Skip to content

Progress of Acupuncture Therapy in Diseases Based on Magnetic Resonance Image Studies: A Literature Review

Zhang et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2021

📚Systematic Review👥107 studies included🏥High Impact

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
5/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Review magnetic resonance imaging studies on the neural mechanisms of acupuncture across different diseases

👥

WHO

Analysis of 107 studies with 2,957 patients and 928 healthy controls

⏱️

PERIOD

Studies published from 2006 to 2021

📍

POINTS

GB-34 (Yanglingquan) was the most studied point, followed by ST-36 (Zusanli)

🔬 Study Design

3885participants
randomization

Patients

n=2957

Different pathological conditions treated with acupuncture

Healthy controls

n=928

Healthy individuals for comparison

⏱️ Duration: Analysis of 15 years of studies

📊 Results in numbers

0

Studies included in the review

Stroke

Most studied condition

Functional connectivity (FC)

Most used analytical method

Resting-state fMRI

Predominant experimental design

Percentage highlights

Stroke
Most studied condition
Functional connectivity (FC)
Most used analytical method
Resting-state fMRI
Predominant experimental design

📊 Outcome Comparison

Types of diseases studied

Neurologic
40
Digestive
15
Other
45
💬 What does this mean for you?

This review shows that acupuncture produces specific changes in the brain, primarily in areas related to the disease being treated. The studies demonstrate that patients respond differently than healthy individuals, suggesting that acupuncture has more pronounced effects in pathological conditions.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Acupuncture is a millennia-old therapeutic practice from traditional Chinese medicine that has been gaining growing worldwide acceptance because of its demonstrated beneficial effects in various health conditions. Although clinical studies have proven its efficacy in the treatment of depression, ischemic stroke, migraine, functional diarrhea, and Alzheimer disease, the brain mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic effects of acupuncture are still not completely understood. This knowledge gap has generated skepticism in the scientific community and has limited broader acceptance of this therapeutic modality. In recent decades, functional magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as a valuable tool for investigating how acupuncture influences brain function, offering a unique opportunity to unravel the mysteries behind this ancient medical practice.

This study aimed primarily to provide a comprehensive and updated review of the scientific literature on the effects of acupuncture on the brain, using functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients with different clinical conditions. The researchers carried out a systematic search in four major scientific databases — PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library — from the start of publications through January 2021. Only original studies published in English that used true acupuncture, electroacupuncture, or laser acupuncture in patients with specific diseases were included, excluding studies involving only healthy volunteers. The rigorous methodology resulted in the selection of 107 studies that met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 2,957 patients and 928 healthy controls.

The results revealed interesting patterns about the current state of acupuncture neuroimaging research. Stroke was the most studied condition, representing the largest proportion of analyzed works, followed by other neurologic and digestive conditions. The acupoint GB-34 (Yanglingquan), located on the lateral leg, emerged as the most frequently used, especially for treatment of stroke and Parkinson disease. This point, according to traditional Chinese medicine theory, is considered the meeting point of the gallbladder meridian and the influential point of the tendons, traditionally used to treat motor system disorders.

The studies showed that stimulation of GB-34 mainly activates brain regions related to movement, including the premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, and supramarginal gyrus. In methodologic terms, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and functional connectivity analysis were the most used approaches, representing a growing trend in recent years of research.

The clinical implications of these findings are significant for both patients and health care professionals. The study demonstrated that the effects of acupuncture on the brain differ substantially between patients with pathologic conditions and healthy individuals, suggesting that acupuncture has a therapeutic specificity that is manifested primarily in states of imbalance or disease. In patients, the brain activation induced by acupuncture predominantly occurs in regions related to the specific condition being treated, supporting the traditional Chinese medicine theory that acupuncture acts by restoring the body's internal balance. The researchers also identified several factors that influence the efficacy of acupuncture, including depth of needle insertion, the sensation of de qi (the specific sensation obtained during acupuncture), the number and location of points used, and psychological factors such as patient expectation.

Particularly important was the finding that deep acupuncture was more effective than superficial acupuncture for certain conditions, and that the combination of multiple acupuncture points activated more extensive brain regions than single points.

The study also addressed the controversial issue of placebo acupuncture, revealing that the type of placebo control used significantly affects results. The researchers identified three main types of placebo control: cutaneous stimulation at the same points, use of blunt needles that do not penetrate the skin, and insertion of needles at non-acupuncture points. Each type produced different patterns of brain activation, highlighting the importance of properly choosing the control group in acupuncture studies. This finding has important implications for the design of future clinical studies and for the interpretation of results from prior research.

Despite the promising findings, the study acknowledges several important limitations that must be considered in interpreting the results. The small sample size in most analyzed studies limits the generalizability of the findings, while significant heterogeneity in experimental designs and analytical methods makes direct comparisons across studies difficult. Standardization of magnetic resonance imaging parameters and acupuncture protocols is still inconsistent, contributing to the variability of results. In addition, most studies focused on the immediate effects of acupuncture, with few investigating the effects of prolonged treatments that are more representative of real clinical practice.

The authors also note that nonspecific factors, such as the psychological attitude of participants toward acupuncture and the type of disease studied, may significantly interfere with observed brain responses.

To advance this field of research, the authors recommend that future studies use larger samples, more careful experimental designs, and multimodal neuroimaging techniques. Standardization of acupuncture methods and magnetic resonance imaging parameters is essential to increase homogeneity of results and allow more reliable comparisons across studies. It is also necessary to develop studies that investigate the effects of long-term acupuncture treatments, which are more relevant to clinical practice. The incorporation of machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques may eventually allow personalized prediction of acupuncture efficacy based on individual brain activation patterns.

This work represents an important step toward establishing a solid scientific basis for acupuncture, potentially leading to greater acceptance of this therapeutic modality in modern medicine and contributing to the development of more effective and personalized treatments for various health conditions.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive analysis of 107 studies
  • 2Rigorous systematic review methodology
  • 3Analysis of multiple neuroimaging techniques
  • 4Comparison across different types of acupuncture
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Small samples in individual studies
  • 2Large heterogeneity across studies
  • 3Different experimental designs
  • 4Varied analytical methods
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Functional neuroimaging applied to acupuncture has moved beyond academic curiosity to become a tool of clinical legitimation. This review of 107 studies, covering 15 years of scientific output with nearly three thousand patients, consolidates a view that changes the conversation with skeptics: acupuncture produces condition-specific brain changes — that is, the activation pattern observed in a poststroke patient differs from that observed in healthy individuals undergoing the same stimulation. This has direct implications for practice — it means that the nervous system in a pathologic state responds in a qualitatively distinct way, which partly explains why point-standardized protocols work clinically even without extreme individualization. For the physiatrist who cares for patients with neurologic sequelae, chronic migraine, or musculoskeletal pain of central origin, this body of evidence justifies integration of acupuncture into the rehabilitation program with neurophysiologic support, rather than merely empirical grounds.

Notable Findings

The most relevant finding of this review is the dissociation between brain responses of patients and healthy controls. While healthy volunteers show diffuse and less consistent activations, patients with neurologic or functional conditions exhibit preferential modulation in circuits directly related to their disease — motor circuits in stroke, pain networks in migraine, nigrostriatal connectivity in Parkinson disease. The point GB-34, the most used in the studies, activates the premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, and supramarginal gyrus, structures central to motor rehabilitation. Another important finding is the effect of placebo control: the three types tested — superficial skin stimulation, blunt needles, and insertion at non-acupuncture points — generated distinct neuroimaging patterns, which invalidates the idea that any needling produces an identical nonspecific response. Deep acupuncture with de qi achievement also demonstrated more robust activation than superficial acupuncture, providing a neurobiologic substrate for refined manual technique.

From My Experience

In my practice in the pain and rehabilitation clinic, we have long observed that patients with established neurologic injury — stroke, Parkinson disease, neuropathies — tend to respond to electroacupuncture in a more expressive and consistent manner than individuals with isolated functional complaints. This always seemed paradoxical to conventional reasoning, but the neuroimaging data from this review make this pattern understandable: the diseased nervous system has more 'plastic territory' to be modulated. I typically see the first functional responses — improvement of spasticity, reduction of central pain, sleep quality — between the fourth and sixth session in neurologic patients, with a protocol of two weekly sessions. On average, I schedule 12 sessions before reassessing the maintenance plan. I associate electroacupuncture at GB-34 with motor physical therapy on the same day when possible, which potentiates the neuroplasticity window opened by stimulation. Patients with high negative expectation or psychological refractoriness to the procedure tend to have more modest responses — which this review endorses by mentioning psychological factors as a variable modulating brain response.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2021

DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.694919

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.