Revealing the Neural Mechanism Underlying the Effects of Acupuncture on Migraine: A Systematic Review
Liu et al. · Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2021
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the effects of acupuncture in the treatment of migraine through neuroimaging studies
WHO
634 patients with migraine without aura and 234 healthy volunteers across 15 studies
DURATION
Studies from January 2009 to June 2020, treatments ranging from a single session to 4 weeks
POINTS
21 points used, most frequent: TE-5 (Waiguan), GB-34 (Yanglingquan), GB-20 (Fengchi)
🔬 Study Design
Patients with migraine
n=634
Manual acupuncture or electroacupuncture
Healthy controls
n=234
Control group for comparison
📊 Results in numbers
Studies included in the review
Randomized controlled trials
Studies using fMRI
Studies focusing on sustained effect
Studies with clinical-neural correlation
📊 Outcome Comparison
Neuroimaging methods used
This study revealed that acupuncture modifies brain activity in a specific way in patients with migraine, primarily in brain networks related to pain processing. The preventive benefits of acupuncture appear to be related to the regulation of brain circuits important for pain control.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This systematic review represents an important milestone in understanding the neurologic mechanisms by which acupuncture exerts its therapeutic effects on migraine. Conducted by researchers at the Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the analysis systematically examined the neuroimaging literature on acupuncture for migraine published between 2009 and 2020. The comprehensive search in four major databases resulted in identification of 15 eligible studies, including 634 patients with migraine without aura and 234 healthy controls. The rigorous methodology followed PRISMA guidelines and included both randomized controlled trials and observational studies that used neuroimaging techniques to investigate the effects of acupuncture on the brain.
The included studies employed various neuroimaging techniques, with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) being the most used (80% of the studies), followed by PET-CT (13.3%) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (6.7%). Data analyses included sophisticated methods such as regional homogeneity analysis (ReHo), amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), independent component analysis (ICA), and functional connectivity. The results revealed two distinct patterns of neural effects of acupuncture: immediate effects during acute migraine treatment and sustained effects after prolonged treatment. For immediate effects, increased brain metabolism was observed in regions involved in cognitive and affective-emotional processing of pain, including the orbitofrontal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, and insula.
Resting-state networks, such as the default mode network and the limbic system, also showed significant alterations. As for sustained effects, which are fundamental to migraine prevention, acupuncture demonstrated modulation of multiple pain-related brain networks. Specifically, there was increased activity in regions of the affective-emotional processing of pain (insula, cerebellum, brainstem) and the cognitive processing of pain (orbitofrontal cortex), in addition to changes in the descending pain modulation system. Simultaneously, decreased activity was observed in regions of the cognitive processing of pain (hippocampus) and in resting-state networks such as the default mode network and the frontoparietal network.
A particularly interesting aspect was the analysis of the correlations between neural changes and clinical outcomes. Eight studies performed these correlations, revealing that improvement in pain intensity was negatively correlated with activity in specific regions such as anterior cingulate cortex, insula, thalamus, and cerebellum. These findings suggest that the prophylactic effect of acupuncture on migraine may occur through regulation of the visual network, default mode network, sensorimotor network, frontoparietal network, limbic system, and descending pain modulation system. The study also identified significant limitations in the current literature.
Most studies had small samples (ranging from 10 to 72 participants), only 53.3% assessed the psychological state of the participants (anxiety and depression), and only 20% avoided performing imaging during the menstrual period in women. In addition, there was great variability in acupuncture protocols, with 21 different points used, the most frequent being TE-5 (Waiguan), GB-34 (Yanglingquan), and GB-20 (Fengchi). The clinical implications of these findings are substantial. First, they provide a solid neurobiologic basis for the therapeutic effects of acupuncture on migraine, validating its efficacy through objective brain markers.
Second, the identification of specific neural networks may guide the development of more precise and personalized treatment protocols. Third, neural markers may serve as biomarkers to predict treatment response and identify patients who would benefit most from acupuncture. The authors emphasize the need for future studies with more rigorous designs, including larger samples, standardized acupuncture protocols, systematic psychological assessment, and multimodal studies that integrate different neuroimaging techniques. Particularly promising is the application of machine learning methods to develop predictive models of acupuncture efficacy based on pretreatment brain patterns.
Strengths
- 1First comprehensive systematic review on neuroimaging and acupuncture for migraine
- 2Rigorous methodology following PRISMA guidelines with search across multiple databases
- 3Detailed analysis of both immediate and sustained effects of acupuncture
- 4Clear identification of specific neural networks involved in therapeutic effects
- 5Critical discussion of methodologic limitations of included studies
Limitations
- 1Limited number of included studies (only 15 studies)
- 2Large variability in acupuncture protocols across studies
- 3Small samples in most included studies
- 4Heterogeneity in neuroimaging techniques and analysis methods
- 5Few studies assessed correlations between neural changes and clinical outcomes
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
For those who work with chronic pain, migraine without aura represents one of the most frustrating diagnoses: patients who do not tolerate first-line preventives, who have a high burden of psychiatric comorbidities, or who simply seek a sustainable nonpharmacologic alternative. This systematic review places functional neuroimaging at the service of clinical decision-making by demonstrating that acupuncture causes measurable reorganization in brain networks central to pain processing — insula, orbitofrontal cortex, descending modulation system, default mode network — and that these changes are negatively correlated with reported pain intensity. This stops being merely mechanistic support and becomes a concrete argument when discussing acupuncture as prophylaxis with patients and skeptical colleagues. The patient profile that benefits most includes those with high-frequency episodic migraine, refractory to or intolerant of topiramate and valproate, and patients who already show evident central sensitization on clinical evaluation.
▸ Notable Findings
The distinction between immediate effects and sustained effects is the finding that most deserves clinical attention. Immediate effects involve metabolic increase in regions of affective-emotional processing of pain, which would explain the acute relief reported by patients. Sustained effects — relevant for prophylaxis — show a more complex pattern: increased activity in insula, cerebellum, and brainstem with simultaneous reduction in the hippocampus and in default mode and frontoparietal networks. This bidirectional modulation suggests that acupuncture does not simply suppress painful activity but recalibrates descending inhibitory circuits and rumination networks — which echoes what we see clinically in patients with chronic migraine and a prominent central component. The correlations between activity in anterior cingulate, thalamus, and insula and clinical improvement open a real path for predictive biomarkers of response.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in the pain service, I usually observe perceptible clinical response in episodic migraine after four to six sessions — generally the patient reports reduction in crisis intensity even before noticing a drop in frequency. For sustained prophylaxis, I habitually work with cycles of 10 to 12 sessions, followed by monthly maintenance. The points GB-20, GB-34, and TE-5 are in fact the ones I most use in this context, and it is interesting to see that the review confirms their predominance in the neuroimaging literature. I systematically associate sleep hygiene guidance and, when there is an evident cervicogenic component, I combine with dry needling of trigger points in the suboccipital musculature. The profile that responds best in my experience is the female patient, between 30 and 50 years old, with migraine of predominantly hormonal trigger and strong emotional modulation — exactly the phenotype where the insula and the limbic system are most relevant. I avoid initiating cycles in patients with untreated generalized anxiety disorder, since the response is erratic until the psychiatric component is stabilized.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.674852
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories