Efficacy of Auricular Acupressure in Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chen et al. · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · 2021

📊Systematic Review and Meta-analysis👥n=1,449 participantsHigh clinical impact

Evidence Level

STRONG
82/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of auriculotherapy in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

👥

WHO

1,449 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

⏱️

DURATION

Analysis of studies between 2011-2020

📍

POINTS

Stomach (100%), Shenmen (94.7%), Sympathetic (73.7%), Spleen (63.2%)

🔬 Study Design

1449participants
randomization

Auriculotherapy + Antiemetics

n=839

Auricular pressure with seeds + standard medication

Antiemetics Only

n=610

Conventional antiemetic medication

⏱️ Duration: Analysis of 19 randomized clinical trials

📊 Results in numbers

31% better

Overall efficacy for delayed nausea and vomiting

0%

Reduction of delayed nausea

0%

Reduction of delayed vomiting

0%

Reduction of medication side effects

Percentage highlights

31% better
Overall efficacy for delayed nausea and vomiting
32%
Reduction of delayed nausea
9%
Reduction of delayed vomiting
38%
Reduction of medication side effects

📊 Outcome Comparison

Overall efficacy for nausea and vomiting

Auriculotherapy + Antiemetics
131
Antiemetics Only
100
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study demonstrated that auriculotherapy (pressure on specific points of the ear), when combined with anti-nausea medications, is more effective than medications alone in preventing delayed nausea from chemotherapy. The treatment is safe and also reduces side effects of conventional drugs.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Nausea and vomiting are among the most debilitating side effects faced by cancer patients during chemotherapy, affecting more than 40% of patients even with the use of modern antiemetic medications. These symptoms not only significantly impair patients' quality of life, but can also interfere with treatment adherence, leading some patients to delay or discontinue chemotherapy. Delayed vomiting, which occurs 2 to 5 days after chemotherapy, is particularly challenging to treat due to the rapid onset and short half-life of conventional antiemetic medications. In addition, many of these medications cause side effects such as constipation, fatigue, dizziness, and diarrhea, limiting their repeated use.

In the face of these challenges, auricular acupressure emerges as a promising and noninvasive alternative based on Traditional Chinese Medicine. This technique uses small seeds or magnetic spheres applied to specific points in the ear, providing continuous stimulation without causing pain or discomfort. The researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to scientifically evaluate the efficacy of auricular acupressure in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The study followed rigorous methodology, searching eight international and Chinese scientific databases from their inception through April 2020.

The inclusion criteria covered only randomized controlled trials that compared auricular acupressure alone or combined with antiemetic medications versus standard treatment or placebo in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

The analysis included 19 randomized controlled trials involving 1,449 patients with various types of cancer, published between 2011 and 2020. The studies used 19 different auricular points, the most frequent being: Stomach (used in 100% of the studies), Shenmen (94.7%), Sympathetic (73.7%), Spleen (63.2%), Subcortex (52.6%), and Liver (31.6%). Most studies compared auricular acupressure combined with antiemetic medications versus antiemetics alone. The researchers separately evaluated efficacy for nausea and vomiting, also taking into account the timing of symptoms (acute — first 24 hours, and delayed — days 2 to 5 after chemotherapy).

The results demonstrated significant benefits of auricular acupressure, particularly when combined with antiemetic medications. Overall efficiency in relieving nausea and vomiting was 31% greater in the group that received auricular acupressure combined with antiemetics compared with the control group. For delayed symptoms specifically, the results were even more promising: the frequency of delayed nausea was reduced by 32% and the frequency of delayed vomiting by 68%. Interestingly, the technique was less effective for acute symptoms, suggesting that its action is more sustained and complementary to fast-acting medications.

In addition to the direct benefits on nausea and vomiting, auricular acupressure significantly reduced side effects of antiemetic medications, including constipation (39% reduction), diarrhea (34% reduction), and fatigue (61% reduction).

For patients and their families, these results offer hope of better control over the most feared symptoms of chemotherapy. Auricular acupressure represents a safe, noninvasive, and low-cost option that can easily be integrated into conventional treatment. Health care professionals can consider this technique as a complementary therapy, especially for patients who experience persistent or delayed nausea and vomiting, or those who suffer significant side effects from antiemetic medications. The technique involves the placement of small seeds or spheres at specific points on the ear, which remain in place for several days, providing continuous stimulation.

The mechanism of action is based on the stimulation of neural pathways that modulate the brain centers responsible for nausea and vomiting.

Despite the encouraging results, the study has important limitations that should be considered. The clinical heterogeneity among the included studies, with different cancer types, chemotherapy regimens, and acupressure protocols, reduces confidence in the results. There is no standardization in the selection of auricular points, duration of pressure, frequency of seed replacement, or qualification of the providers, which makes it difficult to reproduce the results in clinical practice. Most studies had small samples, and only one study included children, limiting the generalizability of the findings.

In addition, due to the characteristics of the intervention, it was difficult to implement adequate blinding in the studies, which may have influenced the results.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides robust scientific evidence that auricular acupressure, especially when combined with antiemetic medications, offers significant benefits in controlling chemotherapy-induced delayed nausea and vomiting, in addition to reducing side effects of conventional medications. The authors recommend the technique as a complementary therapy in the management of these symptoms, particularly for patients with persistent symptoms. However, future studies with larger samples, standardized protocols, and more rigorous methodological designs are needed to definitively confirm the efficacy of auricular acupressure alone and to establish clear guidelines for its clinical implementation.

Strengths

  • 1Large sample of 1,449 patients
  • 2Rigorous analysis of 19 clinical trials
  • 3Robust evidence for delayed nausea and vomiting
  • 4Significant reduction in side effects
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Heterogeneity among included studies
  • 2Lack of standardization in technique application
  • 3Few studies in children
  • 4Variation in chemotherapy regimens
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting continues to be one of the great challenges of supportive oncology, even with the advent of 5-HT3 and NK1 receptor antagonists. The delayed phase — from the second to the fifth day after infusion — remains particularly refractory to the conventional antiemetic arsenal, precisely because of the unfavorable pharmacokinetics of these molecules. This meta-analysis, gathering 1,449 patients distributed across 19 randomized trials, provides a solid basis for incorporating auricular acupressure as an adjuvant strategy in this specific scenario. The 31% reduction in overall efficiency for nausea and vomiting and the 32% drop in delayed nausea are clinically meaningful. Equally relevant is the 38% reduction in adverse effects of conventional antiemetics, since constipation, fatigue, and dizziness directly compromise adherence to the chemotherapy protocol and the quality of life of the cancer patient.

Notable Findings

The most noteworthy aspect of this analysis is the temporal asymmetry of the effect: auricular acupressure showed robust benefit for delayed symptoms but modest performance against acute symptoms in the first 24 hours. This reveals a mechanism of action that does not compete with rapid-onset antiemetics, but complements them precisely where they fail. The 68% reduction in delayed vomiting — although it should be contextualized by the lower baseline frequency of this outcome — is striking. Among the auricular points used, the Stomach point appeared in 100% of the studies, while Shenmen, Sympathetic, and Spleen were predominant combinations, suggesting an empirical convergence that deserves systematization. The 61% reduction in fatigue associated with antiemetics opens up an additional therapeutic vector, since this symptom is frequently attributed to the disease itself or to chemotherapy, rather than to the antiemetic.

From My Experience

In my practice at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, we have been working for years with auriculotherapy in cancer patients who come to the clinic with chronic pain, and the spontaneous report of improvement in nausea is not uncommon in these cases. The empirical perception I have accumulated over this trajectory converges with what this meta-analysis demonstrates: the technique requires at least two to three chemotherapy cycles for the patient and the physician to perceive consistent gain in the delayed phase. I usually replace the auricular seeds every three to five days, maintaining continuous stimulation of the Stomach, Shenmen, and Sympathetic points — a configuration that empirically yields a better antiemetic response. I routinely combine it with instructions for the patient to perform manual pressure at home, two to three times a day, which extends the effect and favors therapeutic autonomy. Patients with a history of anticipatory emesis and high anxiety respond particularly well, since Shenmen exerts a modulating action on the autonomic component. In this profile, auricular acupressure is incorporated into my protocol as the first-line adjuvant, even before considering antiemetic escalation.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · 2021

DOI: 10.1155/2021/8868720

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.