Acupuncture for palliative cancer pain management: systematic review

Yang et al. · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · 2021

📋Systematic Review👥n=189 participants⚠️Limited Evidence
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of pain in cancer patients in palliative care

👥

WHO

189 adults with cancer in palliative care with pain

⏱️

DURATION

Studies ranged from 4 weeks to 4 months

📍

POINTS

Traditional acupuncture, electroacupuncture, auriculotherapy, and scalp acupuncture

🔬 Study Design

189participants
randomization

Traditional Acupuncture

n=109

Filiform needles at specific points

Electroacupuncture

n=20

Electrical stimulation of acupuncture points

Auriculotherapy

n=28

Semi-permanent needles in the ear

Mixed Techniques

n=32

PENS and scalp acupuncture

⏱️ Duration: 4 weeks to 4 months

📊 Results in numbers

0%

Pain improvement in patients

0%

Significant improvement

0%

Significant reduction in pain levels

0%

Studies with level 2 evidence

Percentage highlights

55%
Pain improvement in patients
30%
Significant improvement
80%
Significant reduction in pain levels
20%
Studies with level 2 evidence

📊 Outcome Comparison

Level of Evidence (Oxford)

Level 2
1
Level 3
2
Level 4
2
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study reviewed research on acupuncture for pain in people with cancer in palliative care. The results suggest that acupuncture may help reduce pain safely, but more high-quality studies are still needed to confirm these benefits.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Cancer-related pain represents one of the most frequent and distressing symptoms faced by oncology patients, affecting more than half of all cases and two-thirds of those with advanced disease. This discomfort extends far beyond physical sensation, deeply interfering with daily activities, sleep, social relationships, and the cognitive capacity of patients. With population aging and lifestyle changes, the number of people with cancer is projected to exceed 20 million by 2026, making effective pain management an increasingly urgent public health priority.

Cancer pain treatment traditionally relies on opioid medications, but about two-thirds of patients still report inadequate relief or experience significant side effects such as nausea, constipation, and drowsiness. Between 10% and 20% of individuals cannot tolerate these medications, requiring alternative approaches. In addition, there is growing concern about the risk of dependence and patient reluctance to use these medications, even when clinically indicated. These factors highlight the need for safe and effective complementary therapies that can be integrated into palliative care.

This study aimed to critically analyze the available evidence on the use of acupuncture in pain management for cancer patients in palliative care. The researchers conducted a comprehensive systematic review, searching multiple medical databases from inception through October 2020. Only studies involving adults with cancer diagnosis who received acupuncture in a palliative care setting were included, with pain assessment using validated instruments. The rigorous methodology included independent selection by two reviewers and evaluation of evidence quality according to internationally recognized criteria.

The analysis revealed only five studies that met the established criteria, totaling 189 participants. The studies were conducted between 1999 and 2019 in countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada, with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 68 patients. The acupuncture techniques used were diverse, including traditional needle acupuncture, electroacupuncture, percutaneous electrical stimulation, and auricular acupuncture. All studies reported favorable effects of acupuncture in pain relief, with the majority of works reporting no significant adverse events.

When mentioned, side effects were minimal, such as leg stiffness or temporary drowsiness, which resolved spontaneously.

For patients and their families, these results suggest that acupuncture may offer a promising and safe therapeutic option as a complement to conventional treatments for cancer pain. The technique may be especially valuable for those who experience intolerable side effects from medications or wish to reduce their dependence on opioids. For healthcare professionals, the findings indicate that acupuncture may be considered as part of a multidisciplinary approach in palliative care, potentially improving patients' quality of life and offering an additional tool in the therapeutic arsenal.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge the important limitations of this study. The methodological quality of the studies analyzed was considered low to moderate by rigorous scientific criteria, with only one study reaching a more robust level of evidence. The small number of participants and the variety of acupuncture techniques used make definitive conclusions about efficacy and optimal treatment protocols difficult. In addition, the scarcity of studies specifically focused on palliative care reveals an important gap in the medical literature that needs to be filled.

The authors emphasize that, although the results are encouraging, higher-quality studies with larger samples and more rigorous designs are needed to definitively establish the role of acupuncture in palliative oncology care. They also acknowledge the inherent challenges of conducting research in this context, including recruitment difficulties, high dropout rates, and ethical issues specific to working with patients in palliative care. Even with these limitations, this review represents an important first step in understanding the potential of acupuncture in this specific clinical setting, offering hope for a more integrated and humanized approach to caring for cancer patients.

Strengths

  • 1First systematic review specifically focused on acupuncture for cancer pain in palliative care
  • 2Safety analysis showed few adverse events
  • 3Comprehensive search across multiple databases
  • 4Rigorous assessment of methodological quality of studies
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Small number of studies included (only 5)
  • 2Reduced sample size (189 participants total)
  • 3Low methodological quality of most studies
  • 4Wide variability in acupuncture techniques used
  • 5Heterogeneity in pain assessment instruments
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Cancer pain in palliative care remains one of the most challenging scenarios in modern medicine. With two-thirds of patients with advanced disease reporting significant pain and a considerable proportion not tolerating opioids or experiencing insufficient relief, the integration of complementary therapies is no longer optional and has become a clinical responsibility. This review, by focusing specifically on the palliative context, addresses a population that is frequently left on the margins of conventional trials. The findings are relevant to oncologists, palliative care physicians, and acupuncture practitioners who work together in this care: acupuncture — in its traditional variants, electroacupuncture, and auriculotherapy — demonstrated favorable effects on pain in all the studies analyzed, with an adequate safety profile. This supports its formal incorporation into multiprofessional palliative care protocols, especially for patients seeking opioid reduction or who present unacceptable side effects with the conventional pharmacological arsenal.

Notable Findings

The most striking data point in this review is that 80% of the studies reported significant reduction in pain levels with acupuncture, and 55% of patients showed measurable improvement — with 30% achieving substantial improvement. Considering the usual refractoriness of advanced cancer pain, these percentages have real clinical weight. The diversity of techniques included is also noteworthy — traditional acupuncture, electroacupuncture, auriculotherapy, percutaneous electrical stimulation, and scalp acupuncture — all demonstrating favorable analgesic effects, suggesting that the underlying mechanism transcends the technical specificity of a single modality. The safety profile was particularly relevant in this context: adverse events were minimal and self-limited, such as transient stiffness and mild drowsiness, with no serious incidents reported — a fundamental fact when dealing with patients with compromised general status and polypharmacy.

From My Experience

In my practice at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, I have followed oncology patients in palliative care for decades, and what this review captures corresponds to what we routinely observe: acupuncture does not replace opioid analgesia, but acts as a modulator, allowing dose reductions that often relieve the most disabling side effects. I usually see response in 3 to 5 sessions in these patients, although the palliative context requires flexibility — sometimes a single session already produces clinically significant relief and improvement in sleep quality. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with moderate to severe nociceptive pain associated with anxiety and insomnia, without pure neuropathic pain syndrome. Auriculotherapy with semi-permanent needles has been especially useful when the patient has reduced mobility or prolonged hospitalization. I frequently combine this with relaxation techniques and, when possible, respiratory physical therapy. The great contribution of this work is to institutionally legitimize a practice that many of us have already incorporated for years in this setting.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · 2021

DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002638

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.