Skip to content

Management of auricular transcutaneous neuromodulation and electro-acupuncture of the vagus nerve for chronic migraine: a systematic review

Fernández-Hernando et al. · Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2023

📊Systematic Review👥n=333 participants⚖️Low-Quality Evidence
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (at-VNS) and auricular electroacupuncture for chronic migraine

👥

WHO

333 adults with chronic migraine (mean age: 34.8 years, 41.7% women)

⏱️

DURATION

Studies ranged from single sessions to 12 weeks of treatment

📍

POINTS

Auricular concha (cymba and cavum), TE-19, ST-16, CO11, CO14, GB-8

🔬 Study Design

333participants
randomization

at-VNS/Electroacupuncture

n=171

Auricular vagus nerve stimulation or electroacupuncture

Control/Sham

n=162

Sham stimulation or alternate location

⏱️ Duration: 8 minutes to 12 weeks

📊 Results in numbers

7.3 ± 0.8 points

Methodological quality (PEDro)

0%

Adverse effects

6 of 9

Studies with fMRI

0%

Oxford evidence level 1-2

Percentage highlights

7%
Adverse effects
77.8%
Oxford evidence level 1-2

📊 Outcome Comparison

PEDro Methodological Quality

4 high-quality studies
6
5 low-quality studies
3
💬 What does this mean for you?

This review analyzed alternative treatments for chronic migraine using electrical stimulation on the ear. The results suggest these treatments may have some benefit in reducing the frequency and intensity of attacks, with few side effects. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This systematic review study published in 2023 investigated the efficacy of auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (at-VNS) and auricular electroacupuncture in the treatment of chronic migraine. Migraine is a neurologic condition that affects more than 1 billion people worldwide, causing intense pain, nausea, vomiting, and sensitivity to light and sound, representing the second most frequent cause of neurologic disability globally. The investigators conducted a systematic search across six databases through June 2022, initially identifying 1,117 publications. After a rigorous selection process based on specific criteria, nine randomized clinical studies were included in the final analysis, totaling 333 participants with a mean age of 34.8 years, of whom 41.7% were women.

The mean duration of migraine symptoms was 14.6 years, with a mean frequency of 10.8 attacks per month. The studies investigated different stimulation protocols, varying in frequency (1 to 25 Hz), session duration (8 minutes to 4 hours daily), and total number of treatments (single session to 12 weeks). The most commonly used application points were the auricular concha (cymba and cavum), in addition to specific points such as TE-19, ST-16, CO11, CO14, and GB-8. Methodological quality assessment using the PEDro scale revealed a mean score of 7.3 ± 0.8 points, with four studies achieving high methodological quality (≥5 points).

Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB-2 tool, identifying only two studies with low risk. The main outcomes measured included pain intensity through the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), frequency and duration of migraine attacks, migraine-specific quality of life questionnaires (MSQ), depression (SDS) and anxiety (SAS) scales, and disability assessment (MIDAS) and headache impact (HIT-6). Six studies used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate changes in brain connectivity. The results suggest low-quality evidence for some positive effects of at-VNS at 1 Hz frequency compared with the control group post-treatment.

Specifically, there was a significant reduction in the frequency of migraine days and number of attacks in some studies. Neuroimaging analysis revealed alterations in brain areas related to pain processing, including the anterior cingulate cortex, periaqueductal gray, locus coeruleus, nucleus tractus solitarius, and frontal cortex. These neuroimaging findings provided evidence of the mechanism of action of auricular vagal stimulation, demonstrating connectivity between the peripheral branches of the vagus nerve and upper brainstem structures involved in pain modulation. Treatment safety was satisfactory, with only 7% of patients reporting adverse effects in one of the studies, leading to treatment discontinuation.

The remaining studies did not report significant adverse events. Limitations included heterogeneity in stimulation protocols, variability in follow-up periods, small sample size of individual studies, and risk of methodological bias in several studies. The inconsistency in stimulation parameters (frequency, intensity, duration) hindered direct comparison between studies and made it impossible to perform a meta-analysis. The clinical implications suggest that at-VNS and auricular electroacupuncture may represent safe and potentially effective therapeutic alternatives for patients with chronic migraine, especially considering the limitations and adverse effects of conventional pharmacologic treatments.

The non-invasive nature, low cost, and ease of application make these treatments attractive in clinical practice. However, the authors emphasize the need for future studies with greater methodological rigor, standardized protocols, and larger samples to establish definitive conclusions about the efficacy of these treatments in chronic migraine.

Strengths

  • 1First study to specifically focus on auricular stimulation for chronic migraine
  • 2Inclusion of functional neuroimaging data
  • 3Rigorous methodological quality assessment
  • 4Comprehensive safety analysis
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Heterogeneity in stimulation protocols
  • 2Variable methodological quality of studies
  • 3Inability to perform meta-analysis
  • 4Small samples in individual studies
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Chronic migraine represents one of the greatest challenges in pain medicine: patients with 14.6 years of history and more than ten monthly attacks on average arrive at the clinic exhausted from pharmacologic cycles, often with overuse of analgesics and severely compromised quality of life. In this context, auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and auricular electroacupuncture gain relevance as non-invasive adjuvant strategies, low-cost and with a favorable safety profile — only 7% adverse effects across the entire sample of 333 participants. For the physiatrist working in a pain service, this translates into a viable option for patients who do not tolerate conventional pharmacologic prophylaxis, who are pregnant, or who present cardiovascular contraindications to triptans. Localization at the auricular concha, with direct access to the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, aligns with coherent neurophysiologic reasoning measurable by functional neuroimaging, which distinguishes this approach from purely empirical interventions.

Notable Findings

The most clinically relevant data from this review are not in pain outcomes alone, but in the convergence between neuroimaging findings and observed clinical effects: six of the nine studies used fMRI and identified alterations in structures directly involved in descending pain modulation — anterior cingulate cortex, periaqueductal gray, locus coeruleus, and nucleus tractus solitarius. This provides a neurobiologic substrate for the clinical effect, distancing the discussion from the realm of belief and bringing it closer to pain neurophysiology. The 1 Hz frequency showed greater consistency of results compared with the control group, suggesting that slower stimulation parameters may be preferable in modulating the vagal system for migraine. The mean methodological quality of 7.3 points on the PEDro scale, with 77.8% of studies classified as Oxford level 1-2 evidence, also gives this review sufficient weight to support initial therapeutic decisions.

From My Experience

In my practice in the pain clinic, I have incorporated auricular electroacupuncture as a component of the multimodal program for patients with refractory chronic migraine, generally combined with pericranial blocks and a behavioral approach. I usually observe a subjective reduction in attack frequency starting from the third or fourth weekly session, with perceptible stabilization between the eighth and twelfth session — which aligns with the follow-up interval of the studies in this review. Patients with a prominent anxiety component and high scores on scales such as SDS and SAS tend to respond better, probably through the vagal pathway of autonomic nervous system modulation. I avoid indicating this approach in isolation in patients with frequent migraine with aura and high white-matter lesion burden without prior neurologic evaluation. Combination with central neuromodulation techniques, such as supraorbital TENS, has been promising in some profiles. The finding that the auricular concha — cymba and cavum — is the most studied target reinforces what we routinely use, and makes me comfortable maintaining this protocol while the literature matures.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2023

DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1151892

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.