Outpatient acupuncture effects on patient self-reported symptoms in oncology care: a retrospective analysis
Lopez et al. · Journal of Cancer · 2018
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effects of acupuncture on self-reported symptoms in oncology patients at an outpatient integrative medicine center
WHO
375 patients with cancer (68% women, mean age 55 years), mainly with breast cancer (33%) and thoracic/head and neck cancer (26%)
DURATION
Data collected during 2016, with a mean of 4.6 treatments per patient
POINTS
Individualized treatments by licensed acupuncturists using 32-40 gauge needles for 20-30 minutes
🔬 Study Design
Patients receiving acupuncture
n=375
Personalized outpatient acupuncture
📊 Results in numbers
Improvement in hot flashes
Reduction in fatigue
Improvement in tingling
Reduction in nausea
Patients with follow-up
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Global Distress Score (0-90)
Physical Distress (0-60)
This study showed that acupuncture can provide significant relief for several cancer-related symptoms. Patients reported immediate improvements in symptoms such as hot flashes, fatigue, tingling, and nausea after a single acupuncture session.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This retrospective study analyzed the effects of outpatient acupuncture on oncology patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center during 2016. The research examined 375 unique patients who received acupuncture as part of standard care at an integrative medicine center, representing a total of 1,728 treatments. The study population had a mean age of 55.6 years; 68.3% were women and 73.9% were white/Caucasian. The most common cancer types were breast (32.8%) and thoracic/head and neck (25.9%).
The investigators used a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) to evaluate 16 different symptoms on a 0-10 scale, administered before and after each acupuncture session. Treatments were performed by licensed and experienced acupuncturists using sterile stainless steel needles inserted at specific points for 20-30 minutes. The treatment protocol was individualized according to the acupuncturist's professional judgment, typically recommending two sessions weekly for 3-4 weeks. Results showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in all symptoms and subscales after a single acupuncture treatment.
The symptoms with the largest mean reduction were hot flashes (-1.93), fatigue (-1.72), tingling (-1.70), and nausea (-1.67). The global, physical, and psychological distress subscales also showed clinically significant improvements. In the longitudinal analysis, 73.3% of patients had at least one follow-up treatment, with a mean of 4.6 treatments per patient. Among patients who returned for follow-up within 30 days, statistically significant improvement was observed in all symptoms except appetite.
Spiritual pain showed both statistically and clinically significant improvement (-1.10 points). Clinical response rates exceeded 50% for symptoms such as spiritual pain (58.9%), dry mouth (57.8%), and nausea (57.3%). This study provides important real-world evidence on the effectiveness of acupuncture, complementing the findings of controlled clinical trials. The improvements observed were consistent with prior literature on acupuncture in oncology, particularly for pain and nausea/vomiting.
The ability to collect patient-reported outcome data as part of standard care (>90% of encounters had pre-treatment data available) demonstrates the feasibility of integrating research into clinical practice. The results suggest that acupuncture may be a valuable tool for the nonpharmacologic management of cancer-related symptoms. Clinical implications include the potential to incorporate acupuncture as part of supportive care programs in oncology centers, especially given growing interest in nonpharmacologic approaches to symptom control. The study also provides useful information for the design of future clinical trials, including data on treatment frequency and patient response patterns.
Strengths
- 1Large sample of 375 patients
- 2Real-world data from a clinical setting
- 3Comprehensive assessment of 16 different symptoms
- 4Experienced and licensed acupuncturists
Limitations
- 1Absence of a control group
- 2Retrospective, single-center study
- 3Possible unmeasured confounding factors
- 4Lack of objective biological measures
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Integrative oncology now occupies a growing space within major cancer treatment centers, and this work from MD Anderson Cancer Center documents, with the rigor of real-world data, what we have already observed empirically in our practice: acupuncture provides measurable relief across a broad spectrum of symptoms in oncology patients. With 375 patients and 1,728 encounters analyzed, the analysis covers breast tumors — the most represented group, at 32.8% of the sample — as well as thoracic and head and neck malignancies. Direct clinical applicability lies in the possibility of incorporating acupuncture as a formal component of supportive care programs, particularly for patients on aromatase inhibitors, emetogenic chemotherapy, or undergoing treatments associated with peripheral neuropathy. The simultaneous improvement in 16 distinct symptoms, assessed by the modified ESAS, reinforces the argument that acupuncture acts on multiple symptomatic axes — physical, psychological, and existential — making it particularly valuable when the patient presents with a constellation of complaints that is difficult to address with pharmacologic monotherapy.
▸ Notable Findings
The magnitude of the reduction in hot flashes — the symptom with the greatest response, with a mean decrease of 1.93 points — deserves special attention, given that this symptom remains a therapeutic challenge in patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, in whom conventional hormone therapy is contraindicated. The improvement in fatigue (-1.72 points) and tingling (-1.70 points) reinforces the relevance of acupuncture in the context of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, one of the most limiting and hardest-to-manage adverse effects in oncology practice. The response in spiritual pain — a domain that rarely appears as a primary outcome in acupuncture trials — is also notable, with a clinical response rate of 58.9% and a 1.10-point reduction in longitudinal follow-up. Operational feasibility is itself a finding: more than 90% of encounters had pre-treatment data available, and 73.3% of patients returned for at least one follow-up session, with a mean of 4.6 sessions per patient, signaling acceptability and adherence consistent with what is expected of an integrative intervention at a tertiary center.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice with oncology patients at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, I have observed that the speed of response to acupuncture in this population tends to be faster than in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain — I often notice some relief after the first or second session, which is consistent with the single-session data reported in this work. For chemotherapy-related fatigue and nausea, I usually recommend sessions close to treatment cycles, which enhances antiemetic control and reduces the post-infusion fatigue peak. The pattern we have established is two weekly sessions in the first three to four weeks, then biweekly maintenance based on response — a structure very close to the protocol described by the authors. For taxane- or platinum-induced neuropathy, I add electroacupuncture at distal points on the limbs, with results that I consider superior to manual acupuncture alone in these cases. The patient profile that responds best, in my experience, is one with multiple concurrent symptoms and limited reserve for polypharmacy — precisely the patient this study, to a large extent, represents.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Journal of Cancer · 2018
DOI: 10.7150/jca.26527
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories