Cupping Therapy: An Overview from a Modern Medicine Perspective
Aboushanab et al. · Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies · 2018
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Review cupping therapy practice and propose updated classifications for types, equipment, and adverse events
WHO
Literature review on ancient practices and modern studies
DURATION
Historical analysis from 1550 B.C. to current studies
POINTS
Application mainly on the back, chest, abdomen, buttocks, and legs
🔬 Study Design
📊 Results in numbers
Main types of cupping therapy
Proposed classification categories
Main indications
Adverse events
📊 Outcome Comparison
Efficacy by Condition
Cupping therapy is an ancient technique that uses cups applied to the skin to create suction, promoting blood circulation and pain relief. Studies show growing evidence of its benefits for back pain, neck pain, and other conditions, and it is considered relatively safe when practiced properly.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Cupping therapy, popularly known in Brazil as "ventosas" and in other countries as "cupping," is a millennia-old practice of traditional medicine that has been gaining prominence in the modern medical world. This ancient technique involves the application of special cups over specific points on the skin, creating a suction pressure that can be produced by heat or by vacuum equipment. Historical documents, including the Ebers papyrus from Ancient Egypt dating to 1550 B.C., already mentioned this practice, which later spread across various cultures, including Chinese, Greek, Arab, and Islamic medicine. The Greek physician Hippocrates, considered the father of medicine, described in detail different types of cupping and their specific applications, demonstrating the historical importance of this therapeutic technique.
This review study, conducted by researchers from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine of Saudi Arabia, had as its main objective to provide a comprehensive view of cupping therapy from a modern medicine perspective. The authors conducted a detailed analysis of the available scientific literature, examining different aspects of the practice, from its mechanisms of action to its current clinical applications. The methodology involved systematic review of scientific studies, historical documents, and clinical evidence, with the purpose of creating updated and standardized classifications for different aspects of cupping therapy. The study also proposed to establish clear guidelines on indications, contraindications, and safety measures necessary for the safe practice of this therapy.
Although the exact mechanism of action of cupping therapy is not yet fully elucidated, the researchers identified several promising theories. The main hypothesis involves the effects of the subatmospheric pressure created by the cups, which promotes peripheral blood circulation and improves the local immune response. Studies have demonstrated that the therapy can increase blood flow in the skin, modify the biomechanical properties of tissues, raise the pain threshold, improve local anaerobic metabolism, reduce inflammation, and modulate the cellular immune system. The study also presented a new updated classification of cupping therapy types, organizing them into six main categories: technical types, suction intensity, suction method, additional therapies, conditions, and treated areas.
This more detailed classification allows better understanding and standardization of clinical practice.
For patients, the results show that cupping therapy presents promising evidence in the treatment of various conditions, especially those related to pain. Research has demonstrated significant benefits for low back pain, neck and shoulder pain, headaches and migraines, knee pain, facial paralysis, carpal tunnel syndrome, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, and asthma. It is important to highlight that the therapy proved to be relatively safe when performed by qualified professionals, with adverse effects generally mild to moderate. For healthcare professionals, the study offers important guidelines on contraindications, including situations where therapy should be absolutely avoided, such as in patients with cancer, organ failure, pacemaker use, or coagulation disorders.
The work also establishes relative contraindications, such as acute infections, anticoagulant use, pregnancy, and anemia.
The study acknowledges some important limitations that should be considered. The main one is the lack of complete understanding of the mechanisms of action of cupping therapy, which indicates the need for more basic and clinical research to clarify exactly how the therapy produces its beneficial effects. In addition, although there is promising evidence for various conditions, the authors emphasize that more controlled and randomized clinical studies are needed to definitively establish the efficacy of cupping therapy in different medical situations. The work also highlights the crucial importance of following rigorous infection control measures, including the use of disposable equipment, adequate disinfection, and personal protective equipment.
For patients interested in this therapy, it is essential to seek properly trained and certified professionals, who can adequately assess individual indications and contraindications. Cupping therapy should not be viewed as a substitute for conventional medical treatments, but rather as a complementary therapy that can offer additional benefits when integrated into a comprehensive treatment plan.
Strengths
- 1Technique with millennia-old history of safe use
- 2Growing evidence of efficacy for chronic pain
- 3Proposes useful classifications for standardization
- 4Comprehensive approach to safety and contraindications
Limitations
- 1Mechanism of action not yet fully elucidated
- 2Narrative review without systematic analysis
- 3Requires more high-quality controlled studies
- 4Standardization of techniques still under development
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Cupping therapy occupies an increasingly defined space within the integrative therapeutic arsenal for chronic pain conditions, and this review fulfills the function of organizing the field in a way that is useful in daily clinical practice. The proposed classification into six categories — technical types, suction intensity, suction method, additional therapies, conditions, and treated areas — offers the clinician a standardized vocabulary that facilitates both communication between teams and reasoning about which modality to employ in each scenario. In practice, this translates directly: the patient with chronic low back pain unresponsive to conventional physical therapy, or the one with neck pain associated with prolonged postural work, now has in cupping therapy an option with more structured clinical grounding. The absolute contraindications listed — coagulopathies, active malignancies, pacemaker, organ failure — are precisely the cases that arrive at the office without adequate screening, making this document a practical safety reference.
▸ Notable Findings
What most stands out in this review is the effort to connect modern physiological mechanisms to a millennia-old practice documented since the Ebers papyrus of 1550 B.C. The central hypothesis of subatmospheric pressure as a modulator of peripheral blood flow, biomechanical tissue properties, and pain threshold provides the technique with a pathophysiological substrate that goes beyond empirical tradition. Particularly relevant is the modulation of the cellular immune response and the reduction of local inflammation, findings that expand the indications beyond musculoskeletal pain to encompass conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, and hypertension. The breadth of the indication spectrum with an adverse event profile classified as mild to moderate positions cupping therapy as a relatively low-risk intervention, especially when compared to long-term pharmacotherapies in populations with comorbidities.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, I have incorporated dry cupping as an adjunctive resource in cases of myofascial pain and chronic low back pain for many years, and what I observe consistently is that the response begins to take shape after the second or third session, particularly in cases with a regional muscle hypertonia component. I typically combine the technique with systemic acupuncture and trigger point work, which seems to enhance the analgesic effect in a clinically perceptible way. For maintenance, the pattern I observe is 8 to 12 initial sessions, followed by monthly visits in patients who respond well. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the middle-aged adult with chronic musculoskeletal pain, without coagulopathy and not on anticoagulants — exactly the group that this review delimits most clearly. I avoid the wet technique outside of very specific contexts, due to the need for rigorous infection control that is not always feasible in all services.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies · 2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jams.2018.02.001
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories