Efficacy of Acupuncture in the Management of Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Shetty et al. · Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies · 2018
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea
WHO
60 young women (17-23 years) with primary dysmenorrhea
DURATION
90 days of treatment with assessments at 30, 60, and 90 days
POINTS
12 points: KI-3, SP-8, ST-25, ST-29, ST-30, ST-36, CV-4, CV-6, BL-62, HT-7, LI-4, PC-6
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture
n=30
45 acupuncture sessions (20 min/day, 15 days/month)
Control
n=30
Normal routine without treatment
📊 Results in numbers
Pain reduction (VAS) in the acupuncture group
Reduced menstrual cramps
Improvement in systemic symptoms
No adverse effects reported
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Pain Intensity (VAS 0-10)
Menstrual Cramps (0-3)
This study showed that acupuncture can be an effective alternative for reducing severe menstrual pain. Women who received acupuncture had significant reductions in pain, cramping, and symptoms such as nausea and headaches, with no side effects.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Primary dysmenorrhea is one of the most common gynecologic conditions, affecting 25-50% of women of reproductive age and characterized by severe uterine pain during menstruation, often accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and fatigue. This randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in the management of primary dysmenorrhea, a promising therapeutic approach from Traditional Chinese Medicine.
The methodology involved 60 young women (17-23 years) recruited from a residential college in India, all with a history of primary dysmenorrhea for at least one year and regular menstrual cycles. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the study group received traditional Chinese acupuncture, while the control group maintained their normal routine without intervention. The acupuncture protocol consisted of 45 sessions distributed over 90 days, with 20 minutes per session, 15 sessions per month, applied at 12 specific points including KI-3, SP-8, ST-25, ST-29, ST-30, ST-36, CV-4, CV-6, BL-62, HT-7, LI-4, and PC-6.
The results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the acupuncture group compared with the control. Pain intensity, measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), decreased dramatically from 7.29 to 4.43 points in the acupuncture group, while the control group maintained elevated levels (7.17 points). Menstrual cramps also decreased substantially, from 1.90 to 0.70 on a 0-3 scale. In addition, systemic symptoms such as headache, dizziness, diarrhea, mood changes, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting showed significant reductions in the treated group.
The mechanism of action proposed by the researchers is based on the central analgesic effects of acupuncture and its reflex effects on tissues, including changes in blood flow. Previous studies have identified that acupuncture can alter the metabolism of substrates involved in the ascending facilitatory and descending inhibitory pain pathways, stimulating the release of enkephalins and endorphins in specific brain structures. The technique can also regulate neuroendocrine activities of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and promote vasodilation, increasing blood circulation in the target area.
The clinical implications are significant, suggesting that acupuncture can be an effective therapeutic modality for the management of primary dysmenorrhea, offering an alternative free of relevant side effects compared with conventional pharmacologic treatments. The fact that no participant reported adverse effects during the study period reinforces the safety profile of the intervention.
However, the study has important limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. The sample size calculation was not based on prior or pilot studies, representing a methodologic limitation acknowledged by the authors themselves. In addition, objective measures such as changes in uterine blood flow, biochemical markers, and neurotransmitters were not assessed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed effects. Follow-up of the participants was also limited, not allowing assessment of the persistence of benefits after the end of treatment.
In conclusion, this study provides promising preliminary evidence on the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea, demonstrating clinically significant reductions in pain and associated symptoms. However, future studies with larger samples, longer follow-up, and more objective measures are needed to confirm these findings and better understand the mechanisms of action involved.
Strengths
- 1Randomized controlled clinical trial
- 2Controlled environment with all participants under supervision
- 3Absence of reported adverse effects
- 4Standardized acupuncture protocol
- 5Multiple outcomes assessed
Limitations
- 1Small sample without statistical power calculation
- 2Absence of objective measures (biomarkers, blood flow)
- 3Lack of post-intervention follow-up
- 4Control group without placebo
- 5Population limited to young university women
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Primary dysmenorrhea substantially compromises the quality of life of women of reproductive age, and a considerable proportion of them either do not tolerate conventional anti-inflammatory drugs and oral contraceptives or prefer to avoid them for various reasons. This randomized controlled trial, by documenting a clinically meaningful reduction on the VAS scale — from 7.29 to 4.43 — and a marked drop in cramping frequency over 90 days, reinforces acupuncture as a concrete therapeutic option in this scenario. The protocol with 12 selected points, including SP-8, CV-4, ST-36, and LI-4, covers both the regulation of uterine Qi and systemic pain modulation, which translates into the simultaneous reduction of accompanying symptoms — nausea, dizziness, mood changes, and fatigue. Clinically, this means that the physician has a safe tool to integrate into the multimodal management of dysmenorrhea, especially in young patients seeking alternatives without pharmacologic adverse effects.
▸ Notable Findings
The reduction of menstrual cramps from 1.90 to 0.70 on the three-point scale deserves special attention, as it reflects not only subjective pain relief but also a decrease in the perceived intensity of contractility — a functionally relevant outcome. Equally noteworthy is the statistically significant improvement in the set of systemic symptoms, suggesting that the action of acupuncture extends beyond local analgesic control and acts on neuroendocrine and autonomic components of the menstrual cycle. The mechanism proposed by the authors — modulation of the ascending and descending pain pathways with release of enkephalins and endorphins, combined with regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and uterine vasodilation — is consistent with the accumulating neurophysiologic literature on acupuncture. The absolute safety profile, with zero adverse events across 45 sessions per participant, consolidates the feasibility of the intervention in young, healthy populations.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice with primary dysmenorrhea, I usually observe the first responses by the second treated cycle, which corresponds approximately to sessions 15 to 20 within a structured protocol like the one in this study. The patient profile that responds best, in my experience, is exactly the one described here: young women without underlying gynecologic comorbidities, with well-characterized cyclic pain and an evident component of central hyperalgesia in the accompanying systemic symptoms. At the Pain Center, we routinely combine acupuncture with regular aerobic exercise and, when needed, short-course NSAIDs in the first cycles, gradually tapering medication as the response consolidates. For maintenance, I have been working with monthly perimenstrual sessions after the intensive phase, which sustains the gains without burdening the patient. Points such as SP-8 and CV-4 have been anchors of my protocol for decades, and seeing this set validated in an RCT — even with a modest sample — confirms choices that clinical practice had already established.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies · 2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jams.2018.04.001
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories