplete relief. This trial by Michalsen and colleagues introduces a simple, low-cost intervention applied remotely from the symptomatic site: wet cupping therapy on the trapezius, grounded in the double crush hypothesis, which posits a cervical and shoulder contribution to median nerve neuropathy. The 59% reduction in total symptom score within seven days, against 23% in the control, has clinically expressive magnitude and opens space for incorporating this technique into the multidisciplinary CTS treatment flow, especially in patients with associated neck pain — a very frequent subgroup in the rehabilitation service.

Notable Findings

The most intriguing finding is not the reduction of wrist pain itself, but the fact that the intervention was performed remotely from the compressive site — over the trapezius — and still generated an expressive response in the hands and fingers. This provides empirical support for the double crush hypothesis and suggests that components of central sensitization and proximal neural involvement have real weight in the phenomenology of CTS. The 11.1-point improvement on the DASH scale reinforces that the effect was not just point analgesia, but functionally relevant. Equally noteworthy is the concomitant improvement in neck pain, present in most participants, which indicates that cupping therapy may act through broader segmental antinociceptive mechanisms than simple local circulation — possibly via sympathetic nervous system modulation and release of cutaneous vasoactive mediators.

From My Experience

In my CTS practice, I have long adopted a regional view of the syndrome: I rarely treat the wrist in isolation when there is associated cervical or brachial plexus tension. I have observed that patients with a clear cervical component — mild positive Spurling, C5-C6 rotational restriction, hypertonic trapezius — respond consistently better to approaches that include the proximal chain. I usually combine dry needling at trigger points of the trapezius and scalenes with a night splint and a cervical stretching program; wet cupping therapy enters as an alternative or complement within this same rationale. In these cases, I see noticeable response in three to four sessions, and maintenance is usually performed with monthly visits for two to three months. The patient profile that benefits most, in my experience, is the woman over fifty, with repetitive work, chronic neck pain, and bilateral CTS — exactly the profile described in this trial. When the clinical picture is purely compressive, without a proximal component, surgical indication prevails and I do not delay this referral.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

The Journal of Pain · 2009

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.013

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.