Acupuncture for fibromyalgia syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Choi et al. · Frontiers in Medicine · 2025
OBJECTIVE
Evaluate the methodological quality and strength of evidence of systematic reviews on the efficacy of acupuncture for fibromyalgia
WHO
Patients with fibromyalgia syndrome diagnosed by American College of Rheumatology criteria
PERIOD
Search through May 2025, including studies from 2007 to 2022
INTERVENTION
Traditional acupuncture and electroacupuncture compared with sham acupuncture and pharmacologic treatments
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture
n=540
Traditional acupuncture or electroacupuncture
Controls
n=541
Sham acupuncture or standard medications
📊 Results in numbers
Pain reduction vs sham acupuncture
Pain reduction vs medications
Improvement on Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Reduction in tender points
High-quality reviews
📊 Outcome Comparison
Methodological quality (AMSTAR-2)
This study analyzed 13 scientific reviews on acupuncture for fibromyalgia. Although acupuncture has shown benefits in reducing pain and improving quality of life, the quality of the studies is low. More rigorous research is needed to definitively confirm the efficacy of acupuncture in fibromyalgia.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Fibromyalgia is a complex medical condition that primarily affects women, characterized by chronic widespread pain, muscle stiffness, and other symptoms such as fatigue, sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression. Although it affects 2 to 4% of the population, its exact causes are not yet fully understood. Conventional treatments include antidepressants and analgesics, but many patients seek alternatives because of the side effects of traditional medications. In this context, acupuncture has gained attention as a promising therapeutic option, prompting researchers to scientifically investigate its efficacy.
This study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality and strength of the available evidence on the use of acupuncture in the treatment of fibromyalgia. To this end, the investigators conducted a comprehensive review of the scientific literature, searching 11 international databases for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses published through May 2025. They applied rigorous selection criteria, including only studies that analyzed randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in patients with fibromyalgia diagnosed by established medical criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using specific tools such as AMSTAR-2, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE, which are internationally recognized instruments for evaluating the reliability of systematic reviews.
The analysis included 13 systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 2007 and 2022, which examined a total of 45 primary studies involving hundreds of patients. The results showed that acupuncture demonstrated superiority compared with both sham acupuncture and conventional pharmacologic treatments. Specifically, acupuncture was more effective than sham acupuncture in reducing pain, with a mean difference of 1.04 points on the visual analog scale. When compared with conventional medications, the difference was even greater, reaching 1.77 points.
Beyond pain relief, acupuncture showed significant benefits in reducing fatigue, improving sleep, decreasing the number of tender points, and increasing the pressure-pain threshold. Importantly, no serious adverse events were reported — only mild reactions such as small bruises or discomfort at the needling site.
For patients with fibromyalgia and clinicians, these findings suggest that acupuncture can be considered a valid and safe therapeutic option. The observed benefits include not only pain reduction, the most limiting symptom of the condition, but also improvements in other important aspects of quality of life, such as fatigue and sleep. Treatment safety is another relevant aspect, especially considering that many traditional medications can cause significant side effects. For clinicians, the results indicate that acupuncture can be integrated into multidisciplinary treatment plans, offering a complementary approach that may reduce dependence on medications.
However, it is important that treatment be delivered by qualified, experienced clinicians.
Despite the promising results, the study identified important limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. The methodological quality of the reviews analyzed varied considerably, with only one classified as high quality and eight as low or critically low quality. Most primary studies had methodological problems such as inadequate blinding, insufficient description of randomization methods, and possible publication bias. In addition, there was substantial variability among studies in the types of acupuncture used, application points, treatment frequency, and comparison criteria.
The certainty of evidence, evaluated by the GRADE system, was rated as moderate to very low across most outcomes. These limitations indicate that, although the results are encouraging, more methodologically high-quality studies are needed to definitively establish the efficacy of acupuncture in fibromyalgia and guide more robust clinical recommendations.
Strengths
- 1Comprehensive analysis of multiple systematic reviews
- 2Use of validated assessment tools (AMSTAR-2, PRISMA, GRADE)
- 3Protocol registered in PROSPERO
- 4Search across 11 databases
Limitations
- 1High overlap among primary studies
- 2Most studies of low methodological quality
- 3Significant heterogeneity among studies
- 4Possible publication bias
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Fibromyalgia is one of the greatest challenges in chronic pain services: approved medications — duloxetine, pregabalin, milnacipran — offer partial relief and frequently produce intolerance, and patients arrive at the consultation already frustrated by unsatisfactory responses. This overview of 13 systematic reviews, covering trials from 2007 to 2022, consolidates evidence that acupuncture produces clinically measurable pain reduction and improvement on the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire compared both with sham and with conventional pharmacotherapy. For the pain specialist, this means that acupuncture finds its most legitimate place in the recurring profile: a woman of productive age, established central sensitization, reduced pressure-pain threshold, non-restorative sleep, and disproportionate fatigue. Integrating acupuncture into multimodal protocols — alongside supervised aerobic exercise and pain neuroscience education — now has enough support to justify a structured indication, not merely as a last resort.
▸ Notable Findings
The most striking data point is not the superiority over sham — expected and biologically plausible through recruitment of endogenous opioid and serotonergic systems — but rather the magnitude of the difference against conventional medications: a mean difference of 1.77 points on the visual analog scale, against 1.04 when compared with sham. In practical terms, outperforming standard pharmacotherapy by that effect size in a condition of central sensitization suggests that acupuncture mobilizes descending inhibitory mechanisms that available drugs do not recruit equivalently. The 2.38-point reduction in tender point count — an outcome that objectively reflects the pressure threshold — is equally relevant, since it demonstrates modulation of hyperalgesia rather than purely subjective analgesia. The safety profile, restricted to bruising and local discomfort, favors continued use even in polymedicated patients, where pharmacokinetic interactions are a real concern.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the USP musculoskeletal pain outpatient clinic, fibromyalgia is a frequent indication for acupuncture, but with calibrated expectations from the first consultation. I typically observe an initial subjective response — improved sleep and reduced intensity of pain flares — between the third and fifth session; patients who show no sign of response by the eighth session are unlikely to benefit from continuing the method in isolation. The protocol I have associated with the best results combines weekly acupuncture with a progressive walking program and, when there is a prominent depressive-anxious component, maintenance of low-dose duloxetine. Electroacupuncture at Zusanli (ST-36) and Sanyinjiao (SP-6) has shown, empirically, more consistent response in this group than manual acupuncture alone — a finding that aligns with the mechanistic signal of this article. The profile that responds best, in my accumulated observation, is the patient with predominant fatigue and diffuse allodynia without a large component of refractory catastrophizing; when catastrophizing dominates the picture, I require psychological intervention before expecting a meaningful response to acupuncture.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Frontiers in Medicine · 2025
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1712065
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories