Skip to content

Role of acupuncture in the management of diabetic painful neuropathy (DPN): a pilot RCT

Garrow et al. · Acupuncture in Medicine · 2014

🎯Single-blind RCT👥n=45🔬Pilot study

Evidence Level

MODERATE
65/ 100
Quality
3/5
Sample
2/5
Replication
2/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility of acupuncture in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy

👥

WHO

45 patients with diabetes and painful lower-extremity neuropathy

⏱️

DURATION

10 weeks of treatment with follow-up

📍

POINTS

LR-3, KI-3, SP-6, SP-10, and ST-36 (5 points per leg)

🔬 Study Design

45participants
randomization

Real acupuncture

n=24

Traditional acupuncture with penetrating needles

Sham acupuncture

n=21

Non-penetrating sham needles

⏱️ Duration: 10 weeks

📊 Results in numbers

15 points

Pain improvement (VAS)

2.5 points

Sleep improvement

5.2 mmHg

Blood pressure reduction

0.89 points

MYMOP improvement

📊 Outcome Comparison

VAS pain scale (0-100)

Real acupuncture
15
Sham
5

LANSS scale (0-24)

Real acupuncture
2.1
Sham
-1.1
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that acupuncture may be a safe and promising option for people with diabetes who experience foot and leg pain from neuropathy. Patients who received real acupuncture had improvements in pain, sleep, and quality of life compared with those who received sham treatment.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a debilitating complication of diabetes that affects up to one third of patients with type 2 diabetes, causing severe nocturnal pain, burning, and electric-shock sensations in the feet and legs. Current treatment is based mainly on medications such as tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants, but up to two thirds of patients experience significant side effects, and 15% stop treatment because of these adverse effects. This randomized controlled pilot study investigated whether acupuncture could be a viable and safe alternative for managing PDN. The researchers recruited 59 patients with diabetes and confirmed painful neuropathy from primary and secondary care centers.

Participants were randomized to receive 10 weekly sessions of real acupuncture (24 patients) or sham acupuncture with non-penetrating sham needles (21 patients). The protocol used five standardized acupuncture points in each leg (LR-3, KI-3, SP-6, SP-10, and ST-36), selected based on traditional Chinese medicine principles for diabetes and neuropathy. Three experienced acupuncturists performed the treatments, following rigorous protocols to ensure standardization. The study was carefully designed as single-blind, using validated sham devices to maintain patient blinding.

Primary outcomes were measured with validated scales, including LANSS for neuropathic symptoms, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the Sleep Problems Scale (SPS), and quality-of-life questionnaires. Forty-five patients completed the study (76% completion rate). The results showed promising improvements in the real acupuncture group compared with the sham group. On the VAS pain scale, the real acupuncture group had a mean reduction of 15 points versus only 5 points in the sham group.

Sleep quality improved significantly, with a 2.5-point reduction on the Sleep Problems Scale in the active group. The MYMOP questionnaire, which measures patient-centered outcomes, showed an improvement of 0.89 points in the real acupuncture group. An interesting finding was a 5.2 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure in the acupuncture group, suggesting additional cardiovascular benefits. Analysis of covariance revealed a moderate treatment effect favoring active acupuncture, with a 2.1-point improvement on the LANSS scale compared with sham.

Approximately 46% of patients in the active group had at least a 25% improvement in pain intensity, compared with only 13% in the sham group. The treatment was very well tolerated, with only three adverse events leading to study withdrawal, none directly related to acupuncture. There were no infections or significant complications. Post hoc analysis of blinding showed that 40% of the active group thought they had received sham treatment and 42% of the sham group thought they had received real acupuncture, indicating adequate blinding.

The clinical implications of this study are significant. It demonstrates that acupuncture can be readily integrated into the routine care of patients with diabetes in specialty clinics. The results suggest that acupuncture may provide symptomatic relief comparable to other treatments for chronic pain, with a safety profile superior to that of conventional medications. The improvement in sleep quality is particularly relevant, as sleep disturbances are common and debilitating in PDN.

The study also identified appropriate outcome measures for larger future studies. Limitations include the small sample size, which limited statistical power to detect significant differences in some measures. The dropout rate was higher in the sham group (47% versus 17%), which could introduce bias. The study was conducted at a single center with a predominantly White British population, limiting generalizability.

In addition, as a feasibility pilot study, it was not designed to be definitive about efficacy. This work establishes a solid foundation for larger definitive studies of acupuncture in PDN. The authors recommend that future research include larger samples, multiple centers, and cost-effectiveness measures. The study adds to the growing evidence that acupuncture may be a valuable therapeutic option for chronic pain conditions in diabetes, offering an alternative or complement to conventional pharmacological treatments.

Strengths

  • 1Use of a validated sham device ensuring adequate blinding
  • 2Standardized protocols with experienced acupuncturists
  • 3Multiple validated outcome measures
  • 4Low adverse event rate demonstrating safety
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Small sample size limiting statistical power
  • 2Single-center study with a homogeneous population
  • 3Higher dropout rate in the sham group
  • 4Pilot study not designed to determine definitive efficacy
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Painful diabetic neuropathy represents one of the greatest therapeutic challenges in pain and rehabilitation services. Tricyclics, gabapentinoids, and duloxetine form the pharmacological backbone, but the therapeutic window is narrow and the dropout rate from adverse effects is substantial — up to 15% of patients, according to the data in this work itself. This scenario creates a real demand for non-pharmacological alternatives that can be added to the existing armamentarium without adding side-effect burden. The findings of Garrow et al. are directly applicable to the patient with type 2 diabetes and established painful neuropathy, especially those with polypharmacy, renal impairment that limits doses, or intolerance to first-line agents. The integration of acupuncture into the multidisciplinary chronic pain protocol, already practiced in specialized centers, gains additional support from this controlled, blinded pilot.

Notable Findings

The 15-point reduction in VAS in the active group versus 5 points in the sham group translates into a clinically perceptible difference, especially considering that 46% of patients with real acupuncture achieved a minimum reduction of 25% in pain intensity — a proportion more than three times higher than in the control group (13%). The 2.5-point improvement on the Sleep Problems Scale deserves particular attention: nonrestorative sleep amplifies pain perception and worsens glycemic control, creating a well-documented vicious cycle. Breaking this cycle with a low-risk intervention is clinically relevant. The finding of a 5.2 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure was not a primary outcome, but it points to an autonomic response to acupuncture that makes neurophysiological sense in patients with concomitant autonomic neuropathy. The successful blinding — with similar correct-guess rates between groups — adds greater internal credibility to the results.

From My Experience

In my pain clinic practice, painful diabetic neuropathy is one of the indications in which I usually see a more gradual response to acupuncture compared, for example, to myofascial syndrome. I typically observe the first signal of improvement between the fourth and sixth session — rarely before that. The protocol of distal points in the lower extremities described by Garrow et al. is quite close to what we use, with LR-3 and ST-36 as frequent anchors. In my experience, combining acupuncture with supervised aerobic exercise and tight glycemic control consistently enhances the response; in isolation, none of these interventions is usually sufficient. I have observed that patients with better metabolic control — HbA1c below 8% — respond more rapidly. Conversely, in very advanced neuropathies with predominant sensory loss, the analgesic response is more modest, and I adjust the patient's expectations from the outset. For maintenance, monthly sessions for six to twelve months have been the practice in our service after the acute phase of ten to twelve weekly sessions.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Acupuncture in Medicine · 2014

DOI: 10.1136/acupmed-2013-010495

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.