Acupuncture needling sensation: The neural correlates of deqi using fMRI
Asghar et al. · Brain Research · 2010
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To investigate the neural correlates of the deqi sensation versus acute pain in acupuncture using functional magnetic resonance imaging
WHO
17 healthy right-handed adults, inexperienced with acupuncture (8 men, 9 women, mean age 36 years)
DURATION
16 minutes per session, with two 2-minute stimulation periods each
POINTS
LI-4 (Hegu) on the right side, with superficial (1-2 mm) and deep (8-12 mm) needling
🔬 Study Design
Deqi Group
n=10
Needling predominantly producing deqi sensations
Pain Group
n=7
Needling predominantly producing acute pain sensations
📊 Results in numbers
Deactivations in the deqi group
Pain group
Deqi > pain contrast
Structures affected
📊 Outcome Comparison
Brain response pattern
This study found that the traditional deqi sensation in acupuncture affects the brain differently from acute pain. When participants felt deqi, certain areas of the brain related to pain and emotion decreased their activity, suggesting a possible mechanism for the therapeutic effects of acupuncture.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This pioneering study investigated the neural bases of the deqi sensation, considered fundamental in the traditional practice of acupuncture, using functional magnetic resonance imaging to map brain activity during different types of needle stimulation. The research was motivated by the importance acupuncturists attribute to obtaining deqi during treatment, although the underlying neurologic mechanisms remained poorly understood. The researchers recruited 17 healthy adults with no prior experience with acupuncture and performed needling at LI-4 (Hegu) on the right side, varying the depth between superficial (1-2 mm) and deep (8-12 mm). During the 16-minute sessions, participants underwent two 2-minute stimulation periods, with needle rotation at 2 Hz, while their brain activity was monitored by fMRI.
After each session, participants rated their sensations using a standardized questionnaire that differentiated between deqi sensations (such as numbness, heaviness, irradiation) and acute pain (such as burning, prickling, electric shock). The results revealed distinct neural patterns between the two types of sensation. When deqi sensations predominated, the brain showed only deactivations (decrease in BOLD signal) without significant activations, particularly in limbic and subcortical structures such as the hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, and insula, as well as the cerebellum. In contrast, when acute pain sensations predominated, a combination of brain activations and deactivations was observed.
Direct comparative analysis between deqi and pain revealed that brain areas involved in pain and emotion processing showed lower activity during deqi compared with acute pain. These findings have important implications for understanding the therapeutic mechanisms of acupuncture. Deactivations in limbic and subcortical structures during deqi may represent a neurologic mechanism by which acupuncture produces its analgesic and therapeutic effects. The involvement of these areas, known to process pain, emotion, and stress, suggests that deqi may modulate neural circuits in a beneficial way.
The study demonstrates the importance of considering specific needle sensations in neuroimaging research on acupuncture, as different sensations produce distinct neural patterns that may confound results if not adequately controlled. Limitations include the relatively small sample size, the use of healthy participants without clinical conditions, and an experimental protocol that may not fully reflect real clinical practice. In addition, the prolonged stimulation periods (2 minutes) may have contributed to the pain sensations reported by participants. Despite these limitations, the study provides objective neurologic evidence for the traditional distinction between deqi and pain in acupuncture, offering a scientific basis for established clinical practices and direction for future research on acupuncture mechanisms.
Strengths
- 1First systematic neurologic investigation of deqi versus acute pain sensations
- 2Use of validated questionnaires for sensation classification
- 3Rigorous neuroimaging methodology with conservative statistical analysis
- 4Controlled protocol with different needling depths
Limitations
- 1Small sample size (n = 17) limiting statistical power
- 2Use of only healthy participants, limiting clinical generalizability
- 3Experimental protocol may not reflect real clinical practice
- 4Prolonged stimulation duration may influence sensations
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Functional mapping of deqi by magnetic resonance imaging offers a concrete neurobiologic basis for one of the oldest distinctions in clinical acupuncture practice: the difference between therapeutic sensation and iatrogenic pain. When we teach residents at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, we insist that obtaining deqi is not provoking pain — and this work demonstrates, with neuroimaging evidence, that these two experiences recruit fundamentally distinct brain circuits. The deactivations in limbic and subcortical structures — hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, and insula — during deqi are particularly relevant for patients with chronic pain, comorbid anxiety, or central sensitization syndrome, populations in which modulation of these networks has direct and measurable therapeutic impact. For the physician who incorporates acupuncture into the multimodal arsenal, this article reinforces that the quality of stimulation — and not just the location of the point — is a critical clinical variable.
▸ Notable Findings
The most striking finding is the radical asymmetry between the brain response patterns: deqi produced exclusively BOLD signal deactivations, with no significant activation, while acute pain generated a mixed pattern of activations and deactivations. This suggests that deqi is not simply a milder variant of pain, but a qualitatively distinct neurologic state. The involvement of the cerebellum in deqi-related deactivations is an unexpected and noteworthy finding — a structure often neglected in discussions about acupuncture, but increasingly recognized as a modulator of autonomic and emotional responses. The direct deqi versus pain contrast, revealing exclusively negative Z values in pain- and emotion-processing areas, establishes a clear neural hierarchy: deqi suppresses networks that acute pain excites, which is mechanistically coherent with the analgesic and anxiolytic effects observed clinically with the technique.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice, the distinction between deqi and pain has never been merely semantic — it is what separates a therapeutic session from an aversive experience that compromises adherence. I have observed that patients new to acupuncture frequently confuse the two sensations in the first sessions, and part of the clinical work is to educate that perception. With patients presenting central sensitization, such as fibromyalgia patients or those with chronic lumbosacral pain, I usually start with milder stimulation at LI-4 and distal points, progressively adjusting the intensity. In general, I perceive a consistent analgesic response from the third or fourth session onward, and we usually work with cycles of eight to twelve sessions before reassessing. The combination with supervised physical exercise and psychotherapy potentiates the results, especially in cases with a prominent emotional component — which, in light of this article, makes neurobiologic sense given the amygdalar involvement. Very anxious patients in relation to the needle rarely reach adequate deqi in the initial sessions; in this profile, I prefer to combine it with relaxation techniques before needling.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Brain Research · 2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.019
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories