acupuntura.com
LibraryAtlas
ExercisesNews
LibraryAtlas
ExercisesNews
acupuntura.com

Evidence-based medical acupuncture, physician-led at CEIMEC.

NAVIGATION

HomeArticlesConditionsAtlasMusclesExercises

CONTENT

NewsLibraryGuidesMultimodal

PATIENTS

SymptomsPain MapConditionsFAQFirst Session

INSTITUTIONAL

AboutTeamCEIMECWhy Trust Us

LEGAL

Editorial PolicyPrivacyTerms of UseLegal Notice

RESOURCE

Free Resource

No ads · No paywalls

01 · IDIOMA · LANGUAGE

Disponível em outras línguas

Disponible en otros idiomas

Available in other languages

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai·Physician Acupuncturist

DISCLAIMER Information on acupuntura.com is educational and does not replace consultation with a qualified physician. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have.

acupuntura.com · 2025–2026Last reviewed: 2026-05-04
Back to News
ResearchFull Analysis
April 19, 2026
6 min reading time

Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for Episodic Migraine Prevention: Network Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials

Network meta-analysis with 9,123 participants compares galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab: fremanezumab 225 mg offers the best balance of efficacy and safety, while galcanezumab 240 mg leads in effect magnitude.

Source: European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology(in English)DOI: 10.1007/s00228-025-03934-3
Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for Episodic Migraine Prevention: Network Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials

Episodic migraine affects approximately 12% of the world population and represents the second leading cause of disability in years lived with disability, according to the World Health Organization. The arrival of anti-CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) monoclonal antibodies represented a revolution in prophylaxis — but the absence of head-to-head studies between the three approved agents made individualized therapeutic choice difficult. A network meta-analysis published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology filled this gap, systematically analyzing galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab from 16 randomized clinical trials and 9,123 participants.

The main conclusion is that, although the three agents are superior to placebo, there are relevant differences in efficacy and safety profile: fremanezumab 225 mg offers the best balance between efficacy and tolerability, galcanezumab 240 mg presents the largest gross effect magnitude, and erenumab 28 mg stands out for the most favorable safety profile.

The anti-CGRP mechanism: modulating the trigeminal pain pathway

CGRP is a vasoactive neuropeptide released from trigeminal nerve endings during a migraine attack. It promotes meningeal vasodilation, neurogenic inflammation, and peripheral sensitization of perivascular nociceptive fibers. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies block this signal in two ways: galcanezumab and fremanezumab bind directly to the CGRP ligand, while erenumabblocks the CGRP-R receptor. Both approaches interrupt the trigeminal inflammatory cascade without the systemic effects of older oral preventives (topiramate, valproate, propranolol).

WHY NETWORK META-ANALYSIS?

Network meta-analyses (NMA) allow indirect comparisons between treatments that have never been tested directly against each other in the same trial. In this case, since there are no published head-to-head trials comparing galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab, the NMA uses transitive evidence: if A > placebo and B > placebo, the NMA estimates A vs. B based on the effect sizes of each comparison with the common control (placebo). This offers a clinically useful ranking, although with greater uncertainty than a direct comparison.

Methodology: 16 trials, three molecules, 9,123 patients

The review by Shakir I et al. (2026) included 16 double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials, totaling 9,123 participants with episodic migraine (4 to 14 migraine days per month). The primary outcomes were:

Outcomes evaluated in the network meta-analysis

  • Reduction in the number of monthly migraine days — continuous measure (SMD)
  • Response rate ≥ 50% in the reduction of migraine days per month — dichotomous measure (OR)
  • Safety profile: any-grade adverse events vs. placebo (OR)
  • Comparisons by specific dose: galcanezumab 120 mg and 240 mg, fremanezumab 225 mg and 675 mg, erenumab 28 mg and 70 mg and 140 mg

ANTI-CGRP FOR EPISODIC MIGRAINE — MAIN DATA

SMD 0.50
GALCANEZUMAB 240 MG — HIGHEST GROSS EFFICACY
SMD = 0.5012 (p < 0.0001) · largest absolute reduction in migraine days
OR 3.17
FREMANEZUMAB 225 MG — HIGHEST ≥ 50% RESPONSE RATE
OR = 3.1684 (p < 0.0001) · 3× more likely to achieve clinically relevant response vs. placebo
OR 0.68
ERENUMAB 28 MG — BEST SAFETY PROFILE
OR = 0.6815 (p = 0.22) · lowest risk of adverse events among the agents evaluated
9,123
PARTICIPANTS IN 16 RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
Episodic migraine (4-14 days/month) · period 2017-2025

Comparison among the three agents

GALCANEZUMAB VS. FREMANEZUMAB VS. ERENUMAB

AGENT / DOSEEFFICACY AND SAFETY PROFILE
Galcanezumab 240 mg (monthly)Highest absolute efficacy (SMD = 0.50) · Monthly subcutaneous administration · autoinjection available
Fremanezumab 225 mg (monthly) or 675 mg (quarterly)Best efficacy-safety balance · OR = 3.17 for response ≥ 50% · only one with quarterly option
Erenumab 70-140 mg (monthly)Best safety profile (OR = 0.68) · blocks receptor (not the ligand) · may increase constipation

The authors conclude that fremanezumab offers the best balance between efficacy and safety, considering simultaneously the clinical response rate and tolerability. For patients in whom maximizing efficacy is a priority, galcanezumab 240 mg demonstrated the largest effect magnitude. For those with a history of adverse events or tolerability concerns, erenumab presented the most favorable profile.

PRACTICE CONTEXT

  • The FDA, EMA, and other major drug regulatory agencies have approved galcanezumab (Emgality), fremanezumab (Ajovy), and erenumab (Aimovig) for prophylaxis of episodic and chronic migraine in adults
  • Public health systems and insurance coverage vary by country — monthly cost can be significant for continuous out-of-pocket use
  • For patients with moderate to severe migraine frequency and failure of at least two oral preventives, these agents represent a second-line alternative with a safety profile superior to older orals
  • Medical acupuncture constitutes a non-pharmacologic alternative with growing evidence for episodic migraine prophylaxis — it can be used alone or in combination with pharmacologic treatment

STUDY LIMITATIONS

  • Indirect comparisons (NMA) carry inherent uncertainty — the absence of head-to-head trials between the three agents limits the precision of estimates
  • Heterogeneity between studies regarding included population (varied inclusion criteria, baseline migraine frequency)
  • Long-term outcomes (> 12 months) and discontinuation — relevant in practice — were not systematically evaluated
  • Absence of data on subgroups (aura, sex, prior response to other preventives) that could guide individualized choice
  • All included trials were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry — risk of publication bias and effect inflation
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS · 05

Frequently Asked Questions

All three are humanized monoclonal antibodies that block the CGRP pathway, but in distinct ways. Galcanezumab and fremanezumab bind directly to the CGRP peptide, preventing it from acting on its receptors. Erenumab, in contrast, blocks the CGRP-R receptor — therefore, it does not interfere with CGRP function in other tissues where it is released in response to physical activity or stress, which may explain the differentiated safety profile. In practice, the three molecules have comparable efficacy, with the quantitative differences revealed by this network meta-analysis.

International guidelines (AHS, EAN) and approvals from major drug regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, and others) indicate anti-CGRP antibodies for adults with episodic migraine (≥ 4 days/month) or chronic migraine (≥ 15 days/month with migraine features) who have presented failure or intolerance to at least two conventional oral preventives (topiramate, valproate, propranolol, amitriptyline, venlafaxine).

Coverage varies by country and program. In many jurisdictions, anti-CGRP antibodies are not on essential-medicines lists and are accessed through specialty pharmacies with significant monthly cost. In countries where they are covered, access often requires prior authorization with documented failure of conventional oral preventives.

Yes. There is no known contraindication to the combination. Medical acupuncture has independent evidence for episodic migraine prophylaxis — recent meta-analyses (including a study published in JAMA Neurology) demonstrate significant reduction in attack frequency. In patients in whom the cost or availability of anti-CGRP is limiting, acupuncture constitutes a non-pharmacologic first-line alternative. In patients already on anti-CGRP, acupuncture can be used as adjunctive therapy to optimize control.

Guidelines suggest a minimum of 6 to 12 months of treatment before considering discontinuation, with periodic assessment of response. Extension studies show that a significant portion of responders maintain benefit after suspension, possibly due to modification of the central sensitization state. The decision to continue or stop should be individualized, considering clinical response, cost, and patient preferences.

Sources consulted

  • Shakir I, Shahzad F, Shabbir A, et al. Efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention in episodic migraine: a network meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2026;82(2):27. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-025-03934-3.
  • Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies — successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018.
  • Diener HC, Tassorelli C, Dodick DW, et al. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. 2020.
  • Zhao L, Chen J, Li Y, et al. The long-term effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for migraine prevention. JAMA Intern Med. 2017.
  • FDA labels for Emgality (galcanezumab), Ajovy (fremanezumab), and Aimovig (erenumab). U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2018-2024.

Fonte Original

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology(em inglês)

Estudo Científico

DOI: 10.1007/s00228-025-03934-3
Content prepared by
CEIMEC — Centro de Estudo Integrado de Medicina Chinesa

Founded in 1989 by physicians trained at the University of São Paulo (USP) and specialized in China, CEIMEC is a Brazilian national reference in the teaching and practice of medical acupuncture. With more than 3,000 physicians trained over 35 years, it collaborates with HC-FMUSP and is recognized by the Brazilian Medical College of Acupuncture (CMBA/AMB).

Published on 2026-04-19
All News