The Brain Circuitry Mediating Antipruritic Effects of Acupuncture

Napadow et al. · Cerebral Cortex · 2014

🔄Crossover RCT with neuroimaging👥n=14 participants🧠High impact - neuroimaging

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
2/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the brain mechanisms by which acupuncture reduces itch in patients with atopic dermatitis

👥

WHO

14 patients with atopic dermatitis and confirmed allergic sensitivity

⏱️

DURATION

4 neuroimaging sessions (1 per week)

📍

POINTS

LI-11 (Quchi) and HT-3 (Shaohai), near the right elbow

🔬 Study Design

14participants
randomization

Electroacupuncture

n=14

True points with 100 Hz electrostimulation

Placebo acupuncture

n=14

Sham points without skin penetration

Antihistamine

n=14

Oral levocetirizine 5 mg

Drug placebo

n=14

Similar-tasting placebo solution

⏱️ Duration: 4 weeks (1 session per week)

📊 Results in numbers

-21.6 points

Itch reduction (electroacupuncture)

Significant

Reduction in brain activation - insula

Significant

Reduction in brain activation - putamen

No difference

Antihistamine efficacy

📊 Outcome Comparison

Reduction in itch intensity (0-100 scale)

Electroacupuncture
21.6
Placebo acupuncture
-1.8
Antihistamine
-2.8
Drug placebo
3.3
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that acupuncture with electrical stimulation can significantly reduce itch in people with atopic dermatitis by altering activity in specific areas of the brain. Interestingly, the antihistamine was not effective in this model, suggesting that acupuncture acts through mechanisms different from those of traditional medications.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This innovative study used functional MRI to investigate how acupuncture reduces itch in patients with atopic dermatitis, a chronic condition that significantly affects quality of life. The researchers developed a sophisticated experimental model in which itch was induced through allergens applied to the skin, and its intensity was modulated by temperature changes, allowing detailed analysis of brain responses at different phases of the itch sensation. Fourteen patients with atopic dermatitis participated in a crossover study in which each experienced four different interventions: real electroacupuncture, placebo acupuncture (no skin penetration), oral antihistamine (levocetirizine), and drug placebo. Electroacupuncture was applied to specific points near the right elbow (LI-11 and HT-3) with 100 Hz electrical stimulation, following protocols validated in previous studies.

The sessions were separated by at least one week to avoid residual effects. The results revealed that itch perception involves different brain circuits depending on the phase of the sensation. During the initial rising phase of itch, areas related to salience and motivation were activated, including the anterior insula and the striatum (specifically the putamen). When itch reached its maximum peak, robust activation was observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and premotor areas, likely reflecting the cognitive control needed to suppress the urge to scratch.

Electroacupuncture demonstrated significant efficacy, reducing itch intensity by an average of 21.6 points on a 0-100 scale. This improvement was accompanied by a reduction in brain activation in several key regions: anterior insula, putamen, globus pallidus, and prefrontal cortex. Particularly important was the finding that the reduction in putamen activation correlated directly with the decrease in itch, suggesting that this brain region, involved in motivational processing and habitual behaviors, plays a central role in the antipruritic effects of acupuncture. Surprisingly, the antihistamine levocetirizine showed no efficacy in this experimental model, altering neither itch intensity nor brain activation.

This finding contrasts with previous studies and suggests that histamine may not be the primary mediator of itch in atopic dermatitis, or that central mechanisms predominate over peripheral ones in this condition. Placebo acupuncture also showed no effects, confirming the specificity of the real intervention. The study offers valuable insights into the neurobiological mechanisms of itch and its relief through acupuncture. The identification of the putamen as a key region suggests that acupuncture may function as a counterstimulus, modulating the brain circuits that process the urge to scratch.

This finding has important implications for the development of new therapies, especially considering that conventional treatments are often inadequate for chronic itch. Limitations include the relatively small sample size and the fact that the study evaluated only acute effects, not the benefits of a prolonged course of acupuncture treatment. In addition, the experimental model may not fully reflect the complexity of chronic itch in the real clinical setting. Despite these limitations, this work represents a significant advance in understanding the brain mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of acupuncture.

Strengths

  • 1First study to use neuroimaging to investigate antipruritic mechanisms of acupuncture
  • 2Robust crossover design with multiple controls
  • 3Well-validated experimental model with temperature control
  • 4Sophisticated analysis separating different phases of itch
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Small sample (n=14)
  • 2Evaluation of acute effects only, not chronic
  • 3Partially blinded study (investigator was not blinded)
  • 4Experimental model may not reflect real clinical itch
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Chronic pruritus in atopic dermatitis remains one of the most refractory symptoms in dermatologic and allergy practice, and this work by Napadow and colleagues arrives with a concrete contribution: electroacupuncture acts on central brain circuits — specifically the anterior insula and the putamen — and not on the same mechanisms as antihistamines. This has direct implications in the clinic. A patient already using regular antihistamines without satisfactory itch relief is not in total therapeutic failure; they are responding to a mediator that may not be predominantly histaminergic. In these cases, electroacupuncture emerges as a complementary option with a distinct and documented mechanism. The population that benefits most is precisely that with moderate-to-intense itch, refractory to conventional monotherapy, where central modulation is clinically desirable and adherence to weekly sessions is feasible.

Notable Findings

The dissociation between phases of itch — rising versus maximum peak — revealing distinct brain circuits is a finding of rare neurobiological elegance in acupuncture studies. The rising phase recruits regions of salience and motivation, while the peak involves the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in an apparent effort to suppress the urge to scratch. Electroacupuncture attenuated both components, with an average reduction of 21.6 points in itch intensity and simultaneous modulation of the insula, putamen, and globus pallidus. The direct correlation between reduced putamen activation and clinical relief is particularly intriguing, as it positions the ventral striatum — a central structure in habitual and motivational behaviors — as a functional target of the intervention. The absence of response to levocetirizine in this model, in turn, suggests that in established atopic dermatitis, histamine yields the leading role to central mediators, shifting the therapeutic focus to central modulation strategies such as acupuncture.

From My Experience

At the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, we have been treating patients with chronic pruritus associated with dermatologic and neuropathic conditions, and the pattern I have observed for decades is consistent with what this work demonstrates: response to electroacupuncture usually appears after the second or third session, with noticeable relief of nocturnal itch — which is what most compromises sleep and quality of life. In general, I work with cycles of eight to ten weekly sessions before evaluating maintenance, reducing to biweekly when there is a sustained response. I typically combine LI-11 with SP-10 in these cases, and the 100 Hz frequency as used in the study is the one I prefer for acute analgesic and antipruritic effects. Patients with intense dermographism or previous use of immunosuppressants respond more heterogeneously, requiring protocol adjustments. When itch has a strong anxious component or associated insomnia, the combination with points of the heart meridian potentiates the result in a way I have observed clinically for many years.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Cerebral Cortex · 2014

DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs363

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.