A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Therapeutic Effect of Acupuncture on Migraine
Ou et al. · Frontiers in Neurology · 2020
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
Investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for migraine compared with medications and sham acupuncture
WHO
2,874 patients diagnosed with migraine from 28 randomized controlled trials
DURATION
1- to 2-month treatments with follow-up of up to 6 months
POINTS
Points on the Shaoyang meridians, including traditional acupuncture and electroacupuncture
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture Group
n=1396
Traditional acupuncture or electroacupuncture
Medication Group
n=865
Flunarizine, ergotamine, or other medications
Sham Acupuncture Group
n=613
Acupuncture at non-specific points
📊 Results in numbers
Efficacy vs sham acupuncture
Efficacy vs medication
VAS scale reduction vs sham
Adverse events rate
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Clinical Efficacy Rate
Reduction in Attack Frequency
This large study shows that acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture and than medications for preventing migraine attacks. In addition to reducing the frequency and intensity of headaches, acupuncture has fewer side effects than traditional medications, making it a safe option for the preventive treatment of migraine.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
**Acupuncture as a Treatment for Migraine: A Comprehensive Analysis of 28 Clinical Trials**
Migraine is one of the most challenging and impactful neurological conditions of our time, affecting millions of people around the world. Characterized by intense, throbbing headaches, often accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and excessive sensitivity to light and sound, migraine can be extremely debilitating. The Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 ranked migraine as the sixth most disabling disease globally, evidencing its enormous impact for both individuals and society. The conventional treatments available, although they may provide relief, are frequently associated with significant side effects and may not be able to fully prevent attacks, especially when used over long periods.
This scenario has led researchers and healthcare professionals to investigate alternative and complementary therapies, with acupuncture being one of the most promising options due to its demonstrated efficacy in clinical studies and its favorable safety profile.
This study represents a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis that examined 28 randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of migraine. The researchers conducted extensive searches in eight major medical databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and specialized Chinese databases, covering publications from January 2000 to March 2019. To ensure the quality of the research, only studies that followed rigorous criteria were included: patients with a clear diagnosis of migraine, treatment groups that received exclusively acupuncture, control groups that used sham acupuncture or conventional medications, and standardized assessments of outcomes using measures such as attack frequency, duration, pain intensity through the visual analog scale, and cerebral blood flow examinations. The final analysis included 2,874 patients distributed in three groups: 1,396 received real acupuncture, 865 used conventional medications, and 613 received sham acupuncture.
The results of this research were consistently favorable to acupuncture in multiple aspects. When compared with sham acupuncture, true acupuncture demonstrated statistically significant superiority in virtually all evaluated measures. Patients who received real acupuncture experienced an average reduction of 1.00 point in the monthly frequency of migraine attacks, an improvement that may seem modest numerically but represents substantial relief for those suffering from this condition. Pain intensity, measured by the visual analog scale where zero represents absence of pain and ten represents unbearable pain, showed an average reduction of 0.59 points in the acupuncture group compared with the group that received sham acupuncture.
In addition, the overall efficacy rate of treatment was significantly superior, with more patients experiencing clinically relevant improvement. When acupuncture was compared with conventional medications, the results were even more impressive, showing not only greater therapeutic efficacy but also a substantially better safety profile, with an adverse events rate of only 0.01% compared with the 11.39% observed in the medication group.
A particularly interesting finding was the analysis of cerebral blood flow through transcranial Doppler. Migraine is frequently associated with alterations in cerebral circulation, and the researchers found that acupuncture was superior to conventional medications in improving blood flow velocity in the major cerebral arteries. Specifically, there were significant improvements in the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries, suggesting that acupuncture may have direct beneficial effects on the vascular pathophysiology underlying migraine. This finding is important because it offers a possible scientific explanation for the therapeutic effects observed, going beyond simple symptomatic relief to address fundamental mechanisms of the disease.
The clinical implications of these findings are substantial for both patients and healthcare professionals. For patients, especially those suffering from side effects of conventional medications or who present an inadequate response to traditional treatments, acupuncture emerges as a viable and effective therapeutic option. The very low incidence of adverse effects makes acupuncture particularly attractive for long-term preventive use, a crucial consideration given that migraine is frequently a chronic condition that requires ongoing management. For healthcare professionals, these results suggest that acupuncture should be considered as an integral part of a multidisciplinary approach to migraine treatment, whether as primary or complementary therapy.
The evidence of improvement in cerebral circulation also suggests that acupuncture may have preventive benefits, potentially reducing not only the intensity and frequency of attacks but also modifying the underlying pathophysiological processes.
However, it is essential to recognize the important limitations of this analysis. Heterogeneity among studies was considerable, reflecting differences in the acupuncture protocols used, in the selection of specific points, in treatment duration, and in evaluation criteria. Most of the included studies had relatively small sample sizes, and few were conducted as multicenter studies, which may limit the generalization of the results. In addition, the nature of acupuncture makes it extremely difficult to conduct true double-blind studies, since the acupuncturist necessarily knows the type of treatment being administered.
Funnel plot analysis suggested the possible existence of publication bias, indicating that studies with negative results may have been less likely to be published. Despite these methodological limitations, the consistency of the favorable results for acupuncture across multiple outcomes and the magnitude of the effects observed strengthen the credibility of the conclusions.
This research represents a significant contribution to the evidence base on acupuncture in the treatment of migraine, convincingly demonstrating that this ancient therapy has measurable clinical efficacy and a favorable safety profile. The results support the use of acupuncture as a legitimate therapeutic option for patients with migraine, offering an alternative or complement to conventional pharmacological treatments. For future developments in the area, the researchers emphasize the need for prospective multicenter studies with larger samples and more standardized protocols, which could provide even more robust evidence and guide the development of more specific clinical guidelines for the use of acupuncture in migraine management.
Strengths
- 1Large sample with 2,874 patients from 28 studies
- 2Comparison with active controls (medications) and placebo
- 3Assessment of multiple outcomes including safety
- 4Analysis of hemodynamic changes by transcranial Doppler
- 5Rigorous methodology following Cochrane guidelines
Limitations
- 1Significant heterogeneity among some studies
- 2Most studies with small samples (40-60 patients)
- 3Few multicenter studies included
- 4Difficulty of adequate blinding in acupuncture studies
- 5Variation in acupuncture protocols among studies
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Migraine represents one of the most frequent diagnoses in pain outpatient clinics, and the practical question that arises daily is how to optimize prophylaxis without overburdening the patient with adverse effects of medications such as flunarizine or ergotamine. This meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials with 2,874 patients responds directly to this dilemma: acupuncture surpassed both sham acupuncture and conventional drugs in overall efficacy, with an adverse events rate of RR=0.16 versus the medication group. This positions acupuncture as a first-line option for patients who do not tolerate pharmacological prophylaxis, for pregnant women with chronic migraine in whom the medication arsenal is restricted, and for those with a history of complex drug interactions. The demonstration of hemodynamic improvement by transcranial Doppler in the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries adds pathophysiological substrate to the indication, reinforcing that the therapeutic effect goes beyond symptom control.
▸ Notable Findings
The finding that deserves special attention is that the difference in efficacy versus sham acupuncture (MD=1.88) is greater than the difference versus medication (MD=1.16), suggesting that the specificity of the needled points has real weight in the outcome and that true acupuncture surpasses even the effect of the therapeutic context. The reduction of 1.00 point on the VAS scale versus the sham group, although numerically modest, translates into a concrete functional difference for those living with recurrent attacks. Even more relevant is the hemodynamic analysis: improvement of flow in the three cerebral arteries assessed by transcranial Doppler points to a vasoregulatory mechanism that aligns acupuncture with what we know about migraine pathophysiology, namely the dysfunction of the trigeminovascular system and the oscillations of vasoconstriction and vasodilation that precede and accompany attacks. This datum brings the discussion of mechanism of action closer to the vocabulary of contemporary neurology and physiatry.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in the pain outpatient clinic, I usually see the first responses to acupuncture in migraine around the third or fourth session — reduction in attack intensity or in rescue analgesic consumption. For stabilization of monthly frequency, generally between eight and twelve sessions are necessary in the initial cycle, with monthly maintenance afterward. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with high-frequency episodic migraine who already presents the phenomenon of analgesic medication overuse: removing the abuse cycle and introducing acupuncture simultaneously has generated consistent results. I routinely associate biofeedback and sleep hygiene guidance, and in patients with associated cervicogenic component I include dry needling of suboccipital muscle trigger points. I do not indicate acupuncture as monotherapy in migraine with frequent aura and uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors, where investigation and supervised pharmacological prophylaxis take priority. The hemodynamic Doppler findings in this work are consistent with what I have observed clinically in patients who report less sensation of intracranial heaviness and pulsation after the complete cycle.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Frontiers in Neurology · 2020
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00596
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories