Laser acupuncture improves cortical excitability and behavioural performance in healthy individuals: a randomized controlled trial

Liu et al. · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · 2026

🎯Blinded Crossover RCT👥n = 18 participantsHigh methodological impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
78/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of laser acupuncture at motor points on corticospinal excitability and behavioral performance

👥

WHO

18 right-handed healthy adults (10F/8M, mean age 29 years)

⏱️

DURATION

4 sessions of 5 minutes each, with a minimum interval of 48 hours

📍

POINTS

LI-4 (Hegu, 合谷), LI-10 (Shousanli, 手三里), LI-11 (Quchi, 曲池) of the Large Intestine meridian

🔬 Study Design

18participants
randomization

LI-4

n=18

Laser acupuncture at Hegu (合谷)

LI-10

n=18

Laser acupuncture at Shousanli (手三里)

LI-11

n=18

Laser acupuncture at Quchi (曲池)

Sham

n=18

Placebo laser without light emission

⏱️ Duration: 4 sessions in a crossover design

📊 Results in numbers

p < 0.01

Improvement in corticospinal excitability (LI-4 and LI-10)

p < 0.05

Reduction in reaction time (LI-4)

p < 0.01

Modulation of intracortical inhibition

p < 0.034

Influence of participant expectation

📊 Outcome Comparison

Corticospinal Excitability (MEP amplitude)

LI-4
85
LI-10
82
LI-11
65
Sham
45
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that laser acupuncture at specific points on the hand and arm can improve brain activity and reaction time in a noninvasive, painless way. The results suggest that this technique may be a promising alternative for neural stimulation, especially useful for those with needle phobia.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This pioneering study investigated the effects of laser acupuncture (LA) on corticospinal excitability and behavioral performance in healthy adults, using a rigorous methodological approach that combines transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with behavioral measures. The research fills an important gap in knowledge about the neurobiological mechanisms of LA, a noninvasive modality that uses low-intensity laser radiation at acupoints. The study employed a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind crossover design involving 18 right-handed healthy participants who completed four experimental sessions. Each participant received LA at three points of the Large Intestine meridian — LI-4 (Hegu, 合谷), LI-10 (Shousanli, 手三里), and LI-11 (Quchi, 曲池) — in addition to a control session with placebo laser.

The choice of these points was based on a previous meta-analysis identifying their relevance to motor function and their innervation by the radial and median nerves, corresponding to spinal segments C5–C8. The protocol used a gallium aluminum arsenide laser (655 nm, 50 mW) for 5 minutes per point, with a total dose of 7.5 J per session. Neurobiological measures included assessment of corticospinal excitability via motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, along with paired-pulse protocols to quantify short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). These measures provide insight into the underlying GABAergic and glutamatergic mechanisms.

Behavioral performance was assessed through the Purdue Pegboard test for manual dexterity and computerized reaction-time tasks via PsyToolkit. Results demonstrated that LA at LI-4 and LI-10 produced significant increases in corticospinal excitability compared with baseline and placebo conditions (p < 0.01), whereas LI-11 showed only a non-significant trend. Analyses of intracortical circuits revealed that LI-4 and LI-10 reduced GABAergic inhibition (SICI and LICI) and increased glutamatergic facilitation (ICF), suggesting modulation of inhibitory and excitatory systems. Behaviorally, LI-4 significantly improved reaction time (p < 0.05), whereas LI-10 showed immediate post-intervention effects.

Analysis of individual factors revealed that participant expectation was a significant predictor of response to LA (p < 0.034), highlighting the importance of top-down cognitive mechanisms in neuroplasticity. The clinical implications are substantial, since LA offers distinct advantages over traditional acupuncture: painless application, shorter sessions, minimal adverse events, and greater capacity for experimental blinding. The proposed mechanisms involve photobiomodulation through mitochondrial ATP production, reduction of inflammation, and improvement of microcirculation. Limitations include the population of young healthy adults, which may show ceiling effects limiting detectable improvements, assessment only of immediate effects without long-term follow-up, and a single-blind design.

The study establishes neurobiological foundations for LA as a neuromodulation technique, with point specificity evidenced by the different response profiles among LI-4, LI-10, and LI-11 despite their belonging to the same meridian.

Strengths

  • 1First study combining LA with TMS measures in humans
  • 2Controlled, randomized crossover design
  • 3Multiple neurobiological and behavioral measures
  • 4Analysis of individual modulating factors
  • 5Rigorous methodology with control of confounding variables
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Population limited to young healthy adults
  • 2Assessment only of immediate effects
  • 3Single-blind design
  • 4Possible ceiling effects in healthy participants
  • 5Relatively small sample size
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Laser acupuncture has been gaining ground in rehabilitation services precisely because it bypasses the barrier of needle phobia, frequent in pediatric and oncology populations and in patients with anxiety disorders who would otherwise benefit from acupoint stimulation. What this work adds is an architecture of neurobiological measurement — motor evoked potentials and paired-pulse protocols using transcranial magnetic stimulation — that allows us to move from the realm of clinical plausibility into measurable physiology. The point specificity demonstrated among LI-4, LI-10, and LI-11, all on the same meridian, has direct implications for therapeutic protocols: it is not enough to apply laser at any point of the upper limb expecting motor effect. For physiatrists who design neuromodulation programs in post-stroke motor rehabilitation or in chronic pain with central components, the evidence of GABAergic and glutamatergic modulation by a noninvasive route opens a concrete therapeutic window.

Notable Findings

The most intriguing finding is not the improvement in corticospinal excitability itself, but the functional dissociation among anatomically adjacent points: LI-4 and LI-10 produced significant increases in motor evoked potentials and reduced short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition, while LI-11 — only a few centimeters away — remained at a non-significant trend. This empirically validates the concept of point specificity and challenges purely nonspecific explanations based on placebo effect or local tissue heating. The improvement in reaction time with LI-4, combined with modulation of intracortical facilitation, suggests that the effect reaches the motor cortex via somatosensory afferent pathways — likely through the radial and median nerves that innervate the region. Equally relevant is the predictive role of participant expectation on response to laser acupuncture, reinforcing that top-down cognitive mechanisms actively participate in the neuroplasticity induced by peripheral stimuli.

From My Experience

In my practice at the pain and rehabilitation clinic, I have used laser acupuncture mainly as a point of entry for patients who refuse dry needling or conventional acupuncture with metallic needles — and adherence is notably higher. What the article documents instrumentally confirms what I tend to observe clinically: LI-4 has a more versatile response profile, with effects that go beyond local analgesia. In patients with upper-limb myofascial pain syndrome associated with a central component, I tend to see perceptible reduction in muscle tension and improvement in fine dexterity after three to four sessions, which aligns with the immediate effects documented here. For maintenance, I usually work with cycles of eight to twelve sessions, combining laser acupuncture with targeted kinesiotherapy and, when needed, pharmacological modulation of the central component. The patient profile that responds best in my experience is one with moderate central sensitization, without established analgesic dependence and with good capacity for therapeutic engagement — which converges with the finding that expectation was a significant predictor of response in this study.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · 2026

DOI: 10.1186/s12906-026-05259-9

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.