Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Endometriosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Li et al. · Journal of Pain Research · 2024
Evidence Level
MODERATEOBJECTIVE
Compare different acupuncture therapies for the treatment of endometriosis through network meta-analysis
WHO
3,656 women with endometriosis across 42 randomized clinical trials
DURATION
Treatments ranged from 2 weeks to 12 months
POINTS
Guanyuan (CV-4), Sanyinjiao (SP-6), Zhongji (CV-3), Zigong (EX-CA-1), among other specific points
🔬 Study Design
Acupuncture
n=520
Manual acupuncture
Electroacupuncture
n=160
Acupuncture with electrical stimulation
Moxibustion
n=280
Heat therapy with mugwort (Artemisia)
Auriculotherapy
n=190
Stimulation of auricular points
Catgut embedding
n=385
Implantation of catgut suture into acupoints
Acupoint application
n=67
Application of herbs at acupoints
Combined therapy
n=1254
Combination of acupuncture techniques
Western medicine
n=800
Conventional hormonal treatment
📊 Results in numbers
Pain reduction (VAS) with acupuncture vs. Western medicine
Pain reduction with combined therapy vs. Western medicine
CA-125 reduction with acupoint application vs. Western medicine
Response rate with auriculotherapy vs. Western medicine
📊 Outcome Comparison
Pain Reduction (VAS)
CA-125 Reduction
This study showed that different acupuncture techniques are effective in reducing endometriosis pain. Catgut embedding (suture implantation) was most effective for pain, while auriculotherapy had the best overall results. These therapies had fewer side effects compared with conventional hormonal medications.
Article summary
Plain-language narrative summary
This network meta-analysis represents the most comprehensive study to date on acupuncture-related therapies for endometriosis, analyzing 42 randomized clinical trials with 3,656 participants. Endometriosis is a gynecologic condition that affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age, characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, causing intense pain and significant impact on quality of life. Conventional treatment with hormonal medications often causes side effects that lead 10-43% of patients to discontinue treatment. The researchers conducted a systematic search of eight databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, plus Chinese databases, covering publications from inception through April 2024.
The study included six main acupuncture interventions: manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, moxibustion, auriculotherapy, catgut embedding (catgut suture implantation), and acupoint application, plus combined therapies. Primary outcomes were pain scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), serum CA-125 levels (an endometriosis marker), and clinical response rates. The methodology used Bayesian analysis to compare different treatments directly and indirectly, allowing therapy ranking by efficacy. Quality assessment followed Cochrane guidelines, with most studies showing low risk of bias for random sequence generation and selective reporting.
The results demonstrated consistent superiority of acupuncture therapies over Western medicine. For pain reduction, catgut embedding obtained the best ranking (76.8% probability of being the most effective), followed by acupoint application (70.1%) and manual acupuncture (66.6%). Manual acupuncture showed significant pain reduction compared with Western medicine (MD: -2.33; 95% CI: -4.37, -0.29). For CA-125 levels, acupoint application was most effective (ranking 86.3%), demonstrating significant reduction compared with Western medicine (MD: -11.86; 95% CI: -18.81, -4.86).
Combined therapy also showed superiority over Chinese and Western medicine in multiple outcomes. As for response rates, auriculotherapy obtained the best performance (93.2% probability), with an odds ratio of 8.01 (95% CI: 2.08, 45.37) compared with Western medicine. Safety analysis revealed a lower incidence of adverse events with acupuncture therapies. Of the 42 studies, only 7 reported adverse events, with acupuncture therapies mainly causing mild subcutaneous bruising and occasional dizziness, while hormonal medications caused irregular vaginal bleeding, nausea, headache, and breast discomfort.
The clinical implications are substantial, suggesting that acupuncture therapies offer effective and safer alternatives to conventional treatment. Catgut embedding, which involves implanting biodegradable threads into acupoints for prolonged stimulation, emerged as particularly promising for pain management. Auriculotherapy, with its ease of application and excellent overall results, represents an accessible option for many patients. Limitations include heterogeneity in treatment protocols, variable study duration, and predominance of Chinese participants, limiting global generalization.
In addition, the impossibility of complete blinding in acupuncture studies may introduce performance bias. Many studies also did not specify the qualifications of the acupuncturists or standardized protocols. The 'combined therapy' classification grouped different combinations, preventing specific analysis of the best combined protocols. This study provides robust evidence for integrating acupuncture therapies into the management of endometriosis, especially for patients who do not tolerate or prefer to avoid hormonal treatments.
The results support the development of clinical guidelines that include these therapies as first-line or adjunctive options. Future research should focus on protocol standardization, international multicenter studies, and direct comparisons among different acupuncture techniques to establish the most effective combinations for different clinical presentations of endometriosis.
Strengths
- 1Most comprehensive network meta-analysis on acupuncture for endometriosis
- 2Large sample of 3,656 participants from 42 studies
- 3Comparative analysis of multiple acupuncture techniques
- 4Robust Bayesian methodology for indirect comparisons
- 5Low risk of bias in most included studies
Limitations
- 1Heterogeneity in treatment protocols and duration
- 2Predominance of Chinese participants limiting generalization
- 3Inability to fully blind acupuncture studies
- 4Lack of standardization in acupuncturists' qualifications
- 5Grouping of combined therapies preventing specific analysis
Expert Commentary
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai
PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo
▸ Clinical Relevance
Endometriosis affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age and represents one of the most arduous therapeutic challenges in gynecology, precisely because the conventional arsenal—GnRH analogs, progestins, combined contraceptives—carries an adverse-effect profile that leads between 10% and 43% of patients to abandon treatment. This work, with 3,656 participants in 42 randomized trials, offers the most systematic comparison available between acupuncture techniques and hormonal therapy for pain control and reduction of the CA-125 marker. The results position manual acupuncture, catgut embedding, and auriculotherapy as clinically viable alternatives, whether as monotherapy in patients refractory to or intolerant of hormones, or as an adjunctive strategy for hormonal dose reduction. The most immediate application setting is the young patient with confirmed endometriosis, severe dysmenorrhea, and a desire to preserve fertility, in whom prolonged hormonal manipulation is undesirable.
▸ Notable Findings
Three findings deserve special attention. First, the magnitude of pain reduction with manual acupuncture compared with Western medicine reached a standardized mean difference of -2.33 points on the VAS—a value that exceeds the minimum clinically relevant threshold accepted in the pain literature. Second, auriculotherapy obtained an odds ratio of 8.01 for overall clinical response rate, surprising performance for a technique considered adjunctive in many services. Third, acupoint application with herbs demonstrated a -11.86 reduction in serum CA-125 compared with conventional treatment, suggesting that the action is not only analgesic but potentially anti-inflammatory and modulatory of the peritoneal microenvironment. Catgut embedding, by promoting continuous acupuncture stimulation for weeks via biodegradable suture, emerged as the best-ranked for pain, with 76.8% probability of superiority—a mechanism that may be explained by prolonged activation of A-delta and C fibers and central modulation of nociception.
▸ From My Experience
In my practice at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, I have followed women with endometriosis for decades, and the trajectory of these patients is invariably marked by accumulated therapeutic frustrations. I usually start manual acupuncture twice weekly during the first four weeks and, in the overwhelming majority of cases, perceptible analgesic response occurs between the third and fifth sessions. After the intensive phase, we move to monthly or premenstrual maintenance, which is usually sufficient to keep pain under control. Auriculotherapy, whose performance in this meta-analysis pleasantly surprised me, I already use as an adjunct between body acupuncture sessions, and the synergistic result is consistent with what the data here suggest. The profile that responds best, in my observation, is the patient with predominantly cyclic pain, without major non-cyclic chronic pelvic pain—the latter requires a more robust multidisciplinary approach and gains are sometimes more modest. Catgut embedding, although technically more demanding and less widespread in Brazil, is a technique that deserves growing attention precisely because of the prolonged-stimulation data that this work corroborates.
Full original article
Read the full scientific study
Journal of Pain Research · 2024
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S488343
Access original articleScientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD
CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241
PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.
Learn more about the author →Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.
Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.
Related articles
Based on this article’s categories