Safety of Acupuncture: Overview of Systematic Reviews
Chan et al. · Scientific Reports · 2017
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Synthesize evidence on adverse events of acupuncture and related therapies through systematic reviews
WHO
Patients who received acupuncture, electroacupuncture, auriculotherapy, and other related modalities
PERIOD
Reviews published from 1996 to 2015, covering studies dating from 1949
THERAPIES
Needle acupuncture, electroacupuncture, cupping, moxibustion, acupressure, and other modalities
🔬 Study Design
Included reviews
n=17
Analysis of reported adverse events
📊 Results in numbers
Serious adverse events with mortality
Pneumothorax (median cases)
Infections (median cases)
Local events (median cases)
Other complications (median cases)
📊 Outcome Comparison
Types of adverse events by category
This study shows that acupuncture is generally safe but not completely free of risks, as many people believe. Although serious adverse events are rare, they can occur and some can be fatal, reinforcing the importance of seeking well-trained and qualified professionals.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This comprehensive overview analyzed 17 systematic reviews published between 1996 and 2015 to examine all reported adverse events associated with acupuncture and related therapies. The study included reviews that covered a median of 43 primary studies and 279 patients, spanning various modalities such as traditional acupuncture, electroacupuncture, auriculotherapy, cupping, and moxibustion. The search was conducted in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception through December 2015. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR instrument, revealing overall median quality.
Only one review provided an a priori protocol, and only one adequately appraised the scientific quality of the included primary studies. The investigators identified four main categories of adverse events. The first category comprised injuries to organs or tissues, reported in 13 reviews with a median of 36 cases and 4 deaths. The most common events included pneumothorax (median 25.5 cases), central nervous system or spinal cord injuries (median 13 cases), subarachnoid or intracranial hemorrhage (median 35 cases), and cardiac tamponade (median 7 cases).
The second category involved infections, documented in 11 reviews with a median of 17 cases and 0.5 deaths. The most frequent infections were hepatitis (median 94 cases), abscesses (median 7 cases), tetanus (median 6 cases), and ear infections. The third category covered local adverse events or reactions, reported in 12 reviews with a median of 8.5 cases and no deaths. These included contact dermatitis or local allergic reactions, argyria, local bleeding, local pain or tenderness, local burns, and hematomas.
The fourth category included other complications reported in 11 reviews with a median of 21 cases and no deaths, with dizziness or syncope being the most common (median 10.5 cases). The study revealed that, contrary to the common impression that acupuncture is harmless, both minor and serious adverse events can occur. Although serious events are rare, they warrant significant attention due to the potential for associated mortality. The authors identified several important limitations, including the inability to determine causality in most reported cases, lack of adequate follow-up of many adverse events, and substantial concerns about underreporting.
Many publications came from physicians treating interesting complications, potentially leading to publication bias. Some reviews found that no adverse events were reported by acupuncturists, raising questions about practitioners' awareness of complications. Clinical implications include the need for practitioners to pay adequate attention to patient risk stratification, the implementation of more rigorous sterilization practices, improvement of patient education on common and serious risks, and improvement in practitioners' recognition of acute complications. The study emphasizes that referrals should consider the credibility of acupuncturists' training and that patient safety should be a central component of acupuncture education.
The authors recommend the establishment of standardized reporting platforms for adverse events and better communication between physicians treating complications and the practitioners who administered the acupuncture.
Strengths
- 1First comprehensive synthesis of all systematic reviews on acupuncture adverse events
- 2Systematic search across multiple databases covering 20 years of literature
- 3Methodological quality assessment using the validated AMSTAR instrument
- 4Clear and structured categorization of adverse event types
- 5Analysis of various acupuncture modalities and related therapies
Limitations
- 1Inability to determine definitive causality between acupuncture and adverse events
- 2Median methodological quality of included reviews
- 3Lack of follow-up data for many reported cases
- 4Likely significant underreporting of adverse events
- 5Inability to calculate incidence rates due to data heterogeneity
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
For clinicians who refer patients to acupuncture or who practice it in a pain and rehabilitation service, this overview of 17 systematic reviews covering two decades of literature offers the most complete map currently available on the safety profile of the technique. The structured categorization — organ and tissue injuries, infections, local events, and other complications — allows the attending physician to stratify risk before referral. Pneumothorax and spinal cord injuries are not theoretical findings; they appear with case medians that justify pre-procedure screening protocols, especially in patients with coagulopathy, immunosuppression, or compromised thoracic anatomy. The documentation of hepatitis as the most frequent infection reinforces requirements for sterilization and use of single-use needles as a non-negotiable standard. In multidisciplinary pain services, these data should be integrated into the informed consent form and the pre-session checklist.
▸ Notable Findings
The finding that deserves the most attention is the coexistence of four deaths associated with organ injuries against zero deaths in the categories of local infection and minor adverse events — a pattern suggesting that maximum severity is concentrated in technical errors of depth and needle placement, not in unpredictable systemic reactions. The median of 25.5 pneumothorax cases in acupuncture reviews is clinically striking and repositions thoracic risk as a priority in medical training. Equally relevant is the documentation of dizziness and syncope as the most prevalent complications in the 'other' category, with a median of 10.5 cases — manageable events when anticipated, but requiring a positioning protocol and minimum monitoring in the treatment room. The underreporting documented by the authors themselves indicates that these numbers are floors, not ceilings.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, the safety profile described in this overview matches well what I have accumulated over decades: nearly all adverse events I have witnessed or received by referral were vasovagal syncope and local hematoma, both manageable with simple protocols of supine positioning and local pressure. Pneumothorax never occurred in our service, but it required formal discussion after I received a patient referred with pleuritic pain following acupuncture performed outside the service. From that episode onward, I instituted mandatory assessment of needling depth in the upper dorsal and cervicothoracic regions for all residents. Patients with very low body mass index, chronic cough, or post-pneumonectomy automatically enter a protocol of superficial needling or redirection. For the profile that responds best — myofascial low back or cervical pain without relevant comorbidities — I typically see consistent functional response from the third or fourth session, with usual cycles of eight to twelve sessions before spacing to maintenance.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Scientific Reports · 2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03272-0
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories