Role of Acupuncture in the Treatment or Prevention of Migraine, Tension-Type Headache, or Chronic Headache Disorders
Coeytaux et al. · Headache · 2016
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment and prevention of migraine, tension-type headache, and chronic headaches
WHO
Patients with migraine (4,985), tension-type headache (2,349), and other types of headache
DURATION
Follow-up from 2 to more than 6 months after randomization
POINTS
Not specified — analysis of multiple acupuncture protocols
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture
n=3667
true acupuncture for 8+ weeks
Control
n=3667
routine care, sham acupuncture, or prophylactic medications
📊 Results in numbers
Frequency reduction - migraine vs routine care
Clinical response ≥50% - tension-type headache
Effect on chronic pain vs sham
Fewer dropouts due to adverse effects
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Efficacy at 2 months
This scientific review analyzed dozens of studies and showed that acupuncture is effective for treating and preventing migraines and tension headaches. The results indicate that acupuncture works better than usual medical care alone and may be a valuable option, especially for those who do not tolerate preventive medications well.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This comprehensive review examines current scientific evidence on the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment and prevention of headache disorders, including migraine, tension-type headache, and chronic headaches. The study synthesizes findings from Cochrane systematic reviews and individual patient data meta-analyses, representing one of the most robust analyses available on this topic. For migraine, the researchers analyzed 22 randomized controlled trials involving 4,985 participants, with acupuncture interventions lasting at least 8 weeks. Comparisons included acupuncture versus routine care, sham acupuncture, and established prophylactic medications such as metoprolol and flunarizine.
The results demonstrated that acupuncture was statistically superior to routine care and to drug treatment at 2 months post-randomization both in headache frequency and in clinical response (reduction of at least 50% in frequency). Acupuncture also showed advantages over sham acupuncture, although with statistical heterogeneity across studies. For tension-type headache, the analysis included 12 studies with 2,349 patients. Acupuncture demonstrated statistically significant superiority over routine care and sham acupuncture at multiple follow-up periods (2, 3-4, and 5-6 months), both for clinical response and for reduction in the number of headache days.
A particularly important individual patient data meta-analysis, conducted by Vickers and colleagues, analyzed 29 randomized controlled trials covering several chronic pain conditions, including headache. This study demonstrated a statistically significant effect size for acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture (coefficient 0.38; 95% CI: 0.22-0.55), providing robust evidence that the effects of acupuncture transcend placebo effects. Additional studies not included in the main reviews also contribute to the evidence, showing superiority of acupuncture over sham acupuncture for acute migraine attacks and equivalence or superiority to topiramate in the prophylaxis of chronic migraine. Cost-effectiveness analyses conducted in the United Kingdom and Germany suggest that acupuncture represents a cost-effective therapeutic option in these countries, although similar data for the United States are limited.
The authors acknowledge important limitations, including heterogeneity in the definition and reporting of outcomes across studies, and the unresolved question of the contribution of placebo effects to the observed clinical efficacy. However, the evidence is consistent in demonstrating significant clinical benefits of acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care. The clinical implications are substantial, suggesting that acupuncture should be considered a valid therapeutic option for patients with migraine requiring prophylactic treatment, particularly those who refuse prophylactic medications or experience adverse effects. For tension-type headache, acupuncture emerges as an option for frequent episodes or chronic tension-type headache.
Strengths
- 1Comprehensive analysis of multiple high-quality Cochrane systematic reviews
- 2Large sample size with more than 7,000 participants included
- 3Individual patient data meta-analysis provides robust evidence against merely placebo effects
- 4Multiple follow-up periods evaluated (2 to 6+ months)
- 5Comparisons with multiple controls including established medications
Limitations
- 1Significant heterogeneity across studies in outcome definition and measurement
- 2Contribution of placebo effects to clinical efficacy not fully elucidated
- 3Limited cost-effectiveness data for contexts outside Europe
- 4Acupuncture protocol specifications not standardized across studies
- 5Limited long-term follow-up evidence (>6 months)
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Headache prophylaxis is one of the scenarios where acupuncture finds the most consolidated place in evidence-based medicine, and this review formalizes that with a sample of more than 7,000 participants. In pain service practice, the therapeutic gap is real: a relevant share of patients with high-frequency episodic migraine or chronic tension-type headache do not tolerate beta-blockers, valproate, or topiramate at effective doses, whether because of cognitive effects, weight gain, or fatigue. This review supports acupuncture as a first-line alternative in these cases, not as a last resort. The data on superiority over routine care at two months — and equivalence or advantage over metoprolol and flunarizine — authorize positioning it in the same conversation as established prophylactic drugs, especially for young patients of reproductive age, where drug restrictions are even more frequent.
▸ Notable Findings
The effect coefficient of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.22-0.55) from the Vickers et al. meta-analysis, derived from individual patient data, is the finding that weighs most in this review. It directly addresses the classic objection that acupuncture would be sophisticated placebo: the difference compared to sham, although of moderate magnitude, is statistically robust and methodologically difficult to refute. For tension-type headache, the superiority over sham and routine care sustained across multiple follow-up windows — 2, 3-4, and 5-6 months — indicates effect durability that goes beyond a short-term response. The lower dropout rate due to adverse effects compared to prophylactic medications also has direct clinical weight: adherence is decisive for prophylactic success, and a more favorable tolerability profile translates to real-world results outside the trial setting.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice, chronic tension-type headache and migraine with failure or intolerance to two or more prophylactics are the indications that most refer for acupuncture in our service. I usually observe perceptible reduction in attack frequency after the third or fourth session, with a more solid response consolidating between the sixth and eighth sessions — which is consistent with the eight-week protocols analyzed in this review. The protocol I have been using combines craniocervical points with classical distal points for headache, frequently combined with trigger-point dry needling in the trapezius and suboccipitals when there is an evident myofascial component, which is very common in tension-type. After the acute phase, biweekly maintenance for two to three months helps secure the gain. The profile that responds best is the patient with high attack frequency, associated cervical tension component, and contraindication or poor tolerance to pharmacotherapy. Patients with excessive analgesic use need detoxification first — isolated acupuncture in that context tends to disappoint.
Indexed scientific article
This study is indexed in an international scientific database. Check your institutional access to obtain the full article.
This study underpins the editorial content of the site.
Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.
Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories