Multimodal and Data-Driven Approaches in Acupuncture Research: Methods, Applications, and Challenges
Nie et al. · Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine · 2026
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
Review data-driven approaches in acupuncture research, including artificial intelligence, causal analysis, and integrative methods
WHO
Researchers, clinicians, and technology developers in acupuncture
DURATION
Literature review through December 2025
POINTS
ST-36 (Zusanli) widely studied with deep learning methods
🔬 Study Design
Narrative review
n=0
Analysis of the literature on data-driven methods
📊 Results in numbers
Prediction accuracy with SVM
CNN classification accuracy
Improvement with XGBoost vs. other algorithms
Dimensional reduction with VAE
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Predictive accuracy by method
This study shows how modern technology can make acupuncture more precise. Using artificial intelligence, researchers can better predict which patients will benefit from treatment and understand how acupuncture works in the body, enabling more personalized care.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This comprehensive review examines the digital revolution in acupuncture research, marking a fundamental transition from traditional hypothesis-driven methods to data-driven approaches. The authors present a structured framework that categorizes acupuncture data into three main components: intervention data (stimulation parameters, point selection), response data (clinical outcomes, multimodal biomarkers), and contextual data (traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis, patient characteristics). Causal analysis emerged as an essential tool for overcoming the limitations of conventional statistical methods. Mixed-effects models demonstrated value in multicenter studies, controlling between-center variability and repeated measures.
Bayesian methods proved superior in small samples with complex outcomes, while causal inference techniques such as propensity score matching and difference-in-differences enabled more rigorous analyses of observational and real-world data. The target trial emulation framework represents an important methodological advance for studies with electronic health records. Artificial intelligence transformed the ability to analyze heterogeneous and multidimensional data. Supervised machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVMs), LASSO, and tree-based methods, demonstrated accuracy of 77-88% in predicting treatment response.
Deep learning significantly expanded the processing of unstructured data: convolutional neural networks (CNNs) analyzed neuroimaging and tongue/pulse diagnostic images, while recurrent networks (RNNs) and transformers modeled temporal signals such as EEG and needle manipulation. Variational autoencoders revealed low-dimensional neural subspaces associated with acupuncture, suggesting that the technique reorganizes the dynamic landscape of cortical activity. Text analysis, including natural language processing and large language models (LLMs), enabled extraction of structured knowledge from classical texts and contemporary records. Bibliometric tools mapped the evolution of the field, identifying emerging areas such as neurological rehabilitation.
Integrative analyses combined multi-omics data, multimodal neuroimaging, and physiological signal fusion, providing a systemic understanding of mechanisms of action. Studies revealed modulation of metabolic pathways, neural connectivity, and central-peripheral coupling, elucidating molecular and neurophysiological bases of therapeutic effects. Practical applications span four main domains: efficacy assessment using robust causal models, efficacy prediction through ML algorithms, mechanistic investigation via neuroimaging analysis and omics data, and clinical decision support through objective diagnosis and AI-assisted prescription. Studies demonstrated that routine clinical characteristics can predict responders with accuracy above 77%, while neuroimaging biomarkers reached 85% accuracy.
Mechanistic analyses revealed that different manipulation techniques produce distinct patterns of cortical activation and reorganization of neural networks. Clinical support systems integrated objective imaging diagnosis, automated point localization, and manipulation quantification, facilitating a transition beyond dependence on subjective experience. Despite the promising advances, significant limitations persist. The lack of data standardization represents a fundamental obstacle, with substantial heterogeneity in collection protocols and representation of contextual data.
Many models remain exploratory, with limited external validation and restricted interpretability. Methodological complexity requires multidisciplinary expertise, limiting practical implementation. Issues of data quality, model generalization, and clinical translation have not yet been adequately resolved. The implications for the future of acupuncture research are transformative.
These methods facilitate a shift from population-level average effects to individualized strategies, allowing analysis of treatment heterogeneity and underlying mechanisms. The integration of multimodal data with sophisticated algorithms promises precision medicine in acupuncture, where therapeutic decisions are informed by individual profiles of biomarkers, clinical characteristics, and contextual factors. The development of standardized pipelines linking data acquisition, analytical validation, and clinical application represents a crucial priority for translating these methodological advances into tangible benefits for patients.
Strengths
- 1Comprehensive framework for categorizing multimodal data
- 2Systematic review of state-of-the-art methods
- 3Integration of artificial intelligence with traditional medicine
- 4Clear identification of practical applications
Limitations
- 1Lack of data standardization across studies
- 2Limited external validation of models
- 3Restricted interpretability of complex algorithms
- 4Need for multidisciplinary expertise
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
The transition from hypothesis-driven approaches to data-driven methods represents a paradigm shift that is directly relevant to the clinician dealing with musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation. The ability to predict treatment responders with accuracy above 77% using routine clinical characteristics — data we already collect on history and physical examination — has immediate practical implication: it allows prioritization of resources in a high-demand service and justification of the therapeutic sequence to the patient and to the multidisciplinary team. In rehabilitation contexts such as post-stroke neurological recovery or refractory chronic pain, where response heterogeneity is considerable, decision-support tools based on individual biomarker profiles and contextual characteristics may redefine the indication process. The target trial emulation framework applied to electronic health records also opens a promising avenue for generating real-world evidence without relying exclusively on controlled trials, historically difficult to conduct in acupuncture due to issues of blinding and intervention standardization.
▸ Notable Findings
The finding that variational autoencoders revealed low-dimensional neural subspaces associated with acupuncture — suggesting reorganization of the dynamic landscape of cortical activity — is the most thought-provoking of this review from a neurophysiological standpoint. It dialogues with what we know about neuroplasticity induced by needling and offers mechanistic substrate for analgesic effects persisting beyond the session. Equally relevant is the demonstration that different manipulation techniques produce distinct patterns of cortical activation: this empirically validates the importance of the executed technique, not just the location of the point. CNNs reaching 85% accuracy in neuroimaging and SVM algorithms with 77-85% accuracy in response prediction indicate that precision medicine in acupuncture is no longer a theoretical concept. The ability to extract structured knowledge from clinical records via natural language processing also deserves attention, as it enables mining of large clinical databases that would otherwise remain underused.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, the greatest difficulty is not knowing whether acupuncture works — that question is fairly well established for chronic low back pain, cervicalgia, and myofascial trigger-point syndrome — but rather anticipating who will respond and how quickly. I typically observe measurable functional response between the third and fifth session in good responders; when there is no signal at all after six sessions with an appropriate protocol, I reconsider the diagnostic hypothesis before persisting. What this work points out is that this empirical clinical judgment may soon be supported by algorithms trained with multimodal profiles. I have routinely combined acupuncture with supervised therapeutic exercise and, when indicated, with neuromodulation by radiofrequency or diagnostic block, with results superior to monotherapy. The profile that responds best in my experience is the patient with predominantly functional components, without established severe central sensitization, and with good adherence to the rehabilitation program — exactly the type of heterogeneity that these predictive models promise to quantify objectively.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine · 2026
DOI: 10.1097/HM9.0000000000000198
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories