Skip to content

The effects of dry needling on pain relief and functional balance in patients with sub-chronic low back pain

Loizidis et al. · Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · 2020

🎲Randomized Controlled Trial👥n=25 participantsImmediate Impact

Evidence Level

MODERATE
65/ 100
Quality
3/5
Sample
2/5
Replication
3/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the immediate effects of dry needling on pain and functional balance in patients with subacute low back pain

👥

WHO

25 patients with subacute low back pain (6 weeks to 3 months)

⏱️

DURATION

Single 10–15-minute session

📍

POINTS

Bilateral L2–L5 paravertebral muscles and interspinous spaces

🔬 Study Design

25participants
randomization

Dry Needling

n=12

Needles inserted into lumbar paravertebral muscles

Control

n=13

No intervention; reassessment after 15 minutes

⏱️ Duration: Immediate evaluation (before and after intervention)

📊 Results in numbers

4.87 to 6.52 kg/cm²

Increase in pain tolerance

43.2 to 54.9%

Improvement in rhythmic control

p < 0.05

Statistical significance

Percentage highlights

43.2 to 54.9%
Improvement in rhythmic control

📊 Outcome Comparison

Pressure tolerance (kg/cm²)

Dry Needling (Pre)
4.87
Dry Needling (Post)
6.52
Control (Pre)
4.67
Control (Post)
5.33
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that dry needling can decrease back pain immediately after treatment and improve how you control your body's balance. Patients were able to tolerate more pressure in the painful area and showed more harmonious movement.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This randomized controlled trial investigated the immediate effects of dry needling in 25 patients with subacute low back pain, a condition that significantly affects quality of life and functional balance. Subacute low back pain, defined as pain persisting from 6 weeks to 3 months, frequently results in altered postural control and reduced body awareness. Dry needling is a therapeutic technique that uses solid filiform needles to treat myofascial trigger points and painful areas, providing pain relief through complex neurobiological mechanisms. In the protocol used, investigators inserted sterile disposable needles into the lumbar paravertebral muscles bilaterally at levels L2 to L5, positioned approximately 2 cm laterally to the spinous processes.

In addition, a third line of needles was inserted into the interspinous spaces from L1–L2 to L4–L5, affecting the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments. Deep insertion technique was used, reaching skin, muscle fascia, ligaments, and muscles, including the multifidus, longissimus lumborum, erector spinae, and iliocostalis lumborum. Results demonstrated significant improvements in two main measures. First, pain tolerance, measured by pressure algometry, increased significantly in the intervention group from 4.87 kg/cm² to 6.52 kg/cm² after treatment.

This increase in pressure tolerance suggests reduced central sensitization and possible release of myofascial trigger points in the lumbar region. Second, during functional balance assessment via mediolateral sway on force platforms, the treated group showed significant improvement in movement quality, with the percentage of signal at the dominant frequency increasing from 43.2% to 54.9%. This change indicates a more controlled and rhythmic movement pattern, suggesting better muscle coordination after treatment. The clinical implications of these findings, in the international context of the study, are relevant for physical therapists and physicians treating patients with low back pain.

Dry needling proved to be an effective intervention for immediate pain relief and improved motor control, and may be incorporated as an adjunctive treatment in conservative management of subacute low back pain. Improvement in functional balance is particularly important, as balance deficits are associated with increased fall risk and functional limitations in daily activities. However, the study has important limitations. The small sample size (n=25) limits generalization of the results.

The evaluation focused only on immediate effects, providing no information about durability of benefits. The absence of a sham-needling placebo group prevents conclusions about specific versus nonspecific effects of the intervention. In addition, balance evaluation considered only center of pressure and ground reaction force, without trunk kinematic analysis. Future research should investigate long-term effects, use larger samples, include adequate placebo groups, and assess specific functional activities of daily living for a better understanding of the full clinical impact of this promising intervention.

Strengths

  • 1Well-structured randomized controlled design
  • 2Standardized and reproducible needling protocol
  • 3Use of objective measures for pain and balance
  • 4Direct clinical application for physical therapists
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Small sample size (n=25)
  • 2Evaluation of immediate effects only
  • 3Absence of sham-needling placebo group
  • 4No assessment of trunk movement or functional activities
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Subacute low back pain — pain persisting between six weeks and three months — represents a critical therapeutic window in clinical practice: the patient has moved past the acute phase but has not yet consolidated a chronic pattern. It is precisely in this interval that interventions targeting the deep musculoskeletal system can modify the trajectory of the disease. The finding of immediate improvement in lumbar paravertebral pressure pain threshold, from 4.87 to 6.52 kg/cm², has direct application in the rehabilitation setting: it allows starting active exercises with a lower pain barrier right after the needling session. The simultaneous improvement in rhythmic control of mediolateral balance is equally relevant, since postural deficits in this population predispose to recurrence and limit load progression in the rehabilitation program. The protocol described — bilateral paravertebral needling from L2 to L5 with an additional line in the interspinous spaces — is reproducible and ready for incorporation into the therapeutic arsenal of a musculoskeletal pain service.

Notable Findings

The most noteworthy aspect of this work is not just the immediate analgesia, which is widely documented in the dry-needling literature, but the quantifiable improvement in postural motor control assessed by force platform. The increase in the percentage of signal at the dominant frequency from 43.2% to 54.9% reflects a more organized and less chaotic mediolateral sway pattern, which translates, in neurophysiological terms, to improved lumbar proprioceptive afference after the intervention. This points to a mechanism that goes beyond simple pain inhibition: deep needling of the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae appears to modulate local sensorimotor processing, possibly through activation of muscle mechanoreceptors and normalization of tone in the treated segments. The combination of analgesic relief measured by pressure algometry with reorganization of postural control in a single intervention protocol is the most clinically integrable finding of this study.

From My Experience

In my musculoskeletal pain practice, the patient profile with subacute low back pain that responds best to paravertebral dry needling is one with palpable focal hypersensitivity in the multifidus, antalgic limitation of lumbar extension, and complaints of instability when walking on uneven ground — exactly the motor-control deficit pattern described in this article. I usually combine dry needling with segmental stabilization exercises starting at the very next session, taking advantage of the lower-pain window to train transversus and multifidus recruitment. The immediate analgesic response I observe is consistent with what Loizidis et al. documented, and generally lasts for 48 to 72 hours after the first sessions. On average, I work with cycles of four to six sessions to consolidate postural control gains before progressing to axial loading. I do not recommend deep paravertebral needling in patients with severe osteoporosis, uncontrolled coagulopathy, or when there is suspicion of an uninvestigated structural pathology — in those cases, diagnostic workup precedes any invasive intervention.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · 2020

DOI: 10.3233/BMR-181265

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.