Acupuncture Analgesia: I. The Scientific Basis
Wang et al. · Anesthesia & Analgesia · 2008
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
To examine the neurobiologic mechanisms and scientific basis of acupuncture analgesia through neuroimaging studies
WHO
Studies in humans and animal models, including healthy volunteers and patients with chronic pain
DURATION
Review of 35 years of research (1973-2008)
POINTS
LI-4 (large intestine 4), ST-36 (stomach 36), GB-34 (gallbladder 34), LU-5 (lung 5)
🔬 Study Design
Neuroimaging studies
n=150
fMRI, PET, SPECT during acupuncture
Neurophysiologic studies
n=50
Analysis of neurotransmitters and endogenous opioids
📊 Results in numbers
Increase in pain threshold with acupuncture
Peak analgesic effect
Half-life of effect
Reversal by naloxone
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Central Nervous System Activation
This study shows that acupuncture truly works through scientifically proven mechanisms. During treatment, the brain releases natural substances similar to morphine (endorphins) that block pain. Imaging exams show that acupuncture activates specific brain areas related to pain control, particularly the limbic system and hypothalamus.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Acupuncture, an ancient practice originating in Chinese medicine, has been gaining growing recognition and acceptance in Western medicine as a treatment for chronic pain. Traditionally used for more than 3,000 years in Asian countries, this therapeutic technique involves the application of pressure, needle insertion, heat, and electrical stimulation at specific points on the body to restore balance and health. In the West, interest in acupuncture grew significantly after President Richard Nixon's visit to China in 1972, culminating in the official recognition of its efficacy by the National Institutes of Health in 1997 for the treatment of pain, nausea, and vomiting. Acupuncture is currently widely used in pain management programs, although the exact mechanisms of its analgesic action remained poorly understood until recently.
The objective of this review was to critically examine the available scientific literature on the neurobiologic mechanisms of acupuncture analgesia, using evidence from peer-reviewed basic and clinical research. The investigators analyzed neurophysiologic and neuroimaging studies to understand how acupuncture produces its analgesic effects in the central nervous system. The methodology included a review of experiments performed in human volunteers and animal models, as well as advanced neuroimaging studies such as positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. The focus was on understanding the scientific basis of acupuncture analgesia from a Western perspective, without attempting to translate traditional Chinese concepts such as Yin, Yang, and Qi.
The main findings revealed that acupuncture triggers a complex sequence of neurobiologic events in the central nervous system. Studies demonstrated that stimulation of acupuncture points activates specific afferent nerve fibers, which transmit signals to the spinal cord and subsequently to the brain. This process results in the release of multiple neurotransmitter substances and endogenous opioid peptides, including enkephalins, endorphins, and dynorphins, which are the body's natural analgesics. Experiments with naloxone, an opioid blocker, confirmed that the pain relief produced by acupuncture can be partially reversed, demonstrating the central role of these endogenous compounds.
Neuroimaging studies showed that acupuncture activates specific brain areas, particularly the limbic system, hypothalamus, and regions associated with pain processing, including the anterior cingulate cortex and the insula. Interestingly, it was found that different frequencies of electrical stimulation produce distinct effects: low frequency releases mainly enkephalins and beta-endorphins, while high frequency stimulates the release of dynorphin.
For patients and health care professionals, these findings have important clinical implications. First, they provide a solid scientific basis for the use of acupuncture as a legitimate treatment for pain, validating a practice that some still considered purely placebo. The results suggest that acupuncture works through real and measurable neurobiologic mechanisms, similar to those of conventional analgesics, but using the body's own natural pain-relief systems. For patients, this means a treatment option with the potential to reduce dependence on opioid medications, which can cause dependence and significant adverse effects.
The research also indicates that the sensation of "De Qi" — the feeling of numbness, heaviness, or tingling that patients frequently report during treatment — is associated with the activation of specific brain regions, suggesting that this sensory experience is a valid indicator that the treatment is working appropriately.
However, the study also identified several important limitations that should be considered. Many of the experiments were performed in animal models, and translation of these results to humans is not always straightforward. In addition, several studies in humans did not include adequate control groups with sham acupuncture, making it difficult to distinguish between specific effects of acupuncture and placebo effects. Neuroimaging techniques, although promising, are still in development, and results can vary across different laboratories because of methodologic differences.
The investigators also observed that tolerance develops to the effects of acupuncture with prolonged use, similar to what occurs with opioid medications, suggesting that treatment protocols should be carefully planned. Despite these limitations, the body of scientific evidence provides a solid basis for understanding how acupuncture works in pain treatment, paving the way for future research that may further optimize this ancient therapeutic art through modern scientific methods.
Strengths
- 1Comprehensive review of 35 years of research
- 2Use of advanced neuroimaging technologies
- 3Consistent evidence across multiple study models
- 4Clear identification of the neurophysiologic mechanisms
- 5Solid scientific basis for clinical practice
Limitations
- 1Many studies without adequate control groups
- 2Variability across laboratories in imaging methods
- 3Animal models may not fully reflect the human experience
- 4Need for protocol standardization
- 5Lack of direct correlation between imaging findings and clinical relevance
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
This 35-year review published in Anesthesia & Analgesia consolidates something many of us were already observing in practice but lacked robust neuroscientific underpinnings to defend before skeptical colleagues: acupuncture recruits endogenous pain modulation systems in a measurable and reproducible way. The fact that 80 to 90% of subjects show an elevated pain threshold, with peak analgesia between 20 and 40 minutes and a 16-minute half-life of effect, provides concrete parameters for structuring sessions and explaining to the patient the temporal curve of the response. Complete reversal by naloxone, in turn, settles debates about pure placebo effect and positions acupuncture as a pharmacologically coherent intervention in the context of pain medicine. Populations that particularly benefit include patients with chronic pain who have contraindications to or intolerance of opioids, those in opioid-tapering programs, and oncologic patients in supportive care.
▸ Notable Findings
The most elegant finding of this review is the frequency-dependent dissociation of the neuropeptides released: low-frequency stimulation preferentially recruits enkephalins and beta-endorphins, while high frequency induces dynorphin release. This distinction is not trivial — it provides a rationale for selecting electroacupuncture parameters according to the pain profile and the predominant pathophysiologic mechanism in each patient. Equally noteworthy is the activation pattern observed in neuroimaging studies: acupuncture modulates the limbic system, the hypothalamus, the anterior cingulate cortex, and the insula — precisely the structures involved in the affective-motivational dimension of chronic pain. This explains why patients report not only lower pain intensity but also less pain-associated suffering. The correlation between De Qi and the activation of these regions provides a neurobiologic substrate for a phenomenon that Asian clinical traditions have described for millennia.
▸ From My Experience
At the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, the frequency-dependent dissociation described in the article has long guided our selection of electroacupuncture parameters — we use low frequency (2 Hz) for syndromes with a predominantly inflammatory component and high frequency (100 Hz) in neuropathic or spastic conditions, an approach consistent with what this review systematizes. In terms of temporal response, I have observed that most patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain begin to report perceptible improvement between the third and fifth session, which aligns with the 20- to 40-minute window of peak analgesia — each session, to some extent, trains and amplifies the system. I usually structure initial protocols of 10 to 12 weekly sessions, followed by biweekly or monthly maintenance depending on the response. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with moderate central sensitization, without a severe somatization disorder component, who is motivated and clearly experiences De Qi from the first sessions. We routinely combine acupuncture with an exercise program and physical therapy, enhancing endogenous analgesia on multiple fronts.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Anesthesia & Analgesia · 2008
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000277493.42335.7b
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories