Efficacy of acupuncture and laser acupuncture in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Di Francesco et al. · BMC Oral Health · 2024
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Evaluate the efficacy of needle acupuncture and laser acupuncture in the treatment of pain in temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
WHO
Adult patients with temporomandibular disorders of muscular or mixed origin
DURATION
Sessions ranging from 15-30 minutes, from 1 to 15 sessions per study
POINTS
Mainly ST-5, ST-6, ST-7, ST-8 in the craniocervical-mandibular region
🔬 Study Design
Needle Acupuncture
n=101
Traditional needle acupuncture for 15-30 min
Laser Acupuncture
n=47
Stimulation of points with low-level laser
Control/Placebo
n=54
Sham acupuncture, sham laser, or drug therapy
📊 Results in numbers
Acupuncture vs Placebo Efficacy
Laser Acupuncture vs Placebo Efficacy
Significant pain reduction
Improvement in mouth opening
📊 Outcome Comparison
Efficacy Rate (Odds Ratio)
This study analyzed 11 trials to determine whether traditional acupuncture and laser acupuncture help reduce pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The results show that both treatments are more effective than placebo, especially laser acupuncture, offering pain relief without significant side effects.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Temporomandibular disorders, known as TMDs, represent a complex set of conditions that affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the masticatory muscles, and adjacent tissues. This joint, located near the ear, is responsible for the movements of opening and closing the mouth, chewing, and speaking. When there are problems in this region, patients may experience facial pain, difficulty opening the mouth, clicking, or jaw locking. The pain may be of muscular, articular, or mixed origin, with 90% to 95% of cases presenting facial pain of muscular origin without identifiable structural causes.
Treatment traditionally involves conservative approaches such as occlusal splints, medications, physical therapy, and self-management techniques, but the search for effective therapeutic alternatives continues to be a priority in the medical field.
Acupuncture has gained increasing interest as a therapeutic option for pain management in various conditions, including TMDs. In parallel, laser acupuncture emerges as a modern alternative that uses low-level laser light to stimulate traditional acupuncture points, eliminating the need for needle insertion. This technique offers potential advantages by being noninvasive, painless, and inherently safer than traditional acupuncture. Despite the theoretical benefits, scientific evidence on the efficacy of these therapeutic modalities for TMDs remained fragmented and required systematic analysis to adequately guide clinical practice.
The objective of this research was to perform a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of the scientific literature on the use of acupuncture and laser acupuncture in the treatment of pain associated with temporomandibular disorders. The researchers conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, following rigorous methodologic criteria established by the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. The search was performed in three important electronic databases — PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS — covering publications through July 2023, with no language restrictions. Only randomized controlled trials that compared acupuncture or laser acupuncture with other treatments in patients with TMD were included.
Inclusion criteria specified studies with adult patients diagnosed with TMD, adequate description of the acupuncture techniques used, presence of control groups, and validated outcome measures such as pain scales and mouth opening. The methodologic quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool (RoB 2), and a meta-analysis was conducted to quantitatively investigate the efficacy of the interventions compared with placebo.
The analysis identified 11 randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria, involving participants with different types of TMD. Of the analyzed studies, seven investigated TMD of muscular origin, four addressed combined types (muscular and articular), and none focused exclusively on articular problems. Six studies tested traditional needle acupuncture, while three investigated laser acupuncture, comparing these interventions with control groups that received sham acupuncture, sham laser, drug therapy, or decompression splints. Session duration ranged between 15 and 30 minutes, with different treatment protocols.
The results demonstrated that acupuncture offers short-term benefits for reducing pain intensity in TMDs of muscular origin. The meta-analysis revealed that both the acupuncture group and the laser acupuncture group showed significantly higher efficacy rates than the placebo group. In particular, laser acupuncture showed high efficacy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders, with some studies demonstrating statistically significant differences on the visual analog pain scale. In addition to pain reduction, some studies reported improvements in mouth opening and masticatory function in patients with TMD of muscular origin.
The clinical implications of these findings are relevant for both patients and health care professionals dealing with TMDs. For patients, the results suggest that acupuncture and especially laser acupuncture may represent valid therapeutic options, particularly when conventional conservative methods do not provide adequate relief. Laser acupuncture, in particular, offers practical advantages by being noninvasive, painless, and free of significant side effects — aspects especially important for patients who fear needles or have contraindications to other treatments. For professionals, these data provide scientific evidence that can guide therapeutic decisions and the incorporation of these modalities into multidisciplinary treatment protocols.
The demonstrated efficacy, especially for TMDs of muscular origin, suggests that these therapies can be integrated as part of an initial conservative approach, potentially reducing the need for more invasive interventions or prolonged use of medications.
However, the study has important limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. The methodologic quality of the included studies was variable, with only four of the 11 trials presenting low risk of bias. Many studies had small samples, which can limit generalization of the findings. In addition, there was heterogeneity in the diagnostic methods used, the pain assessment scales, and the treatment protocols, making direct comparisons among studies difficult.
Most research evaluated only short-term effects, with few studies investigating long-term benefits. The authors acknowledge that evidence for acupuncture as a symptomatic treatment of TMD remains limited and emphasize the need for more rigorous studies, with larger samples and prolonged follow-up, to definitively establish the therapeutic value of these interventions. Despite these limitations, the results provide encouraging evidence, particularly for laser acupuncture, pointing to a promising direction in research and treatment of temporomandibular disorders, with the potential to significantly improve the quality of life of patients affected by these painful conditions.
Strengths
- 1Meta-analysis with low heterogeneity among studies
- 2Inclusion of two acupuncture modalities (needle and laser)
- 3Rigorous comparison with placebo groups
- 4Adherence to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews
Limitations
- 1Small samples in most included studies
- 2Only 4 of 11 studies presented low risk of bias
- 3Heterogeneity in TMD diagnostic criteria
- 4Lack of long-term efficacy data
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Temporomandibular dysfunction of muscular origin represents one of the most frequent diagnoses in orofacial pain and rehabilitation clinics, and the therapeutic gap for patients refractory to conventional conservative approaches is real. By demonstrating an OR of 6.20 for needle acupuncture and an OR of 14.08 for laser acupuncture versus placebo, this meta-analysis consolidates quantitative evidence that justifies incorporating these modalities into multimodal protocols. The most direct clinical scenario is the patient with chronic muscular TMD who does not respond adequately to occlusal splint and initial pharmacologic management — exactly the profile that arrives at the pain service after months of conventional dental treatment. Laser acupuncture stands out in practice because it is noninvasive and free of contraindications associated with needling, broadening the therapeutic range for patients on anticoagulants, with needle phobia, or with marked central sensitization profile, where tolerance to invasive procedures is reduced.
▸ Notable Findings
The most striking finding of this meta-analysis is the magnitude of the laser acupuncture effect, with an OR of 14.08 — numerically higher than that obtained by conventional needle acupuncture (OR 6.20) — which challenges the usual perception that the noninvasive modality would necessarily be less effective. Both confidence intervals are wide, reflecting sample variability, but the low heterogeneity among the included studies strengthens the consistency of the signal. Another noteworthy aspect is that the benefits concentrate in TMDs of muscular origin, corresponding to 90-95% of cases with facial pain without identifiable structural cause — exactly the subgroup with greatest demand in rehabilitation services. Improvement in mouth opening, reported in four of the eleven studies, adds a functional dimension to the outcome, going beyond isolated pain relief and directly addressing functional limitations such as chewing and speech.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in a musculoskeletal pain service, I usually see the first signs of response in muscular TMD as early as the third or fourth acupuncture session, especially when the protocol includes local points such as ST-6, ST-7, and SI-19 combined with distal modulation points such as LI-4 and ST-36. On average, I work with cycles of eight to ten sessions to consolidate the response, followed by biweekly or monthly maintenance depending on evolution. I have systematically combined needling with orofacial physical therapy and cervical postural guidance, since coactivation of the masticatory and cervical muscles is routine in these patients. The profile that responds best, in my observation, is pure muscular TMD without ankylosis or relevant structural articular alteration — exactly aligned with the most studied subgroup in this review. When there is a significant degenerative articular component or suspicion of systemic inflammatory arthropathy, I refer for specialized evaluation before initiating the needling protocol.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
BMC Oral Health · 2024
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03806-1
Access original articleThis study underpins the editorial content of the site.
Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.
Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories