Real-time location of acupuncture points based on anatomical landmarks and pose estimation models
Malekroodi et al. · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · 2024
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Develop artificial intelligence systems to automatically locate acupuncture points on the face and hands in real time
WHO
194 participants (49 men, 45 women, ages 19-68 years) from Korean universities
DURATION
Laboratory-controlled data collection with analysis of 5,997 images
POINTS
38 points total - 20 on the face (CV-24, BL-1, BL-2, etc.) and 18 on the hands (HT-7, LI-4, TE-3, etc.)
🔬 Study Design
Anatomical landmark-based approach
n=188
MediaPipe system for detection of 38 points
Deep learning approach
n=194
YOLOv8-pose model for detection of 5 specific points
📊 Results in numbers
Mean localization error - Anatomical landmark method
Mean average precision (mAP) - YOLOv8 model
Mean localization error - YOLOv8 model
Points detected simultaneously
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Localization error (mm)
This study developed two artificial intelligence technologies that can automatically identify the correct acupuncture points on the face and hands using only a camera. The systems are highly accurate (error less than 5 mm) and operate in real time, helping both practitioners and acupuncture students locate points with greater precision and consistency.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Acupuncture is one of the oldest medical practices in the world, with thousands of years of history. This therapy uses fine needles inserted at specific body points known as acupoints, located along meridians or energy channels. Although these points have traditionally been identified through palpation and anatomical knowledge passed down through generations, manual localization can be imprecise, especially when performed by individuals without adequate training. Accuracy in identifying these points is fundamental to treatment efficacy, creating a need for more precise and consistent localization methods.
This study, conducted by researchers at Pukyong National University in South Korea and published in November 2024, investigated how artificial intelligence can be applied to automate and improve accuracy in identifying acupuncture points. The researchers developed and compared two different approaches using computer vision: one using real-time anatomical landmark detection and another based on deep neural networks specialized in pose estimation. The goal was to create systems that could automatically identify acupuncture points on the face and hands with high precision, making this ancient practice more accessible and accurate for both practitioners and beginners.
The study methodology involved two distinct strategies. In the first approach, the researchers used Google's MediaPipe framework, a computer vision tool that detects anatomical landmarks in real time. This technique identified 468 reference points on the face and 21 points on the hands, using these landmarks as a basis to mathematically calculate the location of 38 specific acupuncture points through formulas based on traditional proportional measurements from Chinese medicine. The second approach used a convolutional neural network called YOLOv8-pose, specifically trained with a custom database containing nearly 6,000 images annotated by experts.
This model was developed to directly detect five specific acupuncture points on the arm and hand. To validate both methods, the researchers compared the locations predicted by the systems with those manually marked by experts in oriental medicine.
The results demonstrated that both approaches achieved high accuracy in locating acupuncture points. The anatomical landmark-based system was able to map multiple points on both the face and hands with mean localization error below 5 millimeters when compared with expert annotations. This method proved particularly effective for facial points, likely due to the larger number of anatomical landmarks available in this region. The deep neural network approach also demonstrated excellent performance, achieving 99% mean average precision in detecting the five specific points studied.
The model was able to locate points near the fingertips with greater precision than those located in the middle of the hand, suggesting that certain anatomical features are more easily identifiable by the system. Both methods were able to operate in real time, processing video images instantaneously.
For patients and acupuncture practitioners, these findings represent significant advances with important practical implications. For experienced practitioners, these systems can serve as support tools, increasing confidence and precision during treatments, especially in situations where manual localization can be more challenging. For students and beginners in acupuncture, the technology offers a valuable educational tool, allowing more efficient and standardized learning of point localization. The researchers developed a demonstration application that allows real-time visualization of acupuncture points through a webcam, demonstrating the practical potential of this technology.
For patients, this can mean more precise and consistent treatments, regardless of the therapist's experience level, potentially improving therapeutic outcomes.
The study has some important limitations that should be considered. The database used to train the neural network was relatively small and collected in a controlled environment, which may limit the system's ability to function adequately in real-world situations with greater variability. The images were captured against a white background and with relatively uniform poses, conditions that may not reflect the diversity encountered in daily clinical practice. In addition, quantitative evaluation focused mainly on points on the hands and arms, with less data available for validation of facial points.
The lack of large public databases with expert-annotated acupuncture points also represents a challenge for the future development of this technology. The researchers acknowledge that additional work is needed to expand these systems to other parts of the body, such as legs and trunk, and to test their efficacy in a wider variety of environmental conditions and patient types. Despite these limitations, this work represents an important step toward modernizing acupuncture through integration with artificial intelligence technologies, offering a solid foundation for future developments in this promising area.
Strengths
- 1High accuracy in point localization (error < 5 mm)
- 2Operates in real time with a standard camera
- 3Two complementary methods validated
- 4Practical interface developed for clinical use
- 5Innovative AI approach for traditional medicine
Limitations
- 1Limited to face and hand points only
- 2Dataset collected in a controlled environment
- 3Lack of diversity in hand poses
- 4Not tested under real clinical conditions
- 5Proprietary MediaPipe model does not allow full customization
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Accurate localization of acupoints is one of the pillars that distinguishes a technically rigorous acupuncture treatment from an imprecise intervention. In this context, the proposal by Malekroodi et al. has immediate relevance for medical education in the specialty: a system capable of mapping 38 facial and hand points with error below 5 mm, in real time and using a conventional camera, offers the preceptor an objective tool for evaluating residents in training. In clinical practice, guided telemedicine scenarios — where the physician instructs a patient to apply pressure or monitor a specific point at home — also benefit directly from an accessible visual interface. Geriatric populations with anatomical variations, patients with overweight or regional edema, and those with verbal communication difficulties are groups in which technological confirmation complements clinical judgment without replacing it.
▸ Notable Findings
What makes the work technically interesting is the convergence of two independent methods to the same performance level: the geometric approach via MediaPipe and the supervised YOLOv8-pose model both reached errors below 5 mm, a threshold generally accepted as clinically acceptable for most systemic points. The 99% mean average precision on YOLOv8 mAP for five upper-limb points is an impressive result, although obtained in a controlled sample. Another noteworthy finding is the spatial gradation of accuracy: points near the digital extremities — anatomically more defined — were located with greater accuracy than those in the mid-dorsum of the hand, which echoes the clinical experience that LI-4, for example, is more consistently identified across examiners than points in regions with less anatomical relief.
▸ From My Experience
At the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, a considerable part of our teaching effort consists precisely of correcting point localization in residents — and the subjectivity of this process has always been a bottleneck. I have observed that systematic errors of 8 to 12 mm at points such as ST-36 or LI-4 compromise outcomes, especially in neuromodulation protocols where point specificity matters mechanistically. Tools like the one described in this article could shorten the learning curve, which in my experience takes two to three months of intense supervised practice for a resident to achieve acceptable consistency. For patients in treatment, I usually combine acupuncture with progressive exercise and, when necessary, adjuvant pharmacotherapy; the technology discussed here does not change this flow but can ensure that the needling component is performed with comparable standardization across sessions. The profile that benefits most immediately is the early-career physician and the service that needs to audit its own technical quality.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Frontiers in Neurorobotics · 2024
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1484038
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories