Comparison of treatment effects on lateral epicondylitis between acupuncture and extracorporeal shockwave therapy
Wong et al. · Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology · 2017
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Compare the effects of acupuncture and extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow)
WHO
34 patients with lateral epicondylitis, no prior surgical treatment
DURATION
3 weeks of treatment with 2 weeks of follow-up
POINTS
Ah-shi, LI-10 (Shousanli), LI-11 (Quchi), LU-5 (Chize), LI-4 (Hegu), TE-5 (Waiguan)
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture
n=17
6 sessions over 3 weeks, 2x per week, 20 min per session
Shockwave
n=17
3 sessions over 3 weeks, 1x per week, 2000 Hz
📊 Results in numbers
Pain reduction (acupuncture)
Pain reduction (shockwave)
Difference between groups
Persistence of relief
Adverse effects (acupuncture)
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Visual Analog Scale of Pain (baseline)
Visual Analog Scale of Pain (post-treatment)
This study shows that both acupuncture and extracorporeal shockwave therapy are equally effective in reducing tennis elbow pain. Both treatments provided significant pain relief that persisted for at least two weeks after the end of treatment, offering patients validated therapeutic options.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Lateral epicondylitis, popularly known as tennis elbow, is a repetitive strain injury that affects between 1-3% of the general population and up to 23% of workers with specific occupational activities. This condition is characterized by pain and tenderness at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, significantly affecting function and activities of daily living. Despite its high prevalence, there is still no established standard treatment for this condition. In Hong Kong, both acupuncture and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) have gained popularity in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis, but few studies have directly compared the efficacy of these methods.
This pioneering study was developed to compare the therapeutic effects of acupuncture and ESWT in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Using a parallel-group study design, 34 patients with confirmed diagnoses were randomized into two groups of 17 participants each. The acupuncture group received treatment twice a week for three weeks, totaling six 20-minute sessions. The protocol included six specific points: Ah-shi (local pain point), LI-10 (Shousanli), LI-11 (Quchi), LU-5 (Chize), LI-4 (Hegu), and TE-5 (Waiguan), with insertion depth of 1.25-2.5 cm and induction of De Qi sensation every five minutes.
The ESWT group received three weekly sessions for three weeks, using a focused shockwave generator at a frequency of 2000 Hz and energy flux density ranging between 0.032-0.822 mJ/mm², applied at the origin of the common extensor tendon.
Assessments were performed at three time points: before treatment (baseline), immediately after the end of treatment, and two weeks after the end of the intervention. Primary outcomes included pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), maximum grip strength assessed with the Jamar dynamometer, and level of functional impairment measured by the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) questionnaire.
The results demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the two treatments at any time point. Both groups showed significant improvement in pain scores in longitudinal comparisons. In the acupuncture group, pain decreased from 6.12 to 3.88 points on the VAS after treatment, representing a reduction of approximately 37%. In the ESWT group, the reduction was from 5.47 to 3.65 points, corresponding to a decrease of about 33%.
Importantly, this improvement remained significant at the two-week follow-up in both groups, with effect sizes considered large (>0.8) for both interventions.
Regarding grip strength and function as measured by the DASH questionnaire, although a trend toward improvement was observed in both groups, no statistically significant differences were found. This finding suggests that, although both treatments are effective for pain relief, longer periods or modified protocols may be needed to observe substantial functional improvements.
An interesting aspect observed was that the improvement in pain ceased when treatment ended in both groups, suggesting that the analgesic effect is directly related to the period of active intervention. However, pain relief persisted for at least two weeks after the end of treatment, indicating a beneficial residual effect.
In terms of safety, 17.6% of patients in the acupuncture group reported local pain after treatment, while 29.4% of patients in the ESWT group complained of pain during or after sessions. These findings suggest a slightly better tolerability profile for acupuncture.
This study represents the first direct comparison between acupuncture and ESWT for lateral epicondylitis with adequate sample size, providing important evidence to guide clinical practice. The results suggest that both modalities are viable therapeutic options, with similar short-term efficacy in pain relief, allowing professionals and patients to make informed choices based on personal preferences, availability, and cost-effectiveness considerations.
Strengths
- 1First study to directly compare acupuncture and ESWT for lateral epicondylitis
- 2Adequately calculated sample size (n=34)
- 3Well-defined standardized acupuncture protocol
- 4Assessment at multiple time points
- 5Use of validated outcome measures (VAS, DASH, dynamometry)
Limitations
- 1Absence of a placebo control group
- 2Follow-up limited to only 2 weeks
- 3No record of analgesic use by patients
- 4Possible bias due to uncontrolled self-massage
- 5Small sample size to detect subtle differences
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Lateral epicondylitis is one of the most frequent musculoskeletal conditions in the pain and rehabilitation clinic, affecting 1 to 3% of the general population and reaching up to 23% in workers performing repetitive gripping activities. The absence of a consolidated therapeutic standard makes any direct comparative evidence extremely useful for decision-making. This work offers the physician a concrete basis for positioning acupuncture as an alternative equivalent to ESWT, especially in scenarios where access to shockwave equipment is limited, the patient has contraindications to shockwave therapy, or when the tolerability profile is decisive. A pain reduction of around 37% with six acupuncture sessions, maintained two weeks after the end of the protocol, qualifies the technique as a first-line option in populations of manual workers, racquet sport practitioners, and musicians.
▸ Notable Findings
The statistical equivalence between acupuncture and ESWT — with large effect sizes for both interventions on VAS pain — is the central finding that warrants attention. The acupuncture protocol combined a local Ah-shi point with classic distal points along the large intestine and triple energizer meridians, inducing De Qi every five minutes, which represents a high and reproducible stimulation density. The adverse-event profile is revealing: 17.6% local post-session pain in the acupuncture group versus 29.4% in the ESWT group, a clinically relevant difference in the context of treatment adherence. The absence of statistically significant improvement in grip strength and DASH score in both groups at three weeks indicates that the early benefit is predominantly analgesic and that functional outcomes require longer therapeutic horizons.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in the musculoskeletal pain clinic, lateral epicondylitis is one of the indications in which acupuncture has the most predictable return. I usually observe perceptible pain reduction as early as between the second and third session, which considerably improves the patient's adherence to the rehabilitation program as a whole. I usually work with eight to twelve sessions as a complete cycle, followed by functional reassessment before deciding on maintenance or discharge. The combination with an eccentric strengthening program for the wrist extensors and ergonomic guidance is essential — isolated acupuncture, as the data of this study suggest, produces analgesic relief without necessarily resolving the tendinopathic substrate. The patient profile that responds best in my experience is the one with pain of less than six months' duration, without significant tendon calcification on ultrasound, and with a good response to palpation of the Ah-shi point. When there is intense chronicity with marked structural change on ultrasound, I prefer to combine acupuncture and ESWT sequentially, and I have seen more consistent functional results with this combined approach.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology · 2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.10.001
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories