Skip to content

Acupuncture Anesthesia: History, Dilemma and Future

Yang et al. · Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science · 2026

📖Narrative Review🌍Global Perspective📈Historical Analysis

Evidence Level

MODERATE
75/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
3/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Analyze the history, current applications, and future perspectives of acupuncture anesthesia in the perioperative period

🏥

APPLICATIONS

Thyroid, abdominal, pulmonary, and dental procedures

📅

PERIOD

Historical analysis from 1958 to future perspectives

📍

POINTS

LI-4 (Hegu) and PC-6 (Neiguan) are the most used in acupuncture anesthesia

🔬 Study Design

0participants
randomization

Narrative Review

n=0

Analysis of literature on acupuncture anesthesia

⏱️ Duration: Non-systematic review

📊 Results in numbers

0%

Reduction in anesthetic consumption

0%

Reduction in VAS scale

0%

Reduction in postoperative complications

<10%

Current use in China

Percentage highlights

70%
Reduction in anesthetic consumption
18.3%
Reduction in VAS scale
32.3%
Reduction in postoperative complications
<10%
Current use in China

📊 Outcome Comparison

Anesthetic efficacy

Acupuncture + Pharmacologic
85
Pharmacologic Alone
70
💬 What does this mean for you?

Acupuncture anesthesia combines traditional Chinese techniques with modern anesthesia to reduce pain during and after surgery. Although it does not completely replace conventional anesthesia, it can significantly decrease the amount of medication needed and the rate of postoperative complications.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of acupuncture anesthesia (AA), a technique that integrates traditional Chinese medicine with modern anesthetic practice. The research traces the historical evolution of AA from its origins in 1950s China, when Dr. Yin Hui-Zhu performed the first surgery using acupuncture exclusively for anesthesia in 1958, to its contemporary applications in the perioperative period. The development of AA followed distinct trajectories in China and Western countries.

In China, the technique experienced rapid growth during the 1960s and 1970s, driven by limitations in narcotic production and political support. The peak occurred in 1966, when the Ministry of Health officially adopted the practice nationally. Internationally, interest arose after reports in JAMA in 1971 and President Nixon's visit to China in 1972, which demonstrated the technique to the Western world. The mechanisms underlying AA involve multiple physiological systems.

Acupuncture analgesia operates through endogenous opioid mechanisms, activating delta and mu receptors, modulating neurotransmitters such as GABA and serotonin, and influencing the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Neuroimaging studies reveal that acupuncture activates specific brain regions, including the sensory cortex, prefrontal cortex, and insula, which are fundamental in pain perception and emotional regulation. AA is currently applied as adjuvant therapy in various surgical procedures, including thyroid, abdominal, and pulmonary surgeries. The most frequently used acupuncture points are LI-4 (Hegu) and PC-6 (Neiguan), known for their potent analgesic properties.

The combination of acupuncture with pharmacologic anesthesia shows significant advantages: a 70% reduction in anesthetic consumption, an 18.3% decrease in pain scores on the visual analog scale, and a 32.3% reduction in postoperative complications. The combined approach also preserves cervical muscle tone, maintains airway patency, stabilizes hemodynamic parameters, and provides effective organ protection. Despite these benefits, AA faces significant challenges that limit its widespread adoption. The lack of standardization represents a major obstacle, with few studies establishing clear criteria for acupuncture point selection and stimulation parameters.

Individual variability in response to AA increases clinical risks, and infectious complications, although rare, have been documented. The standalone application of AA remains challenging, especially in major surgery, limiting its efficacy to small-scale case series. The scarcity of professionals specialized in AA represents another obstacle, compounded by the absence of systematized training programs and standardized curricula. Future prospects for AA are promising, especially in the context of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.

Future development should focus on industry standardization through efficient acupuncture point selection, optimization of needling techniques, refinement of electroacupuncture use, establishment of efficacy assessment methods, and implementation of standardized training and education. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and acupuncture robots, offer opportunities for more consistent and standardized treatment protocols. Global recognition of AA is growing, evidenced by the consistent increase in international publications from 2005 to 2022. Countries such as the United States, South Korea, and Germany are leading research, suggesting increased acceptance of acupuncture as a complementary therapy.

The integration of AA into public hospitals in countries such as Malaysia since 2006 demonstrates its potential for global dissemination. Modern AA differs significantly from its historical application, functioning primarily as a perioperative adjuvant modality rather than as an independent anesthetic technique. Its role centers on holistic regulation to reduce perioperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, postoperative pain, and cognitive impairment. This approach offers particular benefits for vulnerable populations, including the elderly, pregnant patients, and patients with severe adverse reactions to traditional anesthetics.

In conclusion, AA represents a promising perioperative adjuvant modality with significant therapeutic potential. Its role in improving postoperative recovery is gaining growing recognition, providing a solid basis for integration into various medical disciplines. Growing acceptance highlights AA's potential to complement traditional methods, offering a valuable tool to improve patient outcomes and broaden the scope of modern anesthetic practice.

Strengths

  • 1Comprehensive historical analysis from 1958 onward
  • 2Detailed discussion of mechanisms of action
  • 3Global coverage of the development of the technique
  • 4Clear identification of current challenges
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Non-systematic narrative review
  • 2Variable quality of included studies
  • 3Lack of standardized quantitative data
  • 4Absence of meta-analysis
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Acupuncture anesthesia re-emerges in the perioperative setting not as a historical curiosity but as an adjuvant strategy with concrete efficacy data. A 70% reduction in anesthetic consumption and a 32.3% reduction in postoperative complications are figures any anesthesiologist or intensive care physician should take seriously. The most immediate context of application is in ERAS protocols, where optimization of multimodal analgesia is central. Populations such as the elderly — often sensitive to standard doses of opioids and general anesthetics — pregnant patients, and patients with a history of severe adverse reactions to traditional anesthetics are natural candidates for this combined approach. The inclusion of points such as LI-4 and PC-6 in the perioperative arsenal, by physicians with specific training, represents a logical extension of what we already do in chronic pain to the domain of acute and perioperative pain.

Notable Findings

What stands out most in this review is that the historical trajectory simultaneously reveals the potential and the limits of the technique: the political-institutional peak in 1960s-1970s China was followed by decline to less than 10% of current use, which in itself is a clinically relevant fact — it indicates that acupuncture alone as full anesthesia is impractical in modern major surgery. What persists and consolidates is the adjuvant role. The mechanisms described — activation of endogenous delta and mu opioid receptors, GABAergic and serotonergic modulation, influence on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and activation of cortical regions identified by neuroimaging — provide robust pathophysiologic grounding for the 18.3% reduction in postoperative VAS scores. The preservation of cervical muscle tone and the hemodynamic stability documented during thyroid and thoracic procedures are findings of immediate applicability.

From My Experience

In my practice at the Acupuncture Group of the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, the interface with the perioperative setting arrived gradually — first as support for postoperative pain in patients referred after hospital discharge, then as active participation in preoperative preparation protocols. I have observed that patients undergoing electroacupuncture sessions three to five days before medium-sized procedures report lower analgesic consumption in the first 48 hours, which echoes the data in this review. I usually start with PC-6 and LI-4, adding ST-36 for autonomic support, especially in the elderly. The acute analgesic response is typically perceptible by the first or second perioperative session. The patient profile that responds best is one with a good sense of De Qi, without severe uncontrolled anxiety, and with integrated clinical support — anesthesiologist, surgeon, and acupuncture physician aligned around the same protocol. When the team is not trained or adequate intraoperative monitoring is lacking, I do not recommend the adjuvant technique in the surgical field.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science · 2026

DOI: 10.1007/s44254-025-00153-y

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.