Auricular acupuncture for pain relief after total hip arthroplasty – a randomized controlled study
Usichenko et al. · Pain · 2005
Evidence Level
STRONGOBJECTIVE
Evaluate whether auriculotherapy reduces analgesic use after total hip replacement surgery
WHO
Patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty
DURATION
3 postoperative days
POINTS
Auricular hip, shenmen, lung, and thalamus points
🔬 Study Design
Auriculotherapy
n=29
Specific auricular points
Control
n=25
Sham points on the auricular helix
📊 Results in numbers
Reduction in opioid use
Piritramide acupuncture group
Piritramide control group
Statistical significance
Percentage highlights
📊 Outcome Comparison
Analgesic consumption (mg)
This study showed that placing small needles at specific points on the ear after hip surgery reduced the need for morphine for pain by 32%. The treatment was safe, and patients could not distinguish between the real and sham treatment.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
**Auricular Acupuncture for Pain Relief After Hip Surgery: A Promising Scientific Study**
Postoperative pain is a constant concern for both patients and health professionals. Even with advances in pain medicine and the use of modern techniques such as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps, many people still experience significant discomfort after surgical procedures. Studies show that approximately 29% of patients still feel moderate pain and 11% feel intense pain even when receiving analgesic treatments considered adequate. In addition, opioid medications used for pain control can cause unpleasant side effects such as nausea, vomiting, itching, and even respiratory depression, which can compromise quality of life during recovery.
It is in this context that complementary techniques such as auricular acupuncture gain interest as alternatives to improve postoperative pain control.
German researchers at Ernst Moritz Arndt University conducted a rigorous study to evaluate whether auricular acupuncture could help reduce the need for pain medications after total hip replacement surgery. The main objective was to compare the efficacy of true auricular acupuncture with a simulated procedure (placebo) in patients undergoing this type of orthopedic surgery. The methodology employed was a randomized controlled clinical trial, considered the gold standard in medical research, in which neither the patients, nor the anesthesiologists, nor the assessors knew which treatment was being applied to each person. Sixty-one patients were initially included in the study and randomly divided into two groups: one received auricular acupuncture at specific points (hip, shenmen, lung, and thalamus) and the other received needles at points not considered acupuncture points.
The permanent needles were placed the day before surgery and maintained for three days after the procedure. The main parameter evaluated was the amount of piritramide (an opioid medication for pain) that patients used through the patient-controlled analgesia pump in the first 36 hours after surgery.
The results were quite encouraging for auricular acupuncture. Fifty-four patients completed the study, with 29 in the true acupuncture group and 25 in the control group. The most important finding was that patients who received auricular acupuncture at the specific points required 32% less pain medication in the first 36 hours after surgery, compared with the control group. Specifically, the acupuncture group used an average of 37 milligrams of piritramide, while the control group used 54 milligrams.
When this result was adjusted for patient body weight, the difference was even greater, reaching 35% reduction in medication use. In addition, patients in the acupuncture group took longer to request the first dose of analgesic after surgery (40 minutes versus 25 minutes in the control group). Considering the entire three-day postoperative period, the total reduction in opioid medication use was 36% in the acupuncture group. It is important to note that, despite using fewer medications, the pain levels reported by patients were similar in both groups, indicating that acupuncture provided additional pain relief without compromising patient comfort.
For patients, these results suggest that auricular acupuncture can be a valuable tool in managing postoperative pain, especially when used as a complement to conventional treatment. The significant reduction in the need for opioid medications is particularly relevant, as it can decrease exposure to the side effects of these medications, such as nausea, drowsiness, and constipation. For health professionals, the study offers scientific evidence that auricular acupuncture can be incorporated into postoperative pain management protocols. The technique proved to be safe, with only a few minor side effects such as small bleeding at the needle site in two patients, local pain in three patients, and headache in one patient.
The procedure is relatively simple to apply and can be performed by trained professionals, with the needles remaining in place for several days without the need for constant manipulation. The ability to maintain adequate levels of pain control while reducing dependence on medications represents an important advance in perioperative medicine.
However, the study has some important limitations that should be considered. The number of patients evaluated, although adequate to detect significant differences, was relatively small (54 patients), which may limit the generalizability of the results. In addition, all participants were of the same ethnicity (Caucasian) and had never previously received acupuncture, factors that may influence the response to treatment. The study was conducted at a single institution in Germany, and the results may vary in different cultural contexts and healthcare systems.
Another point to consider is that the control group also received needles, only at different locations, which may have provided some beneficial effect due to skin stimulation, potentially reducing the difference between groups. The researchers also acknowledge that the use of mechanical rather than electronic pumps for analgesia control limited some analyses. It is essential that future studies be conducted with larger and more diverse populations, in different medical centers, and comparing auricular acupuncture not only with placebo but also with standard treatment alone, to better define its role in routine clinical practice.
Strengths
- 1Well-designed quadruple-blind study
- 2Use of appropriate sham control
- 3Objective outcome (analgesic consumption)
- 4Well-balanced groups
Limitations
- 1Relatively small sample
- 2Only one type of surgery evaluated
- 3Use of mechanical PCA pumps
- 4Sham control may have analgesic effect of its own
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Persistent postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty represents one of the most frequent challenges in the orthopedic perioperative context. Reducing opioid burden in this period is not an aesthetic objective — it is a strategy to reduce nausea, paralytic ileus, excessive sedation, and risk of dependence. The finding by Usichenko and colleagues, with a 32% reduction in piritramide consumption in the first 36 hours, places auriculotherapy as a legitimate adjuvant in multimodal analgesia protocols. The patient profile that benefits most is one with increased risk of opioid adverse effects — elderly, obese, those with obstructive sleep apnea, or with a history of postoperative nausea. The technique of semipermanent needles inserted the day before surgery is operationally feasible in the preanesthetic hospital flow, without interfering with usual surgical protocols, which makes its incorporation into the perioperative analgesic arsenal technically accessible.
▸ Notable Findings
The most robust aspect of this work is the objectivity of the primary endpoint: consumption measured by PCA pump, eliminating the bias of subjective pain self-report. The difference of 37 mg versus 54 mg of piritramide with P = 0.004 confers nontrivial statistical solidity for a sample of 54 patients. Equally relevant is the finding that the time to first analgesic request was longer in the active group — 40 minutes against 25 minutes in the control — suggesting that auriculotherapy prolongs the residual anesthetic effect or modulates the transition to painful awakening. When consumption was corrected for body weight, the difference reached 35%, indicating that the effect is not trivially explainable by differences in body mass between groups. The fact that pain scores were equivalent between groups, despite lower opioid consumption in the active group, suggests that auriculotherapy produces real analgesia, not just reduced perception of medication need.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice in the Acupuncture Group of the HC-FMUSP Pain Center, we have used perioperative auriculotherapy for years, especially in major orthopedic and abdominal surgeries. I have observed that the best responders are anxious patients with low preoperative pain threshold — exactly the profile that requests opioid most in the first hours of recovery. I usually instruct residents to insert semipermanent needles the day before surgery, at the shenmen, thalamus, and the point corresponding to the operated joint, keeping them for 72 hours. The adjuvant analgesic response is usually noticed in the recovery room itself, and the reduction of nausea — a frequent opioid side effect that auriculotherapy also tends to attenuate — adds relevant additional comfort. I do not indicate the technique alone for intense postoperative pain; it integrates a multimodal protocol with conventional analgesia. Patients who report previous negative experiences with needles require specific preparation so as not to compromise adherence to the auricular dressing.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Pain · 2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.08.021
Access original articleThis study underpins the editorial content of the site.
Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.
Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories