Skip to content

Acupuncture in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Efficacy of Two Acupuncture Points Versus a Single One

Alizadeh et al. · Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies · 2014

🔬Double-Blind RCT👥n=227 participantsModerate Evidence

Evidence Level

MODERATE
72/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
3/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Compare the efficacy of two simultaneous acupuncture points (PC-6 + LI-4) versus a single point (PC-6) in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting

👥

WHO

227 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, ASA I or II classification

⏱️

DURATION

1-2 hour surgeries with assessment in the first 24 postoperative hours

📍

POINTS

PC-6 (Neiguan) alone vs. PC-6 + LI-4 (Hegu) combined, inserted bilaterally

🔬 Study Design

227participants
randomization

Single Group

n=112

Acupuncture only at PC-6 bilateral

Combined Group

n=115

Acupuncture at PC-6 + LI-4 bilateral

⏱️ Duration: 1 year of recruitment with 24-hour follow-up

📊 Results in numbers

0%

Nausea in combined group

0%

Nausea in single group

0%

Vomiting in combined group

0%

Vomiting in single group

p<0.05

Statistical significance

Percentage highlights

51.3%
Nausea in combined group
75%
Nausea in single group
18.3%
Vomiting in combined group
34.8%
Vomiting in single group

📊 Outcome Comparison

Nausea Incidence (%)

PC-6 + LI-4
51.3
PC-6 only
75

Vomiting Incidence (%)

PC-6 + LI-4
18.3
PC-6 only
34.8
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that using two acupuncture points together (PC-6 on the wrist and LI-4 on the hand) works better than using a single point to prevent nausea and vomiting after surgery. Patients who received acupuncture at both points had less nausea and vomiting in the 24 hours following the operation.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This double-blind randomized controlled trial investigated whether the combination of two acupuncture points would be more effective than a single point in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conducted at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran, Iran, between June 2011 and June 2012, the study enrolled 227 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Inclusion criteria covered patients with ASA I or II classification, surgeries lasting 1-2 hours, excluding eye or ear operations. Patients who had used steroids in the previous month, with surgeries longer than 2 hours or a history of motion sickness, were excluded.

Participants were randomized into two groups: 112 patients received acupuncture only at the PC-6 (Neiguan) bilateral point, while 115 patients received combined acupuncture at the PC-6 and LI-4 (Hegu) bilateral points. All acupuncture procedures were performed by an experienced acupuncturist immediately after anesthetic induction, with sterile needles kept in place throughout the surgery. The anesthetic protocol was standardized for all patients, including induction with sodium thiopental, atracurium, and lidocaine, followed by maintenance with propofol, fentanyl, and ventilation with oxygen and nitrous oxide. Randomization was performed by a computerized program, ensuring that surgeon, patients, and investigator remained blinded to the study groups.

Assessment of nausea and vomiting was performed subjectively by a trained nurse blinded to the study during the first 24 postoperative hours. The results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the groups. In the combined group (PC-6 + LI-4), 51.3% of patients had nausea compared with 75% in the single group (PC-6 only), representing a significant reduction (p<0.05). Regarding vomiting, only 18.3% of patients in the combined group had this symptom versus 34.8% in the single group, also statistically significant (p<0.05).

There were no significant demographic differences between the groups, including age, sex, type of surgery, and early postoperative complications. The clinical implications suggest that adding the LI-4 point to the traditionally used PC-6 may offer additional benefit in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. The PC-6 point, located 5 cm proximal to the distal wrist crease, has a recognized antiemetic effect, while LI-4, traditionally used for pain management, demonstrated in this study a complementary effect. The authors propose that this combination represents an advance in perioperative integrative medicine, offering an alternative with fewer adverse effects than conventional antiemetic medications.

The proposed mechanism of action includes possible gastric stimulation promoting emptying and increasing intestinal motility, although the exact mechanism remains incompletely understood.

Strengths

  • 1Rigorous double-blind design
  • 2Adequate sample of 227 patients
  • 3Standardized anesthetic protocol
  • 4Assessment by personnel blinded to the study
  • 5First investigation of the PC-6+LI-4 combination
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Subjective outcome assessment
  • 2Variation in the precise anatomic definition of LI-4
  • 3Follow-up limited to 24 hours
  • 4Single-center study
  • 5Lack of a control group without acupuncture
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) affect 20% to 30% of surgical patients overall, reaching 70%-80% in high-risk populations, and remain one of the leading causes of dissatisfaction with perioperative care and of delayed hospital discharge. This work, conducted in an elective ASA I-II surgical population with a standardized anesthetic protocol, offers direct evidence for incorporating the PC-6 + LI-4 combination into non-pharmacologic prophylaxis routines. The intervention window — needling immediately after anesthetic induction — is operationally simple and fits seamlessly into the operating room workflow. Patients with a history of PONV, motion sickness predisposition (excluded in this study), or contraindication to conventional antiemetics such as ondansetron or dexamethasone constitute the most immediate target. The combination can also serve as an adjuvant strategy within multimodal ERAS protocols, reducing pharmacologic burden without sacrificing efficacy.

Notable Findings

The absolute reduction in nausea from 75% to 51.3% with the addition of LI-4 to the PC-6 protocol represents a clinically relevant number needed to treat, and the effect on vomiting — from 34.8% to 18.3% — is even more expressive in proportional terms. The most noteworthy finding is not the isolated effect of PC-6, widely documented in the literature, but the incremental gain conferred by LI-4, a point whose primary indication lies in pain management rather than nausea control. This raises a concrete mechanistic question: does LI-4 act via modulation of gastric motility, as the authors suggest, or via descending pain control pathways that converge onto autonomic circuits involved in the emetic reflex? The dissociation between the analgesic and antiemetic effects of this point deserves specific investigation, as it would open space for its use in contexts beyond the perioperative setting.

From My Experience

In my practice, PC-6 needling was already part of the perioperative arsenal before evidence of the caliber of this trial — the clinical response observed was consistent but incomplete in patients with high PONV risk scores. Routine incorporation of LI-4 as a second point started to make practical sense as I observed a more sustained response in the early hours of post-anesthesia recovery. I usually see perceptible benefit in the recovery room, without the need for repeated sessions — a single intraoperative needling, maintained throughout the procedure, seems sufficient for the critical 24-hour period. I prefer this combination especially in women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic procedures, classically a high-risk profile. I do not indicate the technique when there is restricted access to the wrist and hand because of the surgical field or monitoring, nor in patients with relevant coagulopathy. Combining it with ondansetron remains the standard in cases of very high risk, using acupuncture as an adjuvant rather than a substitute.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies · 2014

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jams.2013.04.005

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.