Skip to content

A Narrative Review of the Efficacy of Acupuncture in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Cancer Patients

Chen et al. · Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine · 2026

📚Narrative Review👥n = 1,174 participantsHigh clinical impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in oncology patients

👥

WHO

Cancer patients developing neuropathy after taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy

⏱️

DURATION

Protocols of 4-12 weeks with 2-3 sessions per week

📍

POINTS

ST-36 (Zusanli), LI-4 (Hegu), SP-6 (Sanyinjiao), GB-34, Huatuojiaji points

🔬 Study Design

1174participants
randomization

Acupuncture

n=587

Traditional acupuncture or electroacupuncture

Control

n=587

Standard medication or sham acupuncture

⏱️ Duration: Review of 19 randomized controlled trials through 2024

📊 Results in numbers

Significant

Improvement in neuropathic pain

Significant

Enhanced sensory function

Improvement greater than controls

Quality of life

Better profile than duloxetine

Safety

📊 Outcome Comparison

Efficacy in pain relief

Acupuncture
80
Standard medication
60

Adverse effects

Acupuncture
15
Duloxetine
45
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that acupuncture can be a safe and effective alternative for treating the numbness and pain in the hands and feet caused by chemotherapy. The results suggest that acupuncture works better than some standard medications, with fewer side effects.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This narrative review examines the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a debilitating complication affecting 19-85% of oncology patients. CIPN manifests as pain, numbness, and tingling in the extremities, significantly impacting quality of life and potentially leading to reduced chemotherapy doses or treatment discontinuation. The authors analyzed 19 randomized controlled trials enrolling 1,174 participants, showing that acupuncture provides significant improvements in CIPN symptoms compared with conventional medications such as duloxetine and gabapentin. The methodology included searches of major databases for studies published through 2024, focusing on the impact of acupuncture on pain relief, neurologic function, and quality of life.

Proposed mechanisms of action involve modulation of endogenous opioids, particularly β-endorphins and enkephalins that bind to μ- and δ-opioid receptors, in addition to regulation of neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine. Acupuncture also activates brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), promoting neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and neurogenesis. The optimal protocols identified involved 2-3 sessions per week for 4-12 weeks, using specific points such as ST-36 (Zusanli), LI-4 (Hegu), and SP-6 (Sanyinjiao). Electroacupuncture showed superior efficacy compared with traditional acupuncture.

The results showed that acupuncture was particularly effective for CIPN induced by taxanes (such as paclitaxel) and platinum-based agents (such as oxaliplatin), offering both preventive benefits when applied during chemotherapy and therapeutic benefits for established symptoms. The intervention demonstrated a better safety profile compared with conventional medications, with lower incidence of adverse effects and greater patient satisfaction. The studies showed consistent improvements in neuropathic pain, sensory function, and overall quality of life. Identified limitations include heterogeneity of acupuncture protocols across studies, small sample sizes in some trials, and methodologic difficulties inherent in blinding for acupuncture studies.

The authors emphasize the need for standardization of protocols and conducting larger and higher-quality clinical trials. Clinical implications suggest that acupuncture can be integrated as adjunctive therapy in the multimodal management of CIPN, potentially reducing dependence on medications with significant side effects. Current evidence positions acupuncture as a promising therapeutic option, especially considering its safety and well-grounded neurobiologic mechanisms.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive analysis of 19 RCTs with a robust total sample
  • 2Evidence of multiple well-grounded neurobiologic mechanisms
  • 3Demonstration of safety superiority compared with conventional medications
  • 4Well-defined protocols with specific acupuncture points and optimized frequency
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Significant heterogeneity of acupuncture protocols across studies
  • 2Methodologic difficulties in blinding inherent to acupuncture studies
  • 3Small sample sizes in some individual trials
  • 4Limited evidence for vinca-alkaloid-induced neuropathy
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy represents one of the most frustrating challenges in contemporary supportive oncology, affecting between 19% and 85% of patients and compromising not only quality of life but the very continuity of oncologic treatment. This review of 19 randomized controlled trials with 1,174 participants consolidates acupuncture as a legitimate adjunctive therapeutic option, especially for patients receiving taxanes and platinum derivatives — precisely the regimens most frequent in our oncology clinics. The safety superiority over duloxetine and gabapentin is clinically relevant: in patients who are already on multiple medications, often with compromised renal function and complex polypharmacy, each additional drug represents additional risk. The protocol of 2-3 sessions per week for 4-12 weeks is operationally feasible within integrated pain and oncology services, allowing scheduling concurrent with the chemotherapy cycle.

Notable Findings

Two findings deserve particular attention in this review. First, the efficacy of acupuncture is both preventive and therapeutic — that is, intervention started during chemotherapy reduces the onset of CIPN, while applied to established cases it also produces consistent symptomatic improvement. This duality of intervention windows considerably broadens the clinical indications. Second, the superiority of electroacupuncture over conventional manual acupuncture for outcomes of neuropathic pain and sensory function points to a dose-dependent stimulation mechanism, consistent with what we know about recruitment of β-endorphins, enkephalins, and BDNF activation. The points ST-36, LI-4, and SP-6 — classically associated with systemic modulation of pain and strengthening of defensive Qi — appear as anchors of the most effective protocols, converging with decades of clinical use grounded in classical Chinese medicine and now supported by measurable neurobiologic mechanisms.

From My Experience

At the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, I have been following patients with CIPN for many years, and what this review describes strongly resonates with what we observe in practice. I typically initiate acupuncture preferentially during chemotherapy cycles, especially in oxaliplatin regimens, where acute cold neuropathy appears early and frightens the patient — and in this context I see a response as early as the first 3-4 sessions, especially in the intensity of cold allodynia. For established cases, I usually work with 8-12 sessions before reassessing maintenance. Electroacupuncture has been my preference in denser neuropathies, with 2 Hz frequency for predominantly endorphinergic modulation. I almost always combine this with guidance on adapted physical activity and, when there is an important anxiety component, with autonomic regulation techniques. Patients with CIPN from paclitaxel respond well; those with vincristine-induced neuropathy, in my experience, have a less predictable response — something this review also recognizes by noting the more limited evidence for vinca alkaloids.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine · 2026

DOI: 10.1177/2515690X251411764

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.