Acupuncture for symptoms in menopause transition: a randomized controlled trial
Liu et al. · American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2018
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy of electroacupuncture in relieving symptoms in women during the menopausal transition
WHO
360 women aged 40-55 years in menopausal transition with symptoms such as hot flashes, sweating, and sleep disturbances
DURATION
8 weeks of treatment with 24 weeks of follow-up
POINTS
CV-4, ST-25 bilateral, EX-CA1 bilateral, SP-6 bilateral with electroacupuncture at 10/50 Hz
🔬 Study Design
Electroacupuncture
n=180
Real acupuncture at traditional points with electrical stimulation
Sham
n=180
Blunted needles at non-points without penetration or stimulation
📊 Results in numbers
MRS reduction at 8 weeks (EA vs Sham)
Between-group MRS difference
24h hot flash reduction (EA vs Sham)
MENQOL quality-of-life improvement
Treatment-related adverse events
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) - Reduction at 8 weeks
MENQOL Quality of Life - Improvement at 8 weeks
This study investigated whether electroacupuncture can help women during the menopausal transition (the period before menopause). Although there were small improvements in symptoms, the difference compared with sham treatment was not large enough to be considered clinically significant for symptoms such as hot flashes. However, there was a more pronounced improvement in overall quality of life.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This multicenter randomized controlled trial investigated the efficacy of electroacupuncture versus sham electroacupuncture in the treatment of symptoms during the menopausal transition. Conducted at 12 hospitals in mainland China, the study enrolled 360 women aged 40-55 years experiencing symptoms such as hot flashes, sweating, sleep disturbances, anxiety, and vaginal dryness during the menopausal transition. Participants were randomized to receive real or sham electroacupuncture, with 24 sessions over 8 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of follow-up. The electroacupuncture group received treatment at points CV-4, ST-25 bilateral, EX-CA1 bilateral, and SP-6 bilateral, with electrical stimulation at 10/50 Hz for 30 minutes.
The sham group received blunted needles at non-points, without skin penetration or electrical stimulation. The primary outcome was the change in the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) at week 8. The results showed that both groups demonstrated improvement in menopausal symptoms. At week 8, the electroacupuncture group had a 6.3-point reduction on the MRS, while the sham group had a 4.5-point reduction, resulting in a between-group difference of only 1.8 points.
Although this difference was statistically significant, it was well below the minimal clinically important difference of 5 points. For hot flashes, measured by the 24-hour score, the electroacupuncture group showed a reduction of 3.6 points compared with 2.5 points in the sham group, a difference of 1.2 points that was also below the clinical significance threshold. Notably, for quality of life measured by the MENQOL questionnaire, the between-group differences were 5.7 points at week 8, 7.1 at week 20, and 8.4 at week 32, all exceeding the clinically important difference of 4 points. This suggests that, although electroacupuncture may not significantly relieve specific menopausal symptoms, it may have a positive impact on overall quality of life.
The effects of both treatments appeared to persist throughout the follow-up period, with some measures showing continued improvement. There were no significant between-group differences in reproductive hormone levels, except for the FSH/LH ratio. The study was well conducted with good treatment adherence and a low dropout rate. Blinding was effective, with participants in both groups equally unable to distinguish between real and sham treatment.
Limitations include relatively mild baseline symptoms, an ethnically homogeneous (Chinese) population, and the use of the MRS as the primary outcome rather than hot flash frequency. The study concludes that 8 weeks of electroacupuncture does not appear to relieve menopausal symptoms in a clinically significant manner in women during the menopausal transition, although it may improve quality of life.
Strengths
- 1Rigorous multicenter design with 360 participants
- 2Low dropout rate (3.6%)
- 3Effective blinding of the sham group
- 4Prolonged 24-week follow-up
- 5Well-conducted intention-to-treat analysis
Limitations
- 1Relatively mild baseline symptoms
- 2Ethnically homogeneous (Chinese) population
- 3Lack of assessment of participant expectations
- 4Possible placebo effect of the sham control
- 5Differences did not reach the minimal clinical significance threshold
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
The menopausal transition represents a real therapeutic challenge: women between 40 and 55 years of age with hot flashes, sleep disturbances, and anxiety who frequently refuse or have contraindications to hormone therapy. This multicenter trial of 360 participants across 12 hospitals offers an honest portrait of what electroacupuncture delivers in this setting. The 1.8-point difference on the MRS did not reach the minimal clinical significance threshold, but the 5.7- to 8.4-point improvement on the MENQOL — consistently above the 4-point threshold — positions electroacupuncture as a legitimate tool for the patient's overall quality of life, not necessarily for the isolated count of hot flashes. Clinically, this guides the indication discussion: when the patient reports broad functional impairment, and not only frequency of hot flashes, electroacupuncture has a stronger justification within an integrated plan.
▸ Notable Findings
The most substantive finding of this work is not the primary outcome but the dissociation between focal symptom and quality of life. The reduction in 24-hour hot flashes (3.6 versus 2.5) fell short of the clinical threshold, but the impact on the MENQOL grew progressively over follow-up — from 5.7 points at week 8 to 8.4 at week 32 — suggesting that the benefits of electroacupuncture mature after the active treatment period ends. This delayed-response pattern is biologically plausible: neuroendocrine modulation via the hypothalamic-pituitary axis has inertia. The reduction in the FSH/LH ratio as the only hormonal marker with a between-group difference is a modest but coherent signal supporting the hypothesis that acupuncture influences autonomic tone and neuroendocrine feedback. The effective blinding — participants unable to distinguish real from sham — confers methodologic rigor rarely seen in studies in this field.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice with patients in the menopausal transition, the pattern I observe is precisely what this work partially captures: focal symptomatic response tends to be modest in the first weeks, but patients report improvement in sleep, mood, and energy already during the initial sessions — frequently from the third or fourth session onward. I typically work with protocols of 12 to 16 sessions in the active phase, with biweekly maintenance for an additional three to four months, particularly when there is associated insomnia. I combine electroacupuncture with sleep hygiene counseling and, when there is a musculoskeletal component, with supervised exercise. I do not indicate isolated acupuncture when hot flashes are disabling — in those cases, referral for hormonal evaluation is the priority and acupuncture comes in as adjunctive care. The patient profile that responds best, in my experience, is the one with moderate vasomotor symptoms associated with anxiety and insomnia, exactly the constellation in which the MENQOL captures more than the simple count of hot flashes.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.019
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories