Skip to content

Acupuncture Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Six Months Follow-Up

Zhang et al. · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · 2011

⚗️Controlled RCT👥n=53 participants📊Moderate Evidence

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
3/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To test whether the PC-7 point is more effective than LI-4 for treating heel pain caused by plantar fasciitis

👥

WHO

53 adults with heel pain lasting more than 3 months

⏱️

DURATION

10 sessions over 2 weeks, with a 6-month follow-up

📍

POINTS

PC-7 (Daling, 大陵) in the treatment group vs. LI-4 (Hegu, 合谷) in the control group

🔬 Study Design

53participants
randomization

PC-7 Group

n=28

Needling at the PC-7 point (Daling, 大陵)

LI-4 Group

n=25

Needling at the LI-4 point (Hegu, 合谷)

⏱️ Duration: 2 weeks of treatment with 6 months of follow-up

📊 Results in numbers

22.6 vs. 12.0 points

Morning pain reduction (PC-7 vs. LI-4)

20.3 vs. 9.5 points

Overall pain reduction (PC-7 vs. LI-4)

145.5 vs. -15.5 kPa

Pain threshold improvement (PC-7 vs. LI-4)

0

Serious adverse events

📊 Outcome Comparison

Morning pain reduction (1 month)

PC-7
22.6
LI-4
12

Overall pain reduction (1 month)

PC-7
20.3
LI-4
9.5
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that using acupuncture at the PC-7 point (located on the wrist) was more effective for treating heel pain than using the LI-4 point (located on the hand). The treatment was safe, and patients began to feel improvement after one week of therapy.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Plantar fasciitis is one of the leading causes of heel pain, affecting approximately 10% of the general population. The condition is characterized by pain and tenderness in the medial region of the calcaneus, especially when bearing weight and particularly in the morning shortly after waking. Conventional treatments include anti-inflammatory medications and corticosteroid injections; however, these can be associated with significant side effects, making it necessary to explore safe and effective alternative therapies.

Acupuncture has traditionally been used for various musculoskeletal pain conditions, including heel pain. According to traditional Chinese medicine, certain specific acupuncture points are thought to have targeted effects for particular conditions. In the case of heel pain, the Daling point (PC-7), located on the wrist, is considered specific for this type of pain. This study aimed to investigate whether this point truly has a specific action superior to other points with general analgesic properties.

The researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial with 53 adult participants who had suffered from plantar fasciitis for at least three months. Patients were divided into two groups: the treatment group received acupuncture at the PC-7 point (located on the wrist), while the control group received acupuncture at the Hegu point (LI-4), also located on the hand and known for its general analgesic properties. Treatment consisted of ten daily acupuncture sessions over two weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes. Both the participants and the researcher responsible for the assessments were blinded as to which treatment was being applied, ensuring impartiality of results.

To evaluate the efficacy of the treatments, the researchers used pain scales measuring symptom intensity in the morning, during activity, and overall. Algometry, a technique that measures pressure pain threshold using a specific device, was also used. Assessments were performed before, during, and after treatment, with a six-month follow-up.

The results demonstrated statistically significant differences between the groups, favoring treatment with PC-7. One month after the end of treatment, the group receiving acupuncture at PC-7 showed greater reduction in morning pain, overall pain, and improvement in pressure pain threshold compared with the control group. In the PC-7 group, the improvement in morning pain was approximately 23 points on a 100-point scale, while in the control group it was only 12 points. Similar results were observed for overall pain and during activities.

Interestingly, the researchers also observed that treatment was more effective in patients with a shorter symptom duration.

From a clinical standpoint, these findings suggest that acupuncture may be a valid therapeutic alternative for patients with plantar fasciitis, offering pain relief with safety. The study recorded no serious adverse events in either group, only mild reactions such as small hematomas or local edema at the needling site. For patients, this means there is a non-pharmacological treatment option that can provide significant symptom relief, especially when started early in the course of the disease. For healthcare professionals, the results offer scientific evidence that specific acupuncture points may have targeted actions and not merely a general analgesic effect.

The study has several important limitations that should be considered. First, it did not include a control group receiving no acupuncture at all, which would have allowed assessment of whether the observed effect was due specifically to treatment or to factors such as spontaneous improvement of the condition. Second, although the differences between groups were statistically significant, they did not reach the 33% improvement threshold established at the outset as clinically relevant. Third, the sample size was relatively small, and many of the significant differences were concentrated in the one-month post-treatment period, diminishing in subsequent months.

Despite these limitations, the results are encouraging and suggest that the PC-7 point has specific characteristics for the treatment of heel pain, differing from a point with general analgesic properties. The researchers propose that the mechanism of action may be related to specific anti-inflammatory effects rather than general analgesia alone. For patients suffering from plantar fasciitis, especially those seeking alternatives to conventional medications, acupuncture at the PC-7 point represents a promising option that deserves consideration, always under the guidance of qualified professionals.

Strengths

  • 1First study to test single-point specificity for plantar fasciitis
  • 2Adequate control comparing two points of similar intensity
  • 3Prolonged 6-month follow-up
  • 4Objective assessment with algometry
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Small sample size for detecting clinically significant differences
  • 2Lack of a true placebo group (no needling)
  • 3Losses during long-term follow-up
  • 4Differences did not reach the predefined 33% threshold for clinical significance
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Plantar fasciitis is one of the most frequent diagnoses in the physiatry and sports medicine clinic, and the search for low-risk non-pharmacological interventions is constant, especially in patients with contraindications to anti-inflammatories or intolerance to injectable corticosteroids. This trial makes a direct contribution to clinical practice by comparing two acupuncture points — PC-7 and LI-4 — in a design that tests point specificity, not merely the effect of the needle. The PC-7 group demonstrated superiority across the three main metrics at one month: morning pain, overall pain, and pressure pain threshold by algometry. This guides point selection in real-world clinical protocols. Patients with more recent-onset plantar fasciitis appear to constitute the subgroup of greatest benefit, an argument that reinforces early indication and reduces the tendency to reserve acupuncture as a last-resort option.

Notable Findings

The most striking finding of the study is the difference in pressure pain threshold measured by algometry: PC-7 produced a gain of 145.5 kPa against a variation of -15.5 kPa in the LI-4 group — a divergence of magnitude that goes beyond statistical significance and suggests a distinct neuromodulatory effect between the points. The use of algometry as an objective outcome, rather than relying exclusively on subjective scales, strengthens the robustness of the data. Another relevant finding is that modulation at LI-4, a point classically cited as a broad-spectrum analgesic in traditional Chinese medicine, was substantially inferior to that of PC-7, challenging the assumption that any point with general analgesic action would respond equivalently to a specific anatomical condition. The absence of serious adverse events in both groups, with a protocol of ten daily sessions, reinforces the safety profile of needling at these distal locations.

From My Experience

In my practice in the pain and rehabilitation service, plantar fasciitis frequently arrives already with a history of corticosteroid injection and prolonged use of anti-inflammatories. I tend to introduce acupuncture as a component of the program from the first weeks, combining it with an arch-support insole, eccentric stretching of the fascia and gastrocnemius, and — when indicated — shockwave therapy. For needling, I have preferred protocols that combine local periradicular points around the calcaneus with distal points, and the behavior this article describes for PC-7 is consistent with responses I observe: perceptible improvement in morning pain from the second week onward. Patients with less than six months of symptoms respond more quickly and require fewer sessions for maintenance — generally eight to twelve sessions in the initial cycle. I am cautious about indicating acupuncture in isolation in cases with a significant structural biomechanical component, such as severe pes planus or marked shortening of the Achilles tendon, where needling without concurrent mechanical correction tends to produce partial gain and early relapse.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · 2011

DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep186

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.