Three Acupuncture Methods for Postoperative Pain in Mixed Hemorrhoids: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Ye et al. · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · 2022
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To compare the clinical efficacy of 3 acupuncture methods for postoperative pain in mixed hemorrhoids
WHO
5,121 patients with pain after mixed hemorrhoid surgery
DURATION
47 studies analyzed through October 2021
POINTS
Auricular therapy, point application, and catgut embedding
🔬 Study Design
Auricular therapy
n=1500
Application of seeds/adhesives on the auricle
Point application
n=1200
Application of medicinal herbs at specific points
Catgut embedding
n=1100
Catgut threads embedded at acupoints
Control
n=1321
Conventional analgesics or standard treatment
📊 Results in numbers
Improvement in total efficacy with point application
Pain reduction with auricular therapy vs. analgesics
Efficacy of catgut embedding vs. analgesics
Pain relief at 72 h postoperatively
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Total efficacy (SUCRA ranking)
This study shows that three types of acupuncture (application of natural remedies on the skin, ear seeds, and special threads) are more effective than traditional medications in relieving pain after hemorrhoid surgery. Application of natural remedies at specific skin points produced the best results.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Mixed hemorrhoids are one of the most common anorectal conditions, and although surgery is the most effective treatment for definitive removal, postoperative pain represents one of the main complications these patients face after the procedure. This pain arises from the rich innervation of the region below the dentate line, which makes the painful response highly sensitive, in addition to the release of inflammatory mediators after surgery and the constant stimulation of the surgical wound by activities such as defecation and dressing changes, resulting in persistent spasm of the anal sphincter muscle.
Traditionally, postoperative pain management in hemorrhoid surgery has been carried out primarily with analgesic medications. However, these medications require multiple doses over short periods, which can cause adverse effects on the gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. Patients frequently experience dizziness, nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, and skin itching, and the high cost of medications increases the economic burden. This has created an urgent clinical need for nonpharmacological approaches that can effectively relieve patients' pain and improve their quality of life while keeping the adverse effects of medications to a minimum.
This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of three different acupuncture methods in the treatment of postoperative pain after mixed hemorrhoid surgery: auricular application with seeds, application of medications at acupoints, and catgut thread embedding at acupoints. The researchers conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, searching for evidence in eight major medical databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM, from database inception through October 2021. The search was conducted by combining specific terms related to the three acupuncture methods and postoperative pain in mixed hemorrhoids.
After a rigorous literature screening process, 47 randomized controlled trials involving 5,121 patients were included. The analysis examined several important clinical outcomes: total efficacy rate, pain scores, pain grade, complications, and adverse reactions. The network meta-analysis allowed not only direct comparisons between treatments but also indirect comparisons across an evidence network, providing a hierarchical ranking of treatments based on their efficacy.
The results revealed significant findings on the relative efficacy of the three acupuncture methods. In terms of overall efficacy, both auricular application and catgut thread embedding at acupoints demonstrated significant superiority compared with conventional analgesics. When compared with conventional treatment, auricular application showed an odds ratio of 3.66, indicating considerably superior efficacy. Cumulative ranking analysis showed that application of medications at acupoints obtained the best overall ranking, with a 73.6% probability of being the most effective treatment, followed by auricular application at 68.7%, catgut thread embedding at 64.6%, and the combination of auricular application with point application at 63.4%.
Regarding pain score reduction, all three acupuncture methods demonstrated superior efficacy compared with both analgesics and conventional treatment. Particularly noteworthy was that the combination of auricular application with point application showed the greatest efficacy in pain reduction, with a 99.5% probability of being the best treatment. Point application alone maintained the second position with a 73.5% probability. The study also demonstrated that the analgesic effects of acupuncture methods were lasting and stable, maintaining superior efficacy at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the intervention, with the 72-hour efficacy being particularly pronounced.
For patients and healthcare providers, these results have important clinical implications. First, acupuncture methods offer safe and effective alternatives to traditional analgesics, with significantly fewer adverse effects. The study showed that catgut thread embedding at acupoints was the most effective in reducing adverse reactions, followed by the combination of auricular application with point application. Second, these methods can be easily integrated into standard postoperative care protocols, offering patients personalized treatment options based on their specific preferences and conditions.
Third, acupuncture techniques can reduce dependence on analgesic medications, potentially decreasing the risk of medication-related side effects and reducing healthcare costs.
The acupuncture methods studied offer several practical advantages over traditional acupuncture. They avoid the pain caused by multiple needle insertions, reduce the workload of medical staff, and compensate for the short duration of the curative effect of conventional acupuncture. More importantly, there is no need to change needles daily, which improves patient adherence and promotes clinical application at the primary care level. These methods are classified as complementary or alternative green therapy, aligning with the growing preference for more natural treatment approaches.
The study has some important limitations that should be considered. The methodological quality of the included studies was variable, with many failing to mention adequate methods of allocation concealment. Due to the specific nature of acupuncture therapy, most studies did not implement blinding, which may have produced implementation bias. In addition, the specific details of acupuncture protocols were not uniformly reported, including traditional Chinese medicine pattern identification, treatment frequency, and duration.
For combined therapies, fewer clinical studies were available, representing an area for future research. Future studies should follow more rigorous reporting standards, such as the CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines, to improve the quality of evidence.
In conclusion, current evidence suggests that acupuncture methods, particularly application of medications at acupoints, offer superior benefits in the treatment of postoperative pain after mixed hemorrhoid surgery compared with conventional analgesics and standard treatment. These methods demonstrate improved overall efficacy, significant reduction in pain scores, and relief of pain levels while maintaining favorable safety profiles. The lasting nature of the analgesic effects, particularly evident at 72 hours postoperatively, suggests that acupuncture treatments provide sustained pain relief. For healthcare providers, these findings support the integration of acupuncture methods into postoper
Strengths
- 1Large sample with more than 5,000 patients
- 2Direct comparison between three acupuncture methods
- 3Analysis of multiple outcomes including pain and complications
- 4Evidence of sustained efficacy up to 72 h postoperatively
- 5Lower incidence of adverse effects with acupuncture
Limitations
- 1Low methodological quality of included studies
- 2Lack of standardization in acupuncture protocols
- 3Absence of blinding in most studies
- 4Significant heterogeneity between studies
- 5Few studies on combined therapies
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Postoperative pain after hemorrhoid surgery is a real and underestimated clinical challenge. Unlike other minor surgeries, the anorectal postoperative period combines dense somatic innervation below the pectinate line, reflex sphincter spasm, and repeated nociceptive stimuli from defecation, making pain control particularly difficult with conventional analgesia alone. This network meta-analysis with 5,121 patients distributes evidence across three nonpharmacological modalities — auricular therapy, application of medications at acupoints, and catgut embedding — and demonstrates that all outperform conventional analgesics in overall efficacy. The finding that effects are sustained up to 72 hours is clinically useful, as that is precisely the interval when analgesic demand is greatest. For colorectal surgery and perioperative medicine services, these data support incorporating these techniques as components of multimodal analgesia, particularly in patients with contraindications to NSAIDs or opioids, older adults at increased risk of CNS adverse effects, or patients with gastropathy.
▸ Notable Findings
The most striking result of this analysis is the performance of the combination of auricular therapy plus point application in reducing pain scores, with a 99.5% probability of being the most effective treatment for that specific outcome — a rare cumulative ranking index in pain meta-analyses. Looking at overall efficacy, point application leads with a 73.6% probability of best ranking, followed by auricular therapy with an odds ratio of 5.90 versus analgesics, representing a considerable effect size. Catgut embedding stands out for its safety profile, with the lowest incidence of adverse reactions among the modalities evaluated. The temporal curve — with demonstrable efficacy at 24, 48, and 72 hours — indicates that this is not transient immediate relief, but sustained analgesic modulation, consistent with segmental and suprasegmental neuromodulation mechanisms already described in the literature.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in perioperative pain and rehabilitation, I have been increasingly called by colorectal surgery teams for analgesic support after hemorrhoidectomy, especially in cases where opioid escalation produces prolonged ileus or urinary retention — complications that further worsen the picture. I usually start auricular therapy in the recovery room itself, applying seeds at the Shen Men, rectum, and sympathetic nervous system points, and I have observed consistent subjective pain reduction within the first 12 hours. For outpatients, application at perineal and sacral acupoints is part of our protocol within the first 48 hours, and the response tends to be proportional to prior sphincter tension — patients with elevated tone respond better. I reserve catgut embedding for cases of refractory pain with a more prolonged local hyperalgesia component. The data from this work confirm what I see routinely: combining methods outperforms any single modality. I do not recommend these techniques as a substitute for pharmacological analgesia, but as partners within a rational multimodal protocol.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · 2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5627550
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories