Effectiveness of acupuncture and myofascial release in analgesia of women with tensional neck pain: Systematic review
Araújo et al. · International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science · 2019
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To review the analgesic effect of acupuncture and myofascial release in the treatment of tension-type neck pain in women
WHO
Patients with tension-type cervical pain, with female predominance
DURATION
Analysis of studies published between 2005-2019
POINTS
Cervical paraspinal points, trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture Studies
n=15
Manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture
Myofascial Release Studies
n=15
Manual and instrument-assisted myofascial release techniques
📊 Results in numbers
Improvement rate with acupuncture
Cervical pain in acupuncture treatments
Immediate relief with acupuncture vs medications
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Efficacy in pain relief
This study showed that both acupuncture and myofascial release (deep muscle massage) are effective for relieving neck pain. Acupuncture showed faster results, with 90% of patients showing improvement, while myofascial release also demonstrated significant benefits, especially when combined with other treatments.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of acupuncture and myofascial release in the treatment of tension-type cervical pain, a condition affecting 30-50% of the general population, with a female predominance. Tension-type cervical pain is characterized by the presence of pain in the posterior or posterolateral region of the neck, frequently associated with emotional factors, stress, and postural alterations. The authors performed a comprehensive search across databases including Medline, BVS, Lilacs, SciELO, and Google Scholar, analyzing publications from 2005 to 2019. Thirty studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected, with approximately half on acupuncture and half on myofascial release.
The acupuncture results demonstrated remarkable efficacy, with studies showing improvement in approximately 90% of treated cases. The research by Kim et al. identified that cervical pain represents 23.9% of all conditions treated with acupuncture in a Korean university hospital, being the second most common cause after low back pain. The Nakajima study showed favorable results in nearly 90% of 15 patients treated with weekly acupuncture for 4 weeks.
Comparatively, the Figueroa study demonstrated superiority of acupuncture over pharmacological treatment, with 48% of patients in the acupuncture group showing immediate pain relief, compared to 0% in the medication group. Electroacupuncture was particularly effective, providing rapid symptom relief and improving function in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Regarding myofascial release, the reviewed studies indicated significant effectiveness in pain reduction and functional improvement. The technique is based on the application of low-load, long-duration pressure to promote muscle relaxation and pain reduction.
Rodriguez et al. compared myofascial release with a multimodal physical therapy program and found superiority of the former in short-term pain relief. The authors observed that the efficacy of myofascial release is enhanced when combined with other therapeutic modalities. Both techniques demonstrated the ability to significantly improve quality of life and cervical range of motion.
Acupuncture showed advantages in response time, providing faster pain relief, while myofascial release demonstrated lasting benefits, especially in combined programs. From a pathophysiological standpoint, tension-type cervical pain is closely related to myofascial trigger points, particularly in the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. The associated postural alterations create a vicious cycle of muscle shortening, tension, and pain. Both acupuncture and myofascial release act by interrupting this cycle through distinct but complementary mechanisms.
Identified limitations include the methodological heterogeneity of the reviewed studies and the absence of research directly comparing the two modalities. The authors emphasize the need for more controlled studies to establish standardized protocols and determine which technique is most effective for different subtypes of cervical pain.
Strengths
- 1Comprehensive review across multiple databases
- 2Analysis of both therapeutic modalities
- 3Extensive search period (14 years)
- 4Consistent results across different studies
Limitations
- 1Methodological heterogeneity of included studies
- 2Absence of direct comparison between acupuncture and myofascial release
- 3Lack of detail on methodological quality criteria
- 4Small sample sizes in some studies
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Tension-type cervical pain ranks among the most prevalent complaints in musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation clinics, affecting between 30 and 50% of the general population with a clear female predominance. This review, by consolidating 30 studies covering acupuncture and myofascial release across 14 years of scientific production, offers the clinician a comparative perspective on two techniques that frequently make up the therapeutic armamentarium of pain services. The data showing that 48% of patients undergoing acupuncture obtained immediate pain relief compared to 0% in the medication group is directly applicable to the scenario of a patient with acute tension-type cervicalgia who seeks rapid response and does not tolerate or refuses pharmacotherapy. The population that concentrates the greatest benefit potential includes women of working age with postural overload and a chronic stress component, a profile that responds well to the combination of the two reviewed modalities.
▸ Notable Findings
The most robust finding is the improvement rate of approximately 90% in the acupuncture studies, a figure that remained consistent across the analyzed works, including the Nakajima protocol with weekly sessions for four weeks. Electroacupuncture stood out within the intervention subgroup, with a particularly expressive response in patients with a cervical radicular component, suggesting pain modulation mechanisms that transcend the purely local effect on the trigger point. In the field of myofascial release, the data showing that Rodriguez et al. demonstrated short-term superiority over the conventional multimodal physical therapy program contradicts the intuition that multimodality always surpasses isolated techniques. The identification that cervical pain represents 23.9% of all conditions treated with acupuncture at a Korean university hospital quantifies the epidemiological weight of this indication within medical acupuncture practice.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, tension-type cervicalgia in women with predominantly seated work is probably the diagnosis for which I most frequently indicate acupuncture as a first-line adjunct. I usually see clinically perceptible response from the second or third session, especially when treatment is targeted at active trigger points in the upper trapezius and levator scapulae — a finding that aligns well with what this review describes about the mechanisms involving these muscles. My usual protocol involves eight to ten sessions for induction, followed by monthly maintenance as needed. I routinely combine acupuncture with eccentric cervical exercise and ergonomic counseling; in cases with a more pronounced myofascial component, I associate manual release in the same session or on alternate days with the physiatrist. Patients with a predominantly anxious profile or with a history of analgesic abuse are those who benefit most from the early transition to acupuncture. The profile that responds least is that of the patient with a significant compressive structural radicular component — in these cases, electroacupuncture still has a role, but expectations need to be calibrated.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science · 2019
DOI: 10.22161/ijaers.612.54
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories