Skip to content

Acupuncture

Chon & Lee · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · 2013

📖Concise Clinical Review🌍34,000+ treatments analyzed🏥Mayo Clinic Publication

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Provide a comprehensive review of acupuncture for clinicians, including mechanisms, safety, and evidence

👥

WHO

Internal medicine physicians and primary care providers

⏱️

DURATION

Historical review of 4,000+ years of practice

📍

POINTS

General discussion of meridians and acupuncture points according to TCM theory

🔬 Study Design

34000participants
randomization

Safety study

n=34000

Acupuncture treatments in the United Kingdom

US population

n=3100000

Adults who received acupuncture in 2007

⏱️ Duration: Longitudinal historical review

📊 Results in numbers

3.1 million

Use by American adults

1 million

Growth 2002–2007

0–1.1 per 10,000

Rate of minor adverse events

0

Serious adverse events

📊 Outcome Comparison

Treatment safety

Serious adverse events
0
Minor events
37
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study from the prestigious Mayo Clinic offers a complete and reliable overview of acupuncture, showing that it is a safe and effective practice for various conditions. The article confirms that millions of Americans already safely use acupuncture and provides important information for those considering this treatment.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This review article from Mayo Clinic Proceedings offers a comprehensive analysis of acupuncture, a millennia-old technique that has gained growing acceptance in Western medicine. Authors Chon and Lee present a balanced and scientifically grounded view of this therapeutic modality, which today is part of complementary and integrative medicine.

Acupuncture is defined as a technique of inserting and manipulating fine needles at specific points of the body to achieve therapeutic purposes. Based on traditional Chinese medicine, it is grounded in the concept of Qi, the vital energy that flows through meridians in the human body. According to this philosophy, imbalance or interruption of Qi flow causes disease, and acupuncture aims to restore this balance.

Historically, the practice has existed for over 4,000 years in China, having first been described in the classic "The Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon" around 200 B.C. In the West, it gained prominence in 1971 when journalist James Reston reported his positive experience with acupuncture after an appendectomy in China. Since then, its use in the United States has grown significantly — 2007 data show that 3.1 million American adults received acupuncture, representing an increase of approximately 1 million people between 2002 and 2007.

Regarding mechanisms of action, several scientific theories attempt to explain how acupuncture works. Gate control theory suggests that needles stimulate inhibitory nerve fibers, reducing the transmission of painful signals to the brain. The endorphin model proposes that acupuncture stimulates the production of endorphins in the central nervous system, explaining its analgesic effects. More recent research indicates that acupuncture increases the availability of mu-opioid receptors in the central nervous system.

In addition, animal studies demonstrate that acupuncture modulates neurotransmitters such as serotonin, norepinephrine, and GABA, suggesting efficacy for depression, anxiety, and addictions.

The safety of acupuncture is well documented when practiced properly. Modern needles are disposable, sterile, and extremely thin — some thinner than a strand of hair. A British study analyzing more than 34,000 treatments found no serious adverse events, and the rate of minor events (nausea, fainting, emotional reactions) was only 0 to 1.1 per 10,000 treatments. The most common side effects include small bruises or tenderness at the insertion site.

The typical treatment involves an initial consultation with a questionnaire, interview, and focused physical examination, followed by establishment of a diagnosis and therapeutic plan. Surprisingly, most patients experience minimal or no discomfort during treatment. Sessions last from 30 minutes to one hour, with needles retained for 15–20 minutes. Stimulation can be performed manually, with heat (moxibustion), or with low-intensity electrical current.

Generally, 6 to 12 sessions are needed, with periodic maintenance treatments for long-term benefits.

Scientific evidence for acupuncture has strengthened in recent decades. In 1997, a consensus conference of the National Institutes of Health highlighted several medical conditions for which acupuncture is effective. In 2003, the World Health Organization identified 28 diseases or conditions for which acupuncture has demonstrated efficacy. The best-established indications include neurologic conditions (migraine, tension-type headache), musculoskeletal conditions (knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, low back and neck pain, postoperative pain), and gastrointestinal conditions (chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting).

Less conclusive but promising evidence exists for gynecologic/reproductive conditions (hot flashes, infertility), psychiatric/mood disorders (stress, anxiety, depression), and addictions. Other areas, such as ENT, respiratory, cardiovascular, and sleep problems, require more research.

In the United States, most treatments are provided by licensed non-physician acupuncturists, regulated by the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine. Increasingly, physicians are seeking formal training in medical acupuncture through the American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, especially valuable for complex cases that require integration with conventional therapies.

Regarding insurance coverage, Medicare currently does not cover acupuncture, although legislative acts have repeatedly been proposed to include it. Many private insurers offer partial or full coverage but with limits on the number of treatments.

The future of acupuncture looks promising, with growing acceptance both in the medical community and among the general public. Technological advances such as functional MRI are providing insights into the mechanisms of action of acupuncture. The challenge continues to be complete integration of this millennia-old modality into the Western medical paradigm, maintaining scientific rigor while respecting its philosophical traditions.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive review from a prestigious academic source
  • 2Analysis of a large safety database (34,000 treatments)
  • 3Balanced coverage of mechanisms, safety, and evidence
  • 4Practical guidance for clinicians and patients
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Narrative nature of the review without formal meta-analysis
  • 2Methodological heterogeneity of reviewed studies
  • 3Safety data primarily from a single British study
  • 4Need for more research in various clinical indications
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

A review published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings carries institutional weight that facilitates dialogue with skeptical colleagues and service managers. The article by Chon and Lee performs exactly this function: consolidating, in a high-visibility source, what the accumulated literature demonstrates about the indications, mechanisms, and safety of acupuncture. For the physician who treats patients with chronic pain, headache, osteoarthritis, oncologic nausea, or fibromyalgia, the text offers a reasonable clinical map — the indications with the most robust evidence largely coincide with the situations in which acupuncture is already part of multidisciplinary protocols at reference services. The safety profile documented in more than 34,000 treatments, with zero serious events and a minor event rate below 1.1 per ten thousand, is a concrete argument for expanding access within university hospitals and specialty clinics.

Notable Findings

From a mechanistic standpoint, the review clearly articulates three explanatory lines that converge: modulation of inhibitory fibers via the gate control theory, release of endogenous endorphins, and, most relevant for contemporary practice, increased availability of mu-opioid receptors in the central nervous system. This last finding is especially noteworthy in a scenario of growing restriction on the use of opioids — it suggests that acupuncture may potentiate endogenous analgesia by pathways that compete, at least partially, with the same receptors as exogenous opioids. The modulation of serotonin, norepinephrine, and GABA opens an interpretive window for the effects observed in anxiety and depression, conditions increasingly present as comorbidities in pain clinics. The growth in use in the United States — from 2.1 to 3.1 million adults between 2002 and 2007 — translates into real demand pressure that health systems need to absorb with adequate structure.

From My Experience

In my practice at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, the profile described in this review closely matches what I see daily. For chronic musculoskeletal pain and headache, I usually observe a perceptible response between the third and fifth session — patients who report absolutely nothing by the sixth rarely respond on the initial regimen and warrant reassessment of diagnosis and points. The usual cycle I practice is eight to ten sessions for the acute phase, followed by monthly or bimonthly maintenance according to stabilization. I systematically combine acupuncture with active physical therapy and, when appropriate, with pharmacological modulation — the combination is usually superior to any monotherapy. The profile that responds best, in my observation over decades, is the patient with moderate inflammatory pain, without severe established central hyperalgesia, and with good adherence to non-pharmacological treatment. I temporarily contraindicate it in patients with severe uncontrolled coagulopathy or profound immunosuppression. The convergence between the mechanisms described by Chon and Lee and what we observe clinically reinforces confidence in the biological rationale of the method.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Mayo Clinic Proceedings · 2013

DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.009

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.