Analgesic Efficacy of Acupuncture on Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study
Lin et al. · Healthcare · 2023
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
Evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain compared with control groups
WHO
1,455 patients with chronic pelvic pain (867 women and 588 men)
DURATION
Studies with treatments ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months
POINTS
Multiple points including CV-4, CV-6, SP-6, BL-23, BL-32, LI-4, among others
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture
n=728
Electroacupuncture, manual acupuncture, moxibustion, catgut implantation
Controls
n=727
Medications, sham acupuncture, physical therapy, standard care
📊 Results in numbers
Reduction on the NIH-CPSI scale
Reduction on the VAS/NRS scale
Efficacy as monotherapy
Efficacy as adjunctive therapy
📊 Outcome Comparison
Pain reduction (NIH-CPSI)
Pain reduction (VAS/NRS)
This analysis of 17 studies showed that acupuncture is effective in relieving chronic pelvic pain, whether used alone or together with other treatments. Patients treated with acupuncture had significant pain reduction compared with those who received other treatments or conventional care.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Chronic pelvic pain represents one of the most complex challenges in modern medicine, affecting millions of people worldwide and causing significant impact on both patients' quality of life and health care systems. Defined as pain in the pelvic region that persists for more than six months, this condition can manifest in different forms and may be associated with various urinary, sexual, bowel, muscular, or gynecologic disorders. Epidemiologic data reveal the magnitude of this problem, with prevalence rates varying drastically across different regions of the world — from 2.1% to 24% for noncyclic chronic pelvic pain, from 16.8% to 81% when associated with dysmenorrhea, and from 8% to 21.1% in intermittent cases related to dyspareunia. Particularly concerning is the fact that women are affected twice as often as men, and direct and indirect costs of this condition in the United States were estimated to have reached billions of dollars as early as the 1990s.
Management of chronic pelvic pain has proven especially challenging for health care professionals. A recent survey of members of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists revealed that 45% of respondents considered the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women to be "poor" or "very poor" in the United Kingdom. Even more telling was the fact that more than half of professionals identified "pain control" as the most important aspect of care, surpassing even "identifying the cause of the pain." This reality has led to recognition that medication alone is often inadequate, with multidisciplinary approaches that combine different therapeutic strategies — including physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, dietary modifications, neuromodulation, and lifestyle counseling — increasingly recommended.
This study aimed specifically to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The researchers conducted comprehensive searches in the PubMed and Embase databases, covering the period from January 2011 to September 2022, with no language restrictions. Various types of acupoint-stimulation–based interventions were included, such as electroacupuncture, manual acupuncture, moxibustion, abdominal acupuncture, catgut implantation, laser acupuncture, and acupressure. To assess outcomes, validated pain scales were used, including the visual analog scale, numeric rating scale, and the total pain scores of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index.
The rigorous methodology included independent quality assessment of the studies by multiple reviewers and statistical analysis using random-effects models.
The results of this meta-analysis were consistently favorable to acupuncture. Seventeen studies involving 1,455 patients were included in the final analysis, encompassing 867 women and 588 men with different etiologies of chronic pelvic pain, including endometriosis, inflammatory pelvic pain, pregnancy-related pelvic pain, and chronic pelvic pain syndrome/chronic prostatitis. The data revealed that acupuncture produced significantly lower pain levels compared with control groups, both when assessed by NIH-CPSI pain scores and by VAS/NRS scales. Particularly notable was the finding that virtually all acupuncture methods tested — including electroacupuncture, manual acupuncture, moxibustion, abdominal acupuncture, and auricular acupuncture — demonstrated superior efficacy compared with control treatments, with the exception of laser acupuncture.
The analysis also revealed that acupuncture maintained its efficacy both when used as adjunctive therapy and as monotherapy, suggesting it can be a valid option even when used alone.
The clinical implications of these results are substantial for both patients and health care professionals. For patients suffering from chronic pelvic pain, acupuncture represents a therapeutic option with proven efficacy that can be integrated into existing treatment plans or used as an alternative when other approaches have not been satisfactory. The versatility of acupuncture is particularly valuable, as it can be combined with other treatments or used alone, offering flexibility in personalized pain management. In addition, acupuncture has especially attractive features such as low cost, few side effects, and high compatibility with other therapeutic modalities.
For health care professionals, these findings provide robust evidence for including acupuncture in chronic pelvic pain treatment guidelines, especially given that pain control was identified as the highest priority in managing this condition. The efficacy of acupuncture as monotherapy also offers an important option for patients who cannot tolerate conventional medications, experience refractory pain, or have comorbidities that limit other therapeutic approaches.
Although the results are encouraging, several important limitations should be considered when interpreting these findings. First, for some specific methods such as moxibustion, auricular acupuncture, and abdominal acupuncture, only one study was included in the analysis, limiting the robustness of conclusions for these specific modalities. Second, most of the included studies showed some concerns regarding risk of bias, particularly in the "outcome measurement" domain, mainly because of the subjective nature of pain assessment by the patients themselves. Third, the significant heterogeneity found across some studies suggests that there may be important variations in treatment protocols, patient populations, or other factors influencing outcomes.
Future research should include larger-scale multicenter studies, more objective pain assessment systems, standardization of acupuncture protocols for different etiologies of chronic pelvic pain, and more detailed cost-effectiveness analyses. Despite these limitations, this meta-analysis provides convincing evidence that acupuncture can play a valuable role in the therapeutic arsenal for chronic pelvic pain, offering hope for millions of people suffering from this debilitating condition and contributing to more integrated and effective treatment approaches.
Strengths
- 1Large number of participants (1,455) from multiple studies
- 2Robust analysis including different types of acupuncture
- 3Evidence of efficacy both as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy
- 4Low heterogeneity in NIH-CPSI results
Limitations
- 1Some types of acupuncture represented by only one study
- 2Significant heterogeneity in VAS/NRS studies
- 3Most studies with some concerns about bias
- 4Difficulty of blinding in acupuncture studies
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Chronic pelvic pain is one of the conditions that most challenges clinical reasoning in pain practice: multifactorial etiology, partial responses to conventional pharmacotherapy, and patients often exhausted of options after years of seeking care. By bringing together 1,455 participants with diverse etiologies — endometriosis, chronic prostatitis, inflammatory pelvic pain, pregnancy-related pain — this meta-analysis confirms that acupuncture has measurable analgesic efficacy both as monotherapy and as an adjunct, considerably broadening management possibilities. A reduction of -1.87 points on the VAS/NRS and -2.10 points on the NIH-CPSI may seem modest in absolute terms, but in populations with refractory chronic pain it represents meaningful functional impact. The finding of efficacy as monotherapy is especially useful for patients with polypharmacy, NSAID intolerance, or already exhausted surgical options — situations common in our routine.
▸ Notable Findings
The most clinically relevant finding of this meta-analysis is the consistency of the analgesic effect across distinct modalities: electroacupuncture, manual acupuncture, moxibustion, abdominal acupuncture, and auricular acupuncture — all surpassing controls with robust statistical significance (p < 0.00001), both as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy. The only exception was laser acupuncture, a finding that deserves clinical attention because it suggests that the relevant mechanism of action may depend on mechanical or electrical stimulation of the acupoint, not simply the anatomic location. Another noteworthy finding is the low heterogeneity in NIH-CPSI results, which lends greater reliability to the effect estimate on this specific scale. The inclusion of men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome/chronic prostatitis is an important differentiator — a male population historically underrepresented in acupuncture trials for pelvic pain.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice, patients with chronic pelvic pain reach the pain clinic after multiple consultations with gynecologists, urologists, and colorectal surgeons, often without a definitive structural diagnosis. In these cases, I usually introduce acupuncture in the first weeks of the treatment plan, combined with pelvic-floor physical therapy and, when indicated, low-dose amitriptyline. I have observed perceptible clinical response — reported by the patient as reduced intensity or frequency of flares — around the third or fourth electroacupuncture session. For maintenance, I typically work with cycles of eight to twelve sessions, with reassessment after each cycle. The profile that responds best, in my observation over years, is the patient with a predominant functional component and no active ongoing structural lesion. The finding that laser acupuncture did not demonstrate efficacy reinforces what I had already observed empirically: mechanical stimulation of the acupoint appears essential for the neuromodulatory effect we seek.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Healthcare · 2023
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060830
Access original articleThis study underpins the editorial content of the site.
Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.
Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories