Efficacy of acupuncture-related therapies for gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Choi et al. · Frontiers in Medicine · 2026

📊Systematic Review and Meta-analysis👥n=390 participantsModerate Evidence

Evidence Level

MODERATE
65/ 100
Quality
3/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
2/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough (GERC)

👥

WHO

390 adults with diagnosed GERC

⏱️

DURATION

4 to 8 weeks of treatment

📍

POINTS

Dorsal Governor Vessel (GV-6 to GV-12), Neiguan (PC-6), Zusanli (ST-36), Zhongwan (CV-12)

🔬 Study Design

390participants
randomization

Acupuncture group

n=195

Acupuncture alone or combined with Western medications

Control group

n=195

Western medications (proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics)

⏱️ Duration: 4 to 8 weeks

📊 Results in numbers

-0.41 points

Reduction in daytime cough

-0.38 points

Reduction in nighttime cough

+2.29 points

Quality-of-life improvement (LCQ)

85% vs. 75%

Total effectiveness rate

Percentage highlights

85% vs. 75%
Total effectiveness rate

📊 Outcome Comparison

Daytime cough score

Acupuncture
1.7
Control
2.1

Quality of life (LCQ)

Acupuncture
14.6
Control
12.3
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study shows that acupuncture can be a safe and effective option for relieving chronic cough caused by gastroesophageal reflux. The results suggest that acupuncture helps reduce both daytime and nighttime cough, significantly improving patients' quality of life.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition that affects millions of people worldwide, characterized by the return of gastric contents into the esophagus. One of the lesser-recognized but clinically important manifestations of GERD is gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough (GERC), which represents approximately 25-40% of chronic cough cases in clinical practice. GERC presents unique diagnostic challenges, as up to 75% of patients do not have the classic symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation, hindering early and appropriate diagnosis. Conventional treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), although the gold standard for GERD, often shows limited efficacy for GERC, especially in cases involving non-acid reflux or esophageal hypersensitivity.

This therapeutic limitation has motivated growing interest in complementary and alternative therapies, particularly acupuncture, which has shown therapeutic potential through multiple mechanisms of action. Acupuncture, a central modality of traditional Chinese medicine, theoretically acts on GERC through regulation of gastrointestinal motility, modulation of vagal tone, inhibition of acid secretion, and elevation of esophageal sensory thresholds. Specific points such as Zusanli (ST-36), Neiguan (PC-6), and Zhongwan (CV-12) have been particularly studied for their ability to strengthen the lower esophageal sphincter and reduce both acid and bile reflux. This systematic review and meta-analysis represents one of the first comprehensive evaluations of the efficacy of acupuncture specifically for GERC.

Investigators conducted a systematic search of 11 international and regional databases through June 2025, identifying randomized controlled trials that evaluated acupuncture-related therapies for GERC. Methodology rigorously followed PRISMA guidelines, with a protocol pre-registered in PROSPERO. Five randomized controlled trials involving 390 participants were included in the final analysis, published between 2018 and 2020, all conducted in China. Studies evaluated acupuncture protocols mainly targeting the dorsal segment of the Governor Vessel (GV-6 to GV-12), with some including stimulation of non-acupuncture points.

Sample sizes ranged from 30 to 51 participants per group, with treatment duration between 4 and 8 weeks. Control groups received Western medications including PPIs such as pantoprazole, omeprazole, and esomeprazole, in addition to prokinetic agents such as domperidone and mosapride citrate. Meta-analysis results demonstrated consistent benefits of acupuncture across multiple clinical outcomes. For daytime cough, acupuncture showed statistically significant improvement compared with controls (mean difference = -0.41, 95% CI [-0.75, -0.07]), with moderate heterogeneity.

Similarly, nighttime cough scores were significantly improved in the acupuncture group (mean difference = -0.38, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.17]). Quality of life, measured by the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), showed substantial improvements in the acupuncture group (mean difference = 2.29, 95% CI [1.99, 2.60]), representing a clinically significant benefit. Total effectiveness rate also significantly favored acupuncture (risk ratio = 1.13, 95% CI [1.01, 1.27]), with 85% effectiveness versus 75% in the control group. Regarding safety, no serious adverse events were reported in any of the included studies, with only minor events such as transient needle pain or local ecchymoses, which did not lead to treatment discontinuation.

Risk-of-bias assessment using the RoB 2 tool revealed methodological limitations, particularly related to blinding and allocation concealment. GRADE assessment rated the certainty of evidence as moderate to low, mainly due to study design limitations, small sample sizes, and moderate heterogeneity. The clinical implications of these findings are promising but require cautious interpretation. Acupuncture demonstrates potential as a safe complementary therapy for GERC, offering benefits both as standalone treatment and in combination with conventional medicine.

Results suggest that acupuncture may be particularly valuable for patients with suboptimal response to PPIs or those seeking integrated treatment approaches. However, several important limitations must be considered, including the relatively small number of studies, limited sample sizes, and all studies conducted in China, limiting generalizability to other populations and health care systems.

Strengths

  • 1First meta-analysis specifically focused on GERC
  • 2Comprehensive systematic search across multiple databases
  • 3Inclusion only of randomized controlled trials
  • 4Rigorous application of statistical methods
  • 5Systematic risk-of-bias assessment with RoB 2
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Limited number of included studies (only 5 RCTs)
  • 2Small sample sizes of individual studies
  • 3All studies conducted in China, limiting generalizability
  • 4Lack of adequate blinding in studies
  • 5Moderate heterogeneity in some outcomes
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Chronic cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux represents one of the most frustrating diagnoses in internal medicine and pulmonology clinics — precisely because up to three-quarters of patients have no heartburn or regurgitation, and proton pump inhibitors so often disappoint, especially in cases with non-acid reflux or esophageal hypersensitivity. In this scenario, a meta-analysis documenting additional benefit from acupuncture — a 2.29-point improvement on LCQ and an effectiveness rate of 85% versus 75% in controls — offers the clinician a concrete and safe alternative to round out the therapeutic arsenal. The most obvious candidate profile is the patient with confirmed GERC, partial response to PPI after eight weeks, with no serious adverse events recorded in the included studies. Early integration of acupuncture, rather than reserving it as a last resort, aligns with the multimodal care model that has become standard in referral centers.

Notable Findings

Among the findings deserving attention, the robustness of the impact on quality of life stands out: a 2.29-point mean difference on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire exceeds the minimal clinically important change threshold described in the literature for this instrument, transforming a statistical figure into something palpable for the patient who wakes up at night coughing. The symmetry between reductions in daytime and nighttime cough — mean differences of -0.41 and -0.38, respectively — suggests that the mechanism is not purely postural or gravitational but involves central or autonomic modulation sustained throughout the 24 hours. The protocols' focus on the GV-6 to GV-12 segments, along with the use of points such as Zusanli and Neiguan, reinforces the hypothesis that the efferent vagal pathway and control of lower esophageal sphincter tone are relevant targets, lending coherent pathophysiological logic to the observed results.

From My Experience

In my practice at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, I have treated patients with GERC referred by pulmonologists and gastroenterologists after PPI monotherapy failure, and the pattern I observe is consistent with what this meta-analysis documents: response begins to become noticeable between the third and fifth sessions — typically the patient reports less interrupted nights and lower frequency of daytime episodes. I usually complete eight to twelve sessions before reassessing the picture, maintaining biweekly maintenance sessions for another two to three months in responders. I routinely combine postural guidance, head-of-bed elevation, and dietary adjustment, since acupuncture enhances but does not replace behavioral measures. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with GERC without evident endoscopic erosion and with a hypersensitivity component — exactly the group in which PPI alone fails most often. I do not indicate isolated acupuncture when there is severe erosive esophagitis or large hiatal hernia; in these cases, it serves as an adjunct to medical and possibly surgical treatment.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Frontiers in Medicine · 2026

DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1712003

Access original article
CITED IN · 01 PAGE

Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.