The Use of Acupuncture for Plantar Heel Pain: a systematic review
Clark et al. · Acupuncture in Medicine · 2013
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Evaluate the scientific evidence on the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of heel pain (plantar fasciitis)
WHO
Patients with plantar heel pain of various durations and ages
DURATION
Studies including treatments of 4 to 16 sessions with follow-up up to 6 months
POINTS
PC-7, LI-4, GB-39, BL-60, BL-61, KI-3, ashi points and trigger points
🔬 Study Design
True acupuncture
n=450
Specific acupuncture points
Control/comparison
n=450
Sham acupuncture, medications, or other therapies
📊 Results in numbers
Pain reduction with PC-7 vs LI-4
Significant improvement with acupuncture + standard treatment
Positive response rate
Evidence classified as
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Pain reduction (0-100% scale)
This scientific review analyzed eight studies on the use of acupuncture to treat heel pain (plantar fasciitis). The results show that acupuncture may be effective in reducing pain, especially when combined with conventional treatments. The evidence is comparable to that of other treatments already accepted in medicine, such as stretching exercises and anti-inflammatory drugs.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Heel pain, technically known as plantar fasciitis or plantar heel pain, represents one of the most common problems encountered in medical and podiatric practice. This condition affects millions of people worldwide, causing not only significant physical discomfort but also major limitations in daily activities and substantial costs to healthcare systems. The typical clinical picture includes intense pain in the first steps in the morning, worsening with body weight, and tenderness on palpation in the heel bone region. Despite its high prevalence, the treatment of this condition remains a challenge, since conventional approaches frequently produce inconsistent results and may be associated with significant side effects.
The present study constitutes a comprehensive systematic review that investigated the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of plantar heel pain. The researchers conducted an extensive search across multiple scientific databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, and other specialized sources, covering publications from the start of records through the end of 2011. The methodology employed was rigorous, following internationally recognized protocols and registered in PROSPERO, an international database of systematic reviews. The authors specifically analyzed randomized controlled trials and comparative studies, evaluating methodological quality through validated instruments such as CONSORT, STRICTA, and the Downs & Black Quality Index.
Eight studies that met the inclusion criteria were included: five randomized clinical trials and three comparative studies, totaling more than one thousand participants with different demographic characteristics and symptom durations.
The results obtained demonstrated promising evidence for the use of acupuncture in the treatment of plantar heel pain. The study with the highest methodological quality, conducted by Zhang and colleagues in China, revealed that the acupuncture point PC-7 (located on the wrist) was significantly more effective than point LI-4 for relieving heel pain, maintaining benefits for up to six months after treatment. Another well-designed study, conducted in Greece by Karagounis and colleagues, demonstrated that the addition of acupuncture to conventional treatment (including anti-inflammatory medications, ice, and stretching exercises) resulted in nearly twice the improvement compared with standard treatment alone. While the group that received only conventional treatment showed a 26% reduction in pain, the group that received additional acupuncture achieved 47% improvement.
Additional studies suggested benefits with different approaches, including electroacupuncture applied at local and classic points, as well as the use of infrared laser at specific points.
The clinical implications of these findings are significant for both patients and healthcare professionals. Acupuncture emerges as a valid therapeutic option that can be considered alone or in combination with conventional treatments for plantar heel pain. The level of evidence found (levels I-II) is comparable to that available for conventionally used interventions, such as stretching exercises, night splints, or corticosteroid injections, but potentially with a lower risk of adverse effects. For patients, this means an additional treatment alternative, especially valuable considering that many conventional approaches have limited adherence due to side effects or discomfort.
For healthcare professionals, the results suggest that acupuncture should be included in treatment recommendations for this condition, offering an additional therapeutic tool in their clinical arsenal.
However, the review also identified important limitations that must be considered when interpreting the results. The significant heterogeneity among the studies represents the main challenge, with considerable variations in the diagnostic criteria used, the acupuncture techniques employed, the populations studied, and the outcome measures evaluated. Some studies included only male patients, while others showed a more balanced gender distribution. The duration of symptoms varied dramatically among participants, from a few days to 30 years, and one study suggested that treatment efficacy may be inversely related to symptom duration.
In addition, the methodological quality of the studies was variable, with only two studies meeting standards of excellence, while others showed significant limitations in aspects such as adequate blinding, bias control, and transparency in reporting methods. The possibility of publication bias must also be considered, especially considering that several studies were published in journals specializing in acupuncture, where there may be a tendency to favor positive results. Despite these limitations, the findings provide a solid basis for considering acupuncture as a legitimate therapeutic option for plantar heel pain, with the caveat that future research with greater methodological uniformity and larger samples will be needed to establish more precise treatment protocols and identify which patients would benefit most from this therapeutic approach.
Strengths
- 1Systematic review registered with the PROSPERO protocol
- 2Inclusion of good-quality randomized controlled trials
- 3Rigorous evaluation using CONSORT, STRICTA, and Quality Index scales
- 4Level I-II evidence comparable to conventional treatments
Limitations
- 1Considerable heterogeneity among the included studies
- 2Different acupuncture approaches used
- 3Inability to perform meta-analysis due to methodological differences
- 4Variable quality of the included studies
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common diagnoses in musculoskeletal rehabilitation services, and the search for options that complement stretching, orthoses, and analgesic blocks is a real demand of clinical practice. This systematic review, registered with PROSPERO and evaluated with CONSORT, STRICTA, and the Downs & Black Index, carries enough methodological weight to support therapeutic decisions. The finding that acupuncture added to standard treatment doubled the pain reduction compared with conventional therapy alone places this modality on the same level of evidence as widely used resources, such as night splints and repeated corticosteroid injections. Patients with first-step pain, NSAID failure, or contraindication to repeated injections are natural candidates for this therapeutic integration, especially in pain and physical medicine services where the multimodal arsenal is already the norm.
▸ Notable Findings
The superiority of point PC-7 over LI-4 — 47% versus 26% pain reduction — with maintenance of benefits for up to six months deserves special attention. The logic of using a distant point on the wrist for a complaint in the heel reflects principles of classical acupuncture that often surprise those coming from a purely local bias, but that find a parallel in the mechanisms of descending pain modulation via the cortex-periaqueductal axis. The consolidated positive response rate of 73.5% across the entire sample, combined with evidence classified at level I-II, is data that places acupuncture above the usual threshold of clinical consideration. The fact that electroacupuncture and laser at specific points also showed benefits suggests that neurophysiological modulation, more than the exact location of the needle, may be the central mechanism.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in the musculoskeletal pain outpatient clinic, plantar fasciitis is one of the conditions where I have observed the earliest response to acupuncture — I usually see perceptible relief within the first three or four sessions, which strongly favors adherence. The protocol I usually use combines needling at distal points, such as PC-7 and points on the corresponding meridian chain, with local needling on the plantar fascia and trigger points of the gastrocnemius and soleus, combined with a prescription for eccentric exercises and a viscoelastic insole. On average, I conduct eight to ten sessions until stabilization, with re-evaluation for monthly maintenance in cases of frequent recurrence. I am cautious about indicating acupuncture as monotherapy in cases with more than two years of evolution, given the article's signal that symptom duration may modulate the response — in these patients I prefer the combined approach from the start. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the active adult with pain of six to eighteen months, without associated peripheral neurological comorbidities.
Indexed scientific article
This study is indexed in an international scientific database. Check your institutional access to obtain the full article.
Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories