Neurophysiological effects of latent trigger point dry needling on spinal reflexes
Seif et al. · Journal of Neurophysiology · 2025
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To investigate the effects of dry needling at latent trigger points on the excitability of spinal reflexes
WHO
17 healthy adults (22-57 years) with latent trigger points in the medial gastrocnemius
DURATION
Assessments before, immediately, 90 minutes, and 72 hours after treatment
POINTS
Latent trigger points in the medial gastrocnemius
🔬 Study Design
Single group with dry needling
n=17
Dry needling at trigger points of the medial gastrocnemius
📊 Results in numbers
Reduction in M-wave amplitude in the medial gastrocnemius
Increase in reciprocal inhibition of the soleus
Improvement in ankle range of motion
M-wave recovery at 72 h
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
M-wave amplitude (mV)
This study showed that dry needling at trigger points causes specific temporary changes in the treated muscle and lasting effects on spinal cord function. The treatment improved ankle flexibility and altered communication between muscles, suggesting benefits beyond the treated site.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This pioneering research investigated how dry needling at trigger points (small painful nodules in muscles) affects spinal cord function and muscle reflexes. The study was motivated by the growing clinical use of dry needling to treat pain and spasticity, but with limited scientific knowledge about its neurological mechanisms of action. The researchers recruited 17 healthy adults who had latent (inactive) trigger points in the medial gastrocnemius muscle of the calf. These latent trigger points are common even in healthy people and can affect muscle function.
The experimental protocol included detailed neurological assessments at four time points: before treatment, immediately after, 90 minutes later, and 72 hours after a single session of dry needling. Measurements included spinal reflexes (H-reflex and reciprocal inhibition), M-waves (which assess neuromuscular integrity), and passive ankle range of motion. During dry needling, the researchers identified the trigger points through palpation and inserted disposable acupuncture needles until eliciting a local twitch response, followed by vertical needle movements for 25-30 seconds until those twitches were eliminated. The results revealed complex and specific effects.
In the treated muscle (medial gastrocnemius), M-wave amplitude decreased significantly soon after treatment (14% reduction) and at 90 minutes (18% reduction), returning to normal at 72 hours. This pattern did not occur in adjacent untreated muscles, indicating specific local effects likely related to temporary microlesions of muscle fibers and nerve endings. Surprisingly, although the H-reflex (an excitatory reflex) did not change significantly, reciprocal inhibition of the soleus muscle increased by 30% immediately after treatment and by 36% at 72 hours. Reciprocal inhibition is a neurological mechanism in which the activation of one muscle automatically inhibits its antagonist, and its increase suggests changes in the excitability of inhibitory spinal circuits.
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion improved by 4 degrees immediately and by 3 degrees at 72 hours, correlating temporally with changes in reciprocal inhibition. The findings are clinically relevant for several reasons. First, they demonstrate that dry needling produces specific neuroplastic effects in the spinal cord, not limited to the treatment site. Second, the selectivity of the effects — with inhibitory reflexes increasing while excitatory reflexes remained unchanged — suggests complex mechanisms that may be therapeutically useful.
Third, the temporal pattern of effects (immediate and at 72 hours) may inform treatment protocols and timing of complementary interventions. Limitations include the absence of a control group, a relatively small sample, and a healthy study population, limiting generalization to pathological conditions. The study represents an important advance in understanding the neurological mechanisms of dry needling, providing evidence that this technique produces measurable changes in spinal circuits that may explain its observed clinical benefits in conditions such as post-stroke spasticity.
Strengths
- 1First study to systematically investigate the neurological effects of dry needling
- 2Rigorous methodology with multiple temporal assessment points
- 3Muscle-specific analysis allowing identification of local vs. systemic effects
- 4Use of standardized neurological techniques to assess spinal reflexes
Limitations
- 1Absence of a control or sham group
- 2Small sample of healthy participants
- 3Limited generalization to clinical populations
- 4Only one muscle treated, limiting understanding of broader effects
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Dry needling of latent trigger points in the medial gastrocnemius produced demonstrable neuroplastic effects on inhibitory spinal circuits, with a 30% increase in reciprocal inhibition of the soleus immediately after treatment and 36% at 72 hours, accompanied by a 4-degree gain in passive ankle dorsiflexion. For those working in neurofunctional rehabilitation, this response pattern has direct implications: patients with post-stroke ankle spasticity, adaptive triceps surae shortening after immobilization, or repetitive eccentric overload in athletes are scenarios where a preferential effect on inhibitory circuits would be highly desirable. The finding that the M-wave returned to baseline at 72 hours while reciprocal inhibition remained elevated at that same time point suggests that segmental spinal effects are not a mere epiphenomenon of the local change in the treated muscle but represent an independent and sustained physiological phenomenon.
▸ Notable Findings
The temporal dissociation between local and spinal effects is the most intellectually provocative finding of this work. M-wave amplitude dropped 14% immediately and 18% at 90 minutes, returning to normal at 72 hours — compatible with transient microlesion of muscle fibers and nerve endings at the needling site. Meanwhile, reciprocal inhibition of the soleus followed an inverse trajectory: it increased immediately and was even greater at 72 hours, when the treated muscle had already fully recovered. This independence between local effect and segmental effect is the most robust evidence that dry needling mobilizes spinal circuits beyond the local twitch response. The fact that the H-reflex did not change while the Ia inhibitory pathway increased indicates selectivity in the recruitment of inhibitory interneurons — not a global depression of medullary excitability.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, the gastrocnemius is one of the muscles I most frequently treat with dry needling in runners and patients with neurological sequelae, and what Seif et al. document neurophysiologically corresponds to what I have observed clinically for years: the improvement in ankle range of motion appears already in the first session, but the reduction in muscle tension perceived by the patient is often more clearly noticeable between 48 and 72 hours later. I typically see relevant functional response in 3 to 4 sessions in patients with athletic overload, and in those with mild to moderate post-stroke spasticity the facilitating effect on gait typically emerges after 5 to 6 sessions combined with motor physical therapy. The profile that responds best, in my experience, is the patient with hypertonia without established fibrotic contractures — exactly the scenario where an increase in reciprocal inhibition would make a real biomechanical difference. I do not prescribe dry needling as monotherapy in severe spasticity; I use it as an adjunct to botulinum toxin.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Journal of Neurophysiology · 2025
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00366.2024
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories