Skip to content

Efficacy of acupuncture on acute pharynx infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhang et al. · Medicine · 2023

📊Systematic Review + Meta-analysis👥n=1,701 patientsHigh clinical impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
78/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of acute pharyngeal infections

👥

WHO

Patients with acute pharyngitis, including adults and children

⏱️

DURATION

Treatments of 1 to 7 days

📍

POINTS

He Gu (LI-4), Qu Chi (LI-11), Shao Shang (LU-11), auricular points, and local bloodletting

🔬 Study Design

1701participants
randomization

Acupuncture

n=851

Manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, bloodletting, or auriculotherapy

Control

n=850

Antibiotics or sham acupuncture

⏱️ Duration: Search through October 2022

📊 Results in numbers

OR 4.18

Clinical response rate (acupuncture vs antibiotics)

g=1.30

Pain reduction (visual analog scale)

g=-3.25

Reduction in sore throat duration

g=0.42

Leukocyte reduction

0%

Adverse events with acupuncture

Percentage highlights

0%
Adverse events with acupuncture

📊 Outcome Comparison

Clinical response rate

Acupuncture
85
Antibiotics
65

Safety (no adverse events)

Acupuncture
100
Antibiotics
75
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that acupuncture is more effective than antibiotics for treating acute sore throat, relieving symptoms more quickly and with fewer side effects. Acupuncture proved to be a safe and effective alternative for pharyngeal infections.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This study represents the first comprehensive meta-analysis on acupuncture for acute pharyngeal infections, analyzing 19 randomized controlled trials with 1,701 patients. Acute pharyngeal infections are extremely common, affecting more than 2% of adults and 5% of children each year, causing significant impact on public health and productivity. Conventional treatment is based primarily on antibiotics, which can cause adverse effects and contribute to bacterial resistance. The methodology was rigorous, following PRISMA guidelines and including searches across multiple databases through October 2022.

Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture (manual, electroacupuncture, bloodletting, or auriculotherapy) with antibiotics or sham acupuncture in patients with acute pharyngitis. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane tools, with only one study showing high risk of bias. Primary results demonstrated significant superiority of acupuncture over antibiotics in the clinical response rate (OR=4.18), indicating that patients treated with acupuncture had more than four times the likelihood of improvement. Secondary outcomes showed that acupuncture significantly reduced visual analog scale pain scores (g=1.30), decreased sore throat duration (g=-3.25), and improved inflammatory markers, including leukocyte count (g=0.42).

Notably, no adverse events were reported in the acupuncture groups, whereas antibiotics caused nausea, vomiting, skin rash, and allergic reactions. Subgroup analysis revealed that auriculotherapy and bloodletting were more effective than manual acupuncture for pain relief. The most used points were He Gu (LI-4), Qu Chi (LI-11), and Shao Shang (LU-11), belonging to the Large Intestine and Lung meridians, traditionally associated with the treatment of respiratory conditions. The proposed mechanism involves modulation of the neuro-immune system, with acupuncture regulating M1/M2 macrophages, NK cell activity, mast cell degranulation, and release of anti-inflammatory mediators.

Acupuncture also appears to inhibit pro-inflammatory neuropeptides such as substance P and CGRP. The clinical implications are significant, suggesting that acupuncture can be considered a first-line treatment for acute pharyngitis, especially given its superior safety profile. This is particularly relevant in the current context of antimicrobial resistance and the need for alternatives to antibiotics. Limitations include clinical heterogeneity in acupuncture protocols, small sample sizes in some studies, and the difficulty of blinding due to the nature of the intervention.

Only two studies used sham acupuncture as a control, limiting the assessment of placebo effect. Methodologic quality varied, with many studies not adequately describing randomization and allocation concealment.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive meta-analysis with a robust sample of 1,701 patients
  • 2Rigorous methodology following PRISMA guidelines
  • 3Safety assessment showing a superior profile for acupuncture
  • 4Subgroup analysis identifying the most effective techniques
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Clinical heterogeneity in acupuncture protocols
  • 2Few studies with sham acupuncture limiting placebo assessment
  • 3Variable methodologic quality across studies
  • 4Restriction to publications in English and Chinese
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Acute pharyngitis is among the most frequently seen conditions in primary care, and pressure to prescribe antibiotics remains a real challenge for any clinician concerned with antimicrobial resistance. This meta-analysis, pooling 1,701 patients across 19 randomized controlled trials, gives the clinician a quantitative basis to discuss acupuncture as a concrete alternative in the management of uncomplicated acute pharyngitis. The clinical response rate favoring acupuncture over antibiotics — expressed by an OR of 4.18 — positions the technique not as a peripheral adjunct but as an intervention with substantive effect. The safety profile, with zero adverse events reported in the acupuncture group versus nausea, rash, and allergic reactions in the antibiotic group, reinforces clinical relevance especially in patients with a history of hypersensitivity to antimicrobials, in pregnant patients, and in children, where the risk-benefit ratio of antibiotics is routinely questioned.

Notable Findings

Two findings stand out beyond global efficacy. First, the effect on sore throat duration (g = −3.25) is of large magnitude and clinically tangible — reducing the time of painful symptomatology has a direct impact on productivity and quality of life, an outcome often overlooked in pharyngitis studies that prioritize bacteriologic cure. Second, the modulation of objective inflammatory markers, such as the leukocyte count (g = 0.42), suggests that the effect transcends symptomatic analgesia and involves systemic neuroinflammatory modulation — consistent with what we know about the neuro-immune axis and the regulation of M1/M2 macrophages, inhibition of substance P and CGRP. The subgroup analysis pointing to auriculotherapy and bloodletting as superior to manual acupuncture for pain relief is a relevant operational distinction for those choosing the technique in the office.

From My Experience

In my practice, I do not typically treat acute pharyngitis in isolation in a rehabilitation service, but this scenario frequently presents as a comorbidity in chronic patients — the patient with neck pain or temporomandibular dysfunction who has a recurrent episode of pharyngitis and asks whether acupuncture can help. From this meta-analysis and my reading of the prior literature, I have become more affirmative in that answer. I have observed symptomatic response within the first 24 to 48 hours after a session with needling at He Gu and Qu Chi, with noticeable pain relief even before any antibiotic is started. In patients with a history of allergy to penicillins or beta-lactams, this alternative becomes especially valuable. The patient profile that responds best, in my experience, is one without signs of peritonsillar abscess, without systemic toxicity, and with a predominantly painful presentation — precisely the profile where the clinician hesitates before prescribing an antibiotic.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Medicine · 2023

DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034124

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.