Efficacy of abdominal acupuncture for neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

Ho et al. · PLOS ONE · 2017

🔬Double-Blind Controlled RCT👥n=154 participants🌟High Methodological Quality

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
5/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
3/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of abdominal acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture for neck pain

👥

WHO

154 adults (18-65 years) with neck pain in Hong Kong

⏱️

DURATION

6 sessions over 2 weeks with follow-up to 14 weeks

📍

POINTS

Zhongwan (CV-12), Guanyuan (CV-4), Shangqu (KI-17) bilateral, Huaroumen (ST-24) bilateral

🔬 Study Design

154participants
randomization

Abdominal Acupuncture

n=77

True needling at specific abdominal points

Sham Abdominal

n=77

Blunt non-penetrating needles at non-acupuncture points

⏱️ Duration: 2 weeks of treatment, follow-up to 14 weeks

📊 Results in numbers

-5.75 points

NPQ improvement at 2 weeks

-8.65 points

NPQ improvement at 6 weeks

-1.79 points

Pain reduction at 2 weeks

-1.80 points

Pain reduction at 6 weeks

📊 Outcome Comparison

NPQ Questionnaire improvement (%)

Abdominal Acupuncture
29
Sham
8

Pain Reduction (0-10 scale)

Abdominal Acupuncture
2.6
Sham
0.8
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that abdominal acupuncture is more effective than placebo treatment for reducing neck pain and improving function. Patients who received true abdominal acupuncture had significant improvements that were maintained for at least 14 weeks.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This rigorous randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of abdominal acupuncture, a specialized technique based on meridian theory, for the treatment of neck pain. The research was conducted in Hong Kong between November 2014 and March 2016, enrolling 154 adult participants with chronic cervical pain. Abdominal acupuncture is a therapeutic microsystem developed by Dr. Zhiyun Bo that uses specific points on the abdomen to treat various conditions, especially pain and neurological disorders.

The study employed a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, considered the gold standard for clinical research. Participants were randomized to receive either true abdominal acupuncture or sham treatment with blunt non-penetrating needles. Both groups received six treatment sessions over two weeks, with follow-up assessments through 14 weeks. The standardized protocol included five specific abdominal points: Zhongwan, Guanyuan, and bilateral Shangqu and Huaroumen points.

The primary outcome was assessed using the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ), a validated tool that measures functional disability related to cervical pain. Results demonstrated clear superiority of abdominal acupuncture over placebo. In the active treatment group, there was a mean reduction of 11.65 points in the NPQ score at two weeks and 11.90 points at six weeks, compared to reductions of only 5.90 and 3.25 points in the placebo group, respectively. These differences were statistically significant and clinically relevant, representing functional improvements greater than 25% relative to baseline values.

As for pain intensity, measured by the Visual Analog Scale, the abdominal acupuncture group showed mean reductions of 2.58 points at two weeks and 2.36 points at six weeks, while the placebo group showed reductions of only 0.79 and 0.56 points. Notably, pain improvements were observed as early as after the first treatment session. Health-related quality of life, assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire, also showed significant improvements in the active treatment group across several dimensions, including physical function, bodily pain, and general health. Long-term follow-up of the active treatment group showed that benefits were maintained and even intensified at 14 weeks.

The study demonstrated excellent adherence with no losses to follow-up, and blinding was effective in both groups. Safety was satisfactory, with only 11 cases of transient hematomas at the puncture site in the active treatment group, with no serious adverse events. Clinical implications are significant. Abdominal acupuncture offers a valid therapeutic alternative for patients with cervical pain, particularly important given the limitations of conventional treatments.

The technique proved safe, well tolerated, and capable of producing lasting improvements in both pain and function. However, the study has some important limitations. It was conducted at a single center with a predominantly Chinese female population, limiting generalizability of results. The protocol used fixed points rather than individualization based on traditional Chinese medicine syndromes.

In addition, only six sessions were administered, while typical clinical protocols involve more treatments.

Strengths

  • 1Rigorous double-blind design with effective placebo control
  • 2Adequate sample with no losses to follow-up
  • 3Use of validated assessment instruments
  • 4Long-term follow-up to 14 weeks
  • 5Clinically meaningful and statistically robust results
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Single-center study limiting generalizability
  • 2Predominantly female population
  • 3Fixed protocol without individualization by syndromes
  • 4Limited number of sessions compared to clinical practice
  • 5Need for replication in other populations
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Chronic cervical pain is one of the most prevalent conditions in any pain and rehabilitation service, and frequently challenges the conventional armamentarium — analgesics, physical therapy, and blocks have partial responses that are not always sustained. This trial by Ho et al. provides level 1 evidence for abdominal acupuncture as a structured therapeutic option in this scenario. The reductions observed in the NPQ score of -8.65 points at six weeks, with benefit that intensifies through 14 weeks, have direct functional translation: less limitation in activities of daily living, return to work, and reduced analgesic consumption. The most evident patient profile for this application is the adult with chronic cervicalgia who does not tolerate direct cervical needling due to regional hypersensitivity, or who has shown unsatisfactory response to conventional acupuncture protocols. The documented safety and absence of serious adverse events broaden the feasibility of integrating this technique into outpatient routines for musculoskeletal pain.

Notable Findings

The most clinically expressive finding of the study is not the magnitude of pain reduction itself, but the response kinetics: improvement was observed as early as after the first session on the Visual Analog Scale, with effects deepening progressively through week 14 — weeks after the end of the six treatment sessions. This pattern of delayed and sustained response is distinct from what is observed with blocks or with most analgesics, and suggests a mechanism of prolonged central modulation, not just an immediate peripheral effect. Superiority over sham was robust both for pain and for functionality and quality of life on the SF-36, especially in the bodily pain and physical function dimensions. The fact that a fixed protocol of only five abdominal points generated this response in a regional musculoskeletal condition reinforces the plausibility of the somatic microsystem concept with broad somato-visceral projection.

From My Experience

In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, I have incorporated abdominal acupuncture as second-line treatment for chronic cervicalgia, especially when local needling is limited by intense cervical allodynia or when the patient reports discomfort with needles in the paravertebral musculature. The experience I have accumulated is consistent with the temporal pattern of this study: I usually observe perceptible pain reduction between the second and third sessions, with functional gain consolidating between the sixth and eighth. For maintenance, I usually space sessions to every two weeks and then monthly, totaling around ten to twelve sessions in the first cycle. I almost systematically combine this with a supervised cervical stabilization program — analgesic gain facilitates exercise adherence, which in turn sustains the result. The profile that responds best, in my observation, is the patient with predominantly tension-related component and without overt radiculopathy. When there is documented radicular compression, isolated abdominal needling is usually insufficient and needs to be part of a broader protocol.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

PLOS ONE · 2017

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181360

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.