Effectiveness of acupuncture on anxiety disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Yang et al. · Annals of General Psychiatry · 2021
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether acupuncture has a positive effect on the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder
WHO
Patients with generalized anxiety disorder diagnosed by standardized criteria
DURATION
Treatments ranging from 3 to 10 weeks
POINTS
Baihui, Yintang, Sishencong, Neiguan, Sanyinjiao, Taichong, and other points to calm the mind
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture
n=912
Traditional acupuncture or electroacupuncture
Control
n=911
Western medications, traditional Chinese medicine, or sham acupuncture
📊 Results in numbers
Reduction in anxiety symptoms
Confidence interval
Statistical significance
Dropout rate
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Improvement in anxiety symptoms (Standardized Mean Difference)
This study showed that acupuncture can be an effective option for treating generalized anxiety, with better outcomes than conventional medications. Acupuncture proved safe, with few side effects and good patient acceptance, providing symptom relief within a few weeks of treatment.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Acupuncture for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder shows promising results according to a large scientific study published by Chinese researchers in 2021. This work represents one of the most important reviews ever performed on the topic, gathering evidence from multiple studies to offer a clearer view of the effectiveness of this ancient therapy in the treatment of anxiety problems.
Generalized anxiety disorder has become a global mental-health problem, affecting approximately 7.6% of the Chinese population over a lifetime and constituting the largest group of mental disorders in Western societies. This condition manifests as excessive, uncontrollable, and often irrational worry, accompanied by physical symptoms such as tachycardia, muscle tension, pain, and difficulty relaxing. Although conventional treatments such as antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy are considered first-line, many patients do not respond adequately or do not tolerate the side effects of medications, leading them to seek complementary therapies such as acupuncture.
To scientifically investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture in anxiety disorder, the researchers conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, considered the gold standard for evaluating scientific evidence. They analyzed data from multiple international and Chinese scientific databases, searching for studies published between 2000 and 2019 that compared acupuncture with other treatments in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Only randomized controlled trials were included, representing the most rigorous study type for evaluating medical treatments. In the end, twenty studies involving 1,823 patients were analyzed, all focused specifically on generalized anxiety disorder.
The results demonstrated that acupuncture was significantly more effective than control treatments in reducing anxiety symptoms. The effect size found was considered moderate, with a statistical value of -0.41, indicating a clinically relevant improvement. This effectiveness remained consistent when the researchers analyzed different subgroups of studies. Interestingly, acupuncture was more effective when symptoms were rated by the patients themselves than when rated by clinicians, suggesting that the benefits may be particularly perceptible in the subjective experience of well-being.
In addition, treatments shorter than six weeks showed superior results compared with longer-duration treatments, indicating that acupuncture can offer relatively rapid relief of anxiety symptoms.
In terms of safety and tolerability, acupuncture demonstrated a very favorable profile. Reported adverse effects were minimal and included mainly mild pain at the needling site, small bruises, sensation of dizziness during treatment, and minimal bleeding. All these effects are considered mild and transient. The dropout rate was low, less than 20% of patients, similar to or lower than that observed in control groups, indicating good treatment acceptability.
This compares favorably with anxiolytic medications, which frequently cause side effects such as drowsiness, dependence, and memory problems.
For patients suffering from generalized anxiety disorder, these results suggest that acupuncture may be a valuable therapeutic option, either as a primary treatment or as a complement to conventional therapies. The rapid onset of action observed is particularly attractive, since many anxiolytic medications take weeks to reach their full effect. For healthcare professionals, the study offers robust evidence to consider acupuncture as an integral part of the therapeutic plan, especially for patients who do not tolerate medications or who prefer less invasive approaches. The safety demonstrated makes acupuncture a low-risk option that can be offered with confidence.
However, the study has some important limitations that should be considered. All studies analyzed were conducted in China, which may limit the applicability of the results to other populations and cultures. The significant heterogeneity among studies indicates that the results should be interpreted with caution, since different acupuncture protocols and assessment methods may have influenced the results. In addition, most articles were published in Chinese, creating a possible regional publication bias.
Another limitation is that only generalized anxiety disorder was studied, so the results cannot be extrapolated to other anxiety disorders such as panic disorder, phobias, or social anxiety.
The findings of this study represent a significant advance in understanding the role of acupuncture in the treatment of anxiety, providing solid scientific evidence for a practice that has been used for thousands of years. Although more high-quality studies, conducted in different countries and populations, are needed to confirm these results, the current evidence is encouraging and suggests that acupuncture deserves serious consideration as an effective and safe therapeutic option for generalized anxiety disorder.
Strengths
- 1Large number of participants (1,823)
- 2Rigorous analysis of 20 controlled trials
- 3Demonstrated safety and good tolerability
- 4Consistent positive effects across different subgroups
Limitations
- 1High heterogeneity across studies
- 2All studies conducted in China
- 3Only generalized anxiety disorder was studied
- 4Most articles published in Chinese
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Generalized anxiety disorder represents one of the most prevalent diagnoses in chronic-pain and psychiatry clinics, and the share of patients who do not tolerate or do not respond adequately to antidepressants and benzodiazepines is substantial in daily practice. This meta-analysis, gathering 1,823 participants from 20 randomized trials, provides quantitative support for integrating acupuncture into the therapeutic armamentarium systematically, not just as a last resort. The moderate effect size of -0.41 (95% CI -0.50 to -0.31, p < 0.001) has direct clinical translation: patients with somatic complaints associated with anxiety — muscle tension, tachycardia, insomnia — are natural candidates for an approach that simultaneously acts on the autonomic axis and on the subjective experience of suffering. The safety demonstrated and the dropout rate under 20% make acupuncture especially pertinent for older adults, pregnant patients, or those with comorbidities that contraindicate polypharmacy.
▸ Notable Findings
Two findings stand out for their interpretive value. First, acupuncture showed superior effects when outcomes were assessed by the patient versus structured clinical assessments — a finding that points to a particularly robust impact on subjective well-being, a dimension often overlooked in standardized clinical scales. Second, and counterintuitively, protocols shorter than six weeks produced results superior to those of longer duration, suggesting that the anxiolytic effect of acupuncture manifests early and does not require prolonged courses to consolidate initial benefit. This pattern of rapid response contrasts with the pharmacodynamic profile of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, whose therapeutic latency usually frustrates patients in the first weeks. The consistency of positive effects in the various subgroups analyzed reinforces the robustness of the observed clinical signal.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the Acupuncture Group of the Pain Center at HC-FMUSP, I have observed that patients with generalized anxiety associated with chronic musculoskeletal pain make up the profile that benefits most from acupuncture as an adjuvant resource. The subjective response tends to emerge between the third and fifth session — the patient reports sleeping better, feeling less neck tension, and a less invasive quality of worry. I usually run initial cycles of eight to ten weekly sessions and, when there is a consistent response, space them out to biweekly or monthly maintenance. I frequently combine acupuncture with autonomic-regulation techniques — including low-frequency electroacupuncture on points such as PC-6, HT-7, and GV-20 — and concurrently refer to cognitive-behavioral therapy when available. I do not typically indicate acupuncture as monotherapy in anxiety with an intense phobic component or with high-severity anxious ideation without adequate pharmacologic coverage. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with mild-to-moderate anxiety, high sensitivity to medication side effects, and a strong somatic component to the complaints.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Annals of General Psychiatry · 2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12991-021-00327-5
Access original articleThis study underpins the editorial content of the site.
Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.
Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories