Acupuncture as an adjunct to exercise based physiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the knee: randomised controlled trial
Foster et al. · BMJ · 2007
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
To investigate whether adding acupuncture to standard treatment with exercise and advice improves pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis
WHO
352 adults aged 50+ with clinical diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis
DURATION
6 weeks of treatment with follow-up through 12 months
POINTS
6-10 points per session: local (ST-34, ST-35, ST-36, SP-9, SP-10, GB-34) and distal (LI-4, TE-5, SP-6, LR-3)
🔬 Study Design
Advice + Exercise
n=116
6-session physical therapy program with exercise and advice
Advice + Exercise + True Acupuncture
n=117
Standard program plus acupuncture with needle penetration
Advice + Exercise + Non-penetrating Acupuncture
n=119
Standard program plus sham acupuncture (blunt needles)
📊 Results in numbers
Pain reduction at 6 months (control group)
Pain reduction at 6 months (true acupuncture)
Pain reduction at 6 months (non-penetrating acupuncture)
Follow-up rate at 6 months
Between-group difference (true vs control)
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
WOMAC pain reduction (6 months)
This study tested whether adding acupuncture to standard exercise-based treatment would help more people with knee arthritis. The results showed that acupuncture did not bring significant additional benefits in pain reduction, suggesting that a good supervised exercise program may be sufficient for symptom relief.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This randomized controlled trial, published in the prestigious British Medical Journal, investigated an important practical question for knee osteoarthritis treatment: whether adding acupuncture to an exercise-based physical therapy program would provide additional benefits for patients. The study was conducted between 2003 and 2005 across 37 physical therapy centers in the United Kingdom, reflecting real-world clinical practice within the British healthcare system. The researchers enrolled 352 adults aged 50 or older who had clinical diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis and had been referred by their family physicians for physical therapy. Participants were randomized into three groups: a control group that received only advice and exercise (n=116), a group that received standard treatment plus true acupuncture (n=117), and a third group that received standard treatment plus non-penetrating acupuncture, using blunt-tipped needles that created the illusion of insertion (n=119).
The treatment program consisted of up to 6 sessions of 30 minutes over 6 weeks, including individualized strengthening, stretching, and balance exercises, plus a home exercise program. Acupuncture, when applied, used between 6 and 10 points per session, combining local points (such as ST-34, ST-35, ST-36, SP-9, SP-10, GB-34) and distal points (LI-4, TE-5, SP-6, LR-3), following Traditional Chinese Medicine protocols. The practitioners involved were experienced and trained in acupuncture according to national standards. The primary outcome was change in the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) pain subscale score at 6 months.
The results were surprising and challenged common expectations about acupuncture efficacy. At 6 months, mean reductions in pain score were virtually identical between groups: 2.28 points for the control group, 2.32 for true acupuncture, and 2.53 for non-penetrating acupuncture. Differences between the groups that received acupuncture and the control group were clinically insignificant: 0.08 points for true acupuncture and 0.25 points for non-penetrating acupuncture, with confidence intervals that included zero. Interestingly, some small benefits were observed on secondary measures of pain intensity and discomfort, but these were more consistent and durable in the non-penetrating acupuncture group than in the true acupuncture group.
This finding suggests that the benefits observed were not due to specific effects of needle insertion or eliciting the qi sensation, but possibly to nonspecific factors such as patient expectations, additional therapist attention, or placebo effects. The study had several important methodological strengths: appropriately blinded randomization, excellent follow-up rates (94% at 6 months), high protocol adherence, and use of a credible placebo control. Participants who received non-penetrating acupuncture could not distinguish their treatment from true acupuncture, confirming successful blinding. In addition, the control group that received only exercise and advice had a notably high response rate (43% at 6 months by OMERACT-OARSI criteria), much higher than observed in previous studies, indicating that the physical therapy program was particularly effective.
The clinical implications are significant. The study suggests that when acupuncture is added to a well-structured and effective physical therapy program, it does not offer clinically relevant additional benefits. This is important because it raises questions about the cost-benefit ratio of integrating acupuncture into conventional care for knee osteoarthritis, especially considering that the exercise program alone already demonstrated substantial efficacy. Limitations include the use of only 6 acupuncture sessions, fewer than in some previous studies, although this number reflects typical practice in the British healthcare system.
In addition, the study included patients with clinical diagnosis, not necessarily confirmed radiographically, which better reflects real clinical practice but may include some conditions beyond osteoarthritis.
Strengths
- 1Robust methodological design with credible placebo control
- 2Excellent follow-up rates (94% at 6 months)
- 3Sample representative of real clinical practice
- 4Appropriately blinded randomization
- 5Highly effective physical therapy protocol as comparator
Limitations
- 1Number of acupuncture sessions lower than some international studies
- 2Diagnosis based on clinical, not radiographic, criteria
- 3Physical therapists not blinded to the intervention
- 4Possible acupressure effect in the placebo group
- 5Fixed protocol may not reflect optimal acupuncture personalization
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
This BMJ trial puts into perspective a question that emerges routinely in pain and rehabilitation services: when a supervised exercise program is already working well, does acupuncture add real therapeutic value? The study answers clearly that in this specific context, it does not. For the physiatrist treating patients with knee osteoarthritis referred from primary care, the most operational data point is that the exercise-only arm achieved pain reduction comparable to true acupuncture, with an OMERACT-OARSI response rate of 43% at six months — an impressive number for an active comparator. This reinforces the therapeutic hierarchy: structured therapeutic exercise remains the backbone of conservative management of knee osteoarthritis, and any adjuvant should be evaluated incrementally on top of this already effective base.
▸ Notable Findings
The most thought-provoking finding of this trial is not the equivalence between true acupuncture and control, but rather the performance of the non-penetrating acupuncture group, which produced pain reductions marginally superior to true needle-inserting acupuncture — 2.53 versus 2.32 on the WOMAC scale — and more consistent effects on secondary measures of intensity and discomfort. This indicates that nonspecific mechanisms — structured therapist attention, patient expectation, ritualistic contact with the skin — contribute meaningfully to the total effect observed with acupuncture in populations with moderate osteoarthritis. The difference between true acupuncture and control was only 0.08 points, with a confidence interval overlapping zero, ruling out any clinically significant specific effect of needle insertion in this context.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the Pain Center, I have observed that patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis who arrive already engaged in an exercise program respond quite differently from sedentary patients who use acupuncture as a primary intervention. In the latter, I typically see perceptible response in three to five sessions, especially when I associate classic local points with dry needling of trigger points in the vastus medialis and biceps femoris. For the patient profile of this trial — over 50 years old, chronic pain, already in physical therapy — acupuncture alone rarely makes a substantive difference beyond what exercise already provides. The article's finding is consistent with what I see routinely: the increment over a well-conducted exercise protocol is modest. For this reason, I reserve acupuncture as an adjuvant mainly for cases with a pain component that hinders exercise adherence in the initial phase, or for patients with NSAID contraindications who need an analgesic window to progress in functional rehabilitation.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
BMJ · 2007
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39280.509803.BE
Access original articleThis study underpins the editorial content of the site.
Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.
Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories