Skip to content

A Biopsychosocial Model-Based Clinical Approach in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review

Koukoulithras et al. · Cureus · 2021

📖Narrative Review🧠Biopsychosocial ModelHolistic Approach

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Review the application of the biopsychosocial model in myofascial pain syndrome

👥

WHO

Patients with myofascial pain syndrome and trigger points

⏱️

DURATION

Narrative review of the scientific literature

📍

POINTS

Trigger points in specific muscles

🔬 Study Design

0participants
randomization

Review

n=0

Analysis of literature on the biopsychosocial model

⏱️ Duration: Narrative review

📊 Results in numbers

13.5-47%

Prevalence of chronic muscle pain

30-93%

Prevalence of MPS in musculoskeletal pain

0%

Prevalence of active trigger points

0%

Prevalence in older adults (>65 years)

Percentage highlights

13.5-47%
Prevalence of chronic muscle pain
30-93%
Prevalence of MPS in musculoskeletal pain
46.1%
Prevalence of active trigger points
85%
Prevalence in older adults (>65 years)

📊 Outcome Comparison

Prevalence by population

General
30
Older adults
85
💬 What does this mean for you?

This review shows that muscle pain (myofascial syndrome) is not just a physical problem, but also involves emotional and social aspects. The most effective treatment combines physical techniques such as dry needling and myofascial release with psychological care and social support for better quality of life.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most prevalent chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions, affecting between 13.5% and 47% of the world's population. This narrative review examines how the biopsychosocial model can revolutionize the therapeutic approach to this complex condition, integrating biological, psychological, and social factors into diagnosis and treatment. MPS is characterized by the presence of trigger points, which are taut, hypersensitive muscle bands capable of generating local and referred pain, restricted movement, and muscle weakness. Prevalence varies significantly, reaching 30-93% among patients with musculoskeletal pain and as high as 85% in older adults.

The pathophysiology of MPS involves the 'integrated hypothesis' of Mense and Simons, which proposes an abnormal increase in acetylcholine production at the neuromuscular junction. Muscle injuries, repetitive movements, poor posture, and stress amplify this mechanism, leading to increased motor end-plate activity, continuous calcium release, and sustained sarcomere shortening. This vicious cycle results in decreased muscle blood flow, tissue hypoxia, accumulation of metabolic byproducts, and local inflammation. The biopsychosocial model, proposed by Engel and Romano in 1977, demonstrates how biological factors interact with psychological and social aspects in the perpetuation of pain.

Studies reveal a strong correlation between genetic predisposition, polymorphisms in genes related to pain perception, hormonal differences between sexes, and pain sensitivity. Psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, stress, and catastrophizing activate brain regions associated with the emotional processing of pain, including the bilateral amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and hippocampus. Social isolation, low socioeconomic status, and insomnia also contribute to trigger point activation by reducing the descending pain modulatory system. Diagnosis is based on detailed physical examination, identifying palpable taut bands, local hypersensitivity, referred pain patterns, and the 'jump sign' — a characteristic behavioral response to pressure on the trigger point.

Clinical management integrates myofascial release techniques, ischemic compression, and dry needling with a pharmacologic approach including muscle relaxants, antidepressants, and anti-inflammatory drugs. Myofascial release applies prolonged pressure (120-300 seconds) directly or indirectly to restricted fascial layers, promoting changes in blood flow and removal of inflammatory mediators. Dry needling induces local mechanical depolarization, automatic contraction (twitch effect), and subsequent relaxation of muscle fibers. Treatment of psychosocial aspects includes management of depression with tricyclic antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive restructuring techniques to modify pain perception, social skills training, and problem-solving strategies.

Meditation contributes to mental relaxation, reduced cortisol levels, and activation of brain areas responsible for emotional regulation. Physical exercise increases muscle blood flow, facilitates the diffusion of pro-inflammatory markers, and provides essential metabolic resources for trigger point deactivation. The review proposes a holistic clinical protocol that considers mechanical stressors, nutritional deficiencies, biopsychosocial factors, and metabolic and endocrine inadequacies during evaluation. Personalized treatment, based on each patient's individual needs and grounded in the biopsychosocial model, demonstrates greater efficacy in improving function and quality of life.

Limitations include the heterogeneity of diagnostic criteria and the need for more randomized controlled studies to validate the proposed interventions.

Strengths

  • 1Holistic approach integrating biological, psychological, and social aspects
  • 2Comprehensive review of pathophysiology and mechanisms of myofascial pain
  • 3Proposed structured clinical protocol based on evidence
  • 4Consideration of genetic and individual factors in pain perception
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Narrative review without systematic analysis of the literature
  • 2Heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria for myofascial syndrome
  • 3Need for more controlled studies to validate the interventions
  • 4Significant variability in reported prevalence rates
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Myofascial pain syndrome occupies a disproportionate share of the outpatient volume in any pain and rehabilitation service, and these numbers — 30 to 93% of patients with musculoskeletal pain and prevalence reaching 85% in those over 65 — justify a robust diagnostic and therapeutic structure. What this review offers the clinician is precisely an operational framework: one moves beyond treating isolated trigger points and begins to manage the case within a model that simultaneously contemplates the neuromuscular substrate, the patient's psychological burden, and the social context. In chronic pain practice, ignoring depression, catastrophizing, or social isolation while applying dry needling is working against oneself — descending modulation compromised by these variables undoes much of the gain achieved with the physical intervention. Populations with MPS associated with fibromyalgia, post-COVID syndrome, or chronic occupational neck pain particularly benefit from this integrative reading.

Notable Findings

The articulation of the Mense and Simons integrated hypothesis with psychosocial determinants is the point of greatest conceptual density in the review. The cycle of motor end-plate hypersensitization — excess acetylcholine, sarcomere shortening, local hypoxia, and accumulation of inflammatory mediators — is already familiar, but the review makes clear how seemingly distant factors, such as genetic polymorphisms related to pain perception and hormonal differences between sexes, modulate the activation and maintenance of trigger points. Equally relevant is the description of the role of the amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and hippocampus in the emotional amplification of pain: this directly connects pathophysiologic reasoning to the indication of antidepressants and cognitive restructuring as components that are not adjunctive, but central, to treatment. The data showing that insomnia and low socioeconomic status reduce descending modulation closes a solid clinical argument for systematic psychosocial screening.

From My Experience

In my musculoskeletal pain clinic practice, I have observed that patients with MPS respond to dry needling within three to five sessions when the psychosocial component is controlled — but when there is untreated depression or high catastrophizing, the response drags on for ten sessions or more without consolidation. This pattern led our service to include routine screening with PHQ-9 and PCS before initiating the needling protocol. I usually combine dry needling with manual myofascial release and progressive eccentric exercise, escalating the load according to tolerance. In older adults, where the 85% prevalence reported here resonates with what I see daily, the pharmacologic approach with low-dose nighttime tricyclic antidepressants has frequently unblocked cases that stagnated with physical intervention alone. The profile that responds best is the patient with localized MPS, without established central sensitization and with good adherence to the cognitive-behavioral component — in these, I can discharge with a maintenance protocol within eight to twelve total sessions.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Cureus · 2021

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14737

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.