Acupuncture for postoperative pain of lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Zhang et al. · Medicine · 2022
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture for postoperative pain after lumbar disc herniation surgery
WHO
838 patients with postoperative pain after lumbar disc herniation surgery
DURATION
Treatments ranged from 14 to 28 days
POINTS
Specific points not detailed in the included studies
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture
n=423
Traditional acupuncture
Control
n=415
Medications or rehabilitation
📊 Results in numbers
Cure rate vs medications
Total effectiveness rate
Pain reduction (VAS)
Functional improvement (JOA)
Adverse events vs medications
📊 Outcome Comparison
Cure Rate
Pain Reduction (VAS)
This analysis of 10 studies showed that acupuncture is more effective than medications in reducing pain after lumbar disc herniation surgery. Patients who received acupuncture experienced greater pain relief, better functional recovery, and fewer side effects.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of postoperative pain after lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery, a condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Lumbar disc herniation is one of the leading causes of low back pain, affecting about 80% of the Western population at least once in their lifetime, with a higher incidence in women aged 40-69 years. Although surgical treatment is effective in relieving neural compression, many patients experience residual pain, recurrence of symptoms, and functional limitations during the postoperative period. The analysis included ten randomized clinical trials conducted in China between 2006 and 2021, involving 838 patients (423 in the acupuncture group and 415 in the control group).
The studies compared acupuncture with medications (nine studies) or rehabilitation (one study). The duration of treatment ranged from 14 to 28 days, with a predominant frequency of one session per day. Primary outcomes included cure rate, total effectiveness rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The results demonstrated significant superiority of acupuncture across all parameters evaluated.
The cure rate was 2.24 times higher in the acupuncture group compared with medications (OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.58-3.19, P<0.00001). The total effectiveness rate showed even more pronounced benefit, with an odds ratio of 4.85 (95% CI=2.59-9.08, P<0.00001) favoring acupuncture. Regarding pain, acupuncture provided a mean reduction of 1.26 points on the VAS compared with control (MD=-1.26, 95% CI=-1.72 to -0.79, P<0.00001). Functional improvement, measured by the JOA score, was 4.21 points higher in the acupuncture group (MD=4.21, 95% CI=1.53-6.90, P<0.00001).
Particularly relevant was the safety analysis, where acupuncture demonstrated significantly lower incidence of adverse events compared with medications (OR=0.27, 95% CI=0.11-0.62, P=0.002). Reported adverse events included worsening of pain, urinary retention, postoperative infection, and lower-limb venous thrombosis. Proposed mechanisms for the analgesic effects of acupuncture include neuroendocrine modulation, increased production of endogenous opioid peptides, reduction of inflammatory mediators (substance P, TNF-α, IL-1β), and activation of local molecular signaling pathways. Acupuncture has also been shown to improve blood flow and oxygenation of the cauda equina, nerve roots, and sciatic nerve, promoting neural recovery.
Limitations of the study include moderate methodological quality of the included trials, with only six studies describing adequate randomization methods and none using allocation concealment or placebo control. All studies were conducted in China, limiting the geographic and ethnic generalizability of the results. The relatively small sample size and the use of efficacy criteria not internationally recognized also represent limitations. Despite these limitations, the meta-analysis provides convincing evidence that acupuncture is an effective and safe intervention for postoperative pain after lumbar disc herniation surgery.
The benefits include superior pain control, better functional recovery, and a more favorable safety profile compared with conventional treatments. These findings support the incorporation of acupuncture as a therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary management of patients with postoperative LDH pain, especially considering its nonpharmacological nature and low risk of adverse effects.
Strengths
- 1Comprehensive analysis across multiple databases
- 2Substantial total sample of 838 patients
- 3Consistent assessment of multiple outcomes
- 4Detailed safety analysis
- 5Statistical methods appropriate for heterogeneity
Limitations
- 1Moderate methodological quality of studies
- 2Lack of allocation concealment
- 3All studies conducted in China
- 4Lack of placebo controls
- 5Small sample size in individual studies
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
The management of residual pain after lumbar discectomy is one of the most frustrating problems we encounter in rehabilitation and pain clinics. Many patients undergo surgery expecting complete resolution and are confronted with persistent pain that compromises adherence to physical therapy, delays return to activities, and promotes deconditioning. This meta-analysis, gathering 838 patients across ten randomized trials, offers concrete data to support the inclusion of acupuncture in the early postoperative protocol, as an adjunct to conventional analgesics. The mean 1.26-point reduction on the VAS and the 4.21-point gain in the JOA are clinically meaningful in this context, especially when combined with a safety profile superior to systemic medications — odds ratio of adverse events of only 0.27. Populations with relative contraindications to anti-inflammatory drugs or who are opioid-dependent are priority candidates for this type of integration.
▸ Notable Findings
The most striking finding is not just the pain reduction, but the magnitude of the total effectiveness rate — OR of 4.85 — which suggests that the benefit of acupuncture transcends point-specific analgesia and encompasses broader functional recovery, consistent with the substantial gain in the JOA score. Mechanistically, the authors highlight neuroendocrine modulation, release of endogenous opioid peptides, and reduction of pro-inflammatory mediators such as substance P, TNF-α, and IL-1β — a cascade that aligns well with the neurophysiology of central sensitization frequently observed after neural decompression surgery. Another valuable finding is the improvement in cauda equina and nerve root perfusion reported in the studies, which may explain part of the neurological recovery beyond the strictly analgesic effect. The 14- to 28-day treatment window positions acupuncture as a feasible intervention as early as the late hospital phase or the immediate outpatient postoperative period.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, I usually introduce acupuncture between the second and fourth postoperative weeks, as soon as the patient has sufficient mobility to tolerate the prone or lateral decubitus position. The initial response — noticeable reduction of residual radicular pain — generally appears between the third and fifth sessions, which is consistent with the central modulation mechanisms described in this review. I typically work with a cycle of eight to twelve sessions in the acute phase, followed by biweekly maintenance if there is risk of chronification. I routinely combine this with supervised neural mobilization and lumbar stabilizer strengthening — acupuncture seems to facilitate the window of adherence to physical therapy by reducing movement-related pain. I have greater reservations in patients with longstanding failed back surgery syndrome, in whom central sensitization is already consolidated and the response tends to be more partial and transient. The profile that responds best, in my observation over the years, is the patient with recent-onset residual radicular pain, without a history of multiple prior surgeries.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Medicine · 2022
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032016
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories