How effective is acupuncture for reducing pain due to plantar fasciitis?
Thiagarajah · Singapore Medical Journal · 2017
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
To determine the efficacy of acupuncture in reducing pain caused by plantar fasciitis
WHO
144 patients with plantar fasciitis from 4 controlled studies
DURATION
4-8 weeks of treatment, follow-up up to 6 months
POINTS
PC-7 (Daling), local points in the plantar fascia, electroacupuncture
🔬 Study Design
True acupuncture
n=72
Traditional acupuncture or electroacupuncture
Control
n=72
Standard therapy or sham acupuncture
📊 Results in numbers
Significant pain reduction at 4-8 weeks
Benefits maintained at 6 months
Minimal adverse effects
Study quality (Delphi)
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Pain reduction (VAS)
This study shows that acupuncture can be effective in reducing plantar fasciitis pain in the short term (4-8 weeks). The benefits appear to diminish after that period, and more studies are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
Plantar fasciitis is a very common condition that affects millions of people annually, characterized by intense heel pain that typically worsens in the morning upon taking the first steps. This condition occurs when there is inflammation or microtears in the plantar fascia, a fibrous structure that connects the heel to the toes and provides support to the arch of the foot. Although various conventional treatments are available, such as physical therapy, orthotics, anti-inflammatory medications, and even surgery in severe cases, many patients seek complementary alternatives due to the persistent nature of the pain. Acupuncture has gained increasing interest as a therapeutic option, especially considering that local studies show that a significant proportion of patients with chronic pain use this ancient Chinese practice.
This scientific study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in relieving pain caused by plantar fasciitis. To this end, the researchers conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature, specifically searching for randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture with standard treatments or testing true acupuncture versus sham procedures. The search was conducted in the main medical databases, including PubMed and the Cochrane Library, using specific terms related to acupuncture and plantar fasciitis. The inclusion criteria were rigorous, selecting only studies that used traditional dry-needle acupuncture or electroacupuncture, excluding other modalities such as laser acupuncture.
The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Delphi list, an instrument that analyzes nine important criteria to determine the reliability of results.
The analysis identified four relevant studies that met the established criteria, involving a total of 144 patients with plantar fasciitis. Three studies compared acupuncture with conventional treatments, while one compared true acupuncture with sham acupuncture at different body points. The results were consistently positive, showing that acupuncture provided significant pain reduction measured through standardized scales such as the visual analog scale and the plantar fasciitis-specific pain and disability scale. The benefits were observed primarily between four and eight weeks of treatment, demonstrating that acupuncture can offer faster relief compared with conventional treatment alone.
It is important to note that side effects were minimal, mostly limited to small bruises or local swelling at the needle insertion site, and some patients reported mild pain after the procedure.
The clinical implications of these findings are promising for both patients and healthcare professionals. For people suffering from plantar fasciitis, acupuncture represents a safe and potentially effective therapeutic option, especially when conventional treatments do not provide adequate relief or when avoiding long-term anti-inflammatory medications is desired. Acupuncture can be particularly valuable as part of an integrated treatment plan, combining it with physical therapy, stretching exercises, and other conservative measures. For healthcare professionals, these results suggest that acupuncture should be considered a legitimate therapeutic option, especially given its favorable safety profile.
The fact that benefits appear relatively quickly, between one and two months of treatment, is also clinically relevant, as it offers hope of relief within a reasonable time frame for patients who often live with debilitating chronic pain.
However, it is essential to recognize the important limitations of this research. The number of available studies is still small, and each involved relatively few participants, ranging from 23 to 53 people. The methods of applying acupuncture varied considerably between studies, some using simple needles and others electroacupuncture, with differences in the specific points treated and session duration. Only one study followed patients for a longer six-month period, and it showed that the benefits of acupuncture did not remain superior to standard treatment in the long term.
This suggests that, although acupuncture may be effective for initial symptom relief, maintenance treatment or combination with other therapies may be necessary for lasting benefits. In addition, most studies could not implement adequate blinding of participants, which may have influenced the results due to positive expectations regarding acupuncture treatment. Therefore, although the results are encouraging, more studies with larger samples, more standardized methodology, and longer follow-up are needed to definitively establish the role of acupuncture in the treatment of plantar fasciitis and better guide patients and professionals on their realistic expectations regarding this complementary therapy.
Strengths
- 1Included randomized controlled trials
- 2Evaluated different types of acupuncture
- 3Minimal adverse effects reported
- 4Follow-up of up to 6 months
Limitations
- 1Only 4 studies included
- 2Small sample sizes
- 3Heterogeneous methods between studies
- 4Limitations in follow-up duration
Expert Commentary
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai
MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture
▸ Clinical Relevance
Plantar fasciitis is one of the most prevalent diagnoses in any physiatry or sports medicine outpatient clinic. Anyone who works with musculoskeletal pain knows that a considerable proportion of these patients arrive refractory to anti-inflammatories, orthotics, and conventional physical therapy. This systematic review, by demonstrating significant pain reduction with acupuncture at 4 to 8 weeks across all analyzed studies, provides support for including the technique as a component of a multimodal protocol, especially in patients who do not tolerate NSAIDs because of gastrointestinal or cardiovascular comorbidities, or who wish to avoid early injections. The safety profile, with adverse effects restricted to local bruising and mild post-needling pain, is particularly favorable for elderly populations or those on anticoagulation, where each invasive intervention requires careful consideration. The 4-to-8-week window corresponds exactly to the period when patients are most likely to abandon therapy out of frustration, making acupuncture a strategic ally at this critical moment.
▸ Notable Findings
The most clinically relevant finding in this review is the consistency of the effect: all four included randomized clinical trials showed significant pain reduction in the 4-to-8-week range, regardless of whether traditional acupuncture or electroacupuncture was used. This degree of internal consistency in musculoskeletal pain reviews is not trivial. We typically find discordant results between centers and techniques. The single study with prolonged 6-month follow-up showed that acupuncture's superiority over standard treatment did not persist at that time point, repositioning the technique as an acute- and subacute-phase intervention rather than an isolated long-term strategy. The direct comparison between true acupuncture and sham acupuncture at distinct points reinforces that the observed effect cannot be reduced to a pure expectation phenomenon, although the interpretation of this finding in plantar fasciitis deserves attention given the methodological minefield surrounding sham studies in this condition.
▸ From My Experience
In my musculoskeletal pain practice, refractory plantar fasciitis is a condition that requires patience and combination of strategies. I usually introduce acupuncture from the second or third week when the patient does not respond satisfactorily to the fascia and gastrocnemius stretching program combined with offloading orthotics. The analgesic response, in my experience, begins to appear between the third and fifth session, and our service's usual protocol is 8 to 10 weekly sessions, with reassessment for monthly maintenance thereafter. I have observed particularly good responses in patients with an associated myofascial component, with active trigger points in the soleus and flexor digitorum longus, where direct needling of these points, in addition to local points at the heel, potentiates the result. I do not prescribe acupuncture in isolation; I systematically combine it with eccentric training and, when there is evident biomechanical overload, with footwear adjustment. The finding that benefits do not remain superior to conventional treatment at 6 months confirms what I see in the clinic: without parallel functional rehabilitation, recurrence is frequent.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Singapore Medical Journal · 2017
DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016143
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories