Skip to content

Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Endometriosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Li et al. · Journal of Pain Research · 2024

🔗Network Meta-Analysis👥n=3,656 participants🌟Moderate Evidence

Evidence Level

MODERATE
72/ 100
Quality
3/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

Compare different acupuncture therapies for the treatment of endometriosis through network meta-analysis

👥

WHO

3,656 women with endometriosis across 42 randomized clinical trials

⏱️

DURATION

Treatments ranged from 2 weeks to 12 months

📍

POINTS

Guanyuan (CV-4), Sanyinjiao (SP-6), Zhongji (CV-3), Zigong (EX-CA-1), among other specific points

🔬 Study Design

3656participants
randomization

Acupuncture

n=520

Manual acupuncture

Electroacupuncture

n=160

Acupuncture with electrical stimulation

Moxibustion

n=280

Heat therapy with mugwort (Artemisia)

Auriculotherapy

n=190

Stimulation of auricular points

Catgut embedding

n=385

Implantation of catgut suture into acupoints

Acupoint application

n=67

Application of herbs at acupoints

Combined therapy

n=1254

Combination of acupuncture techniques

Western medicine

n=800

Conventional hormonal treatment

⏱️ Duration: 2 weeks to 12 months

📊 Results in numbers

0

Pain reduction (VAS) with acupuncture vs. Western medicine

0

Pain reduction with combined therapy vs. Western medicine

0

CA-125 reduction with acupoint application vs. Western medicine

0

Response rate with auriculotherapy vs. Western medicine

📊 Outcome Comparison

Pain Reduction (VAS)

Catgut Embedding
77
Acupoint Application
70
Acupuncture
67
Western Medicine
10

CA-125 Reduction

Acupoint Application
86
Combined Therapy
80
Acupuncture
46
Moxibustion
17
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that different acupuncture techniques are effective in reducing endometriosis pain. Catgut embedding (suture implantation) was most effective for pain, while auriculotherapy had the best overall results. These therapies had fewer side effects compared with conventional hormonal medications.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This network meta-analysis represents the most comprehensive study to date on acupuncture-related therapies for endometriosis, analyzing 42 randomized clinical trials with 3,656 participants. Endometriosis is a gynecologic condition that affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age, characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, causing intense pain and significant impact on quality of life. Conventional treatment with hormonal medications often causes side effects that lead 10-43% of patients to discontinue treatment. The researchers conducted a systematic search of eight databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, plus Chinese databases, covering publications from inception through April 2024.

The study included six main acupuncture interventions: manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, moxibustion, auriculotherapy, catgut embedding (catgut suture implantation), and acupoint application, plus combined therapies. Primary outcomes were pain scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), serum CA-125 levels (an endometriosis marker), and clinical response rates. The methodology used Bayesian analysis to compare different treatments directly and indirectly, allowing therapy ranking by efficacy. Quality assessment followed Cochrane guidelines, with most studies showing low risk of bias for random sequence generation and selective reporting.

The results demonstrated consistent superiority of acupuncture therapies over Western medicine. For pain reduction, catgut embedding obtained the best ranking (76.8% probability of being the most effective), followed by acupoint application (70.1%) and manual acupuncture (66.6%). Manual acupuncture showed significant pain reduction compared with Western medicine (MD: -2.33; 95% CI: -4.37, -0.29). For CA-125 levels, acupoint application was most effective (ranking 86.3%), demonstrating significant reduction compared with Western medicine (MD: -11.86; 95% CI: -18.81, -4.86).

Combined therapy also showed superiority over Chinese and Western medicine in multiple outcomes. As for response rates, auriculotherapy obtained the best performance (93.2% probability), with an odds ratio of 8.01 (95% CI: 2.08, 45.37) compared with Western medicine. Safety analysis revealed a lower incidence of adverse events with acupuncture therapies. Of the 42 studies, only 7 reported adverse events, with acupuncture therapies mainly causing mild subcutaneous bruising and occasional dizziness, while hormonal medications caused irregular vaginal bleeding, nausea, headache, and breast discomfort.

The clinical implications are substantial, suggesting that acupuncture therapies offer effective and safer alternatives to conventional treatment. Catgut embedding, which involves implanting biodegradable threads into acupoints for prolonged stimulation, emerged as particularly promising for pain management. Auriculotherapy, with its ease of application and excellent overall results, represents an accessible option for many patients. Limitations include heterogeneity in treatment protocols, variable study duration, and predominance of Chinese participants, limiting global generalization.

In addition, the impossibility of complete blinding in acupuncture studies may introduce performance bias. Many studies also did not specify the qualifications of the acupuncturists or standardized protocols. The 'combined therapy' classification grouped different combinations, preventing specific analysis of the best combined protocols. This study provides robust evidence for integrating acupuncture therapies into the management of endometriosis, especially for patients who do not tolerate or prefer to avoid hormonal treatments.

The results support the development of clinical guidelines that include these therapies as first-line or adjunctive options. Future research should focus on protocol standardization, international multicenter studies, and direct comparisons among different acupuncture techniques to establish the most effective combinations for different clinical presentations of endometriosis.

Strengths

  • 1Most comprehensive network meta-analysis on acupuncture for endometriosis
  • 2Large sample of 3,656 participants from 42 studies
  • 3Comparative analysis of multiple acupuncture techniques
  • 4Robust Bayesian methodology for indirect comparisons
  • 5Low risk of bias in most included studies
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Heterogeneity in treatment protocols and duration
  • 2Predominance of Chinese participants limiting generalization
  • 3Inability to fully blind acupuncture studies
  • 4Lack of standardization in acupuncturists' qualifications
  • 5Grouping of combined therapies preventing specific analysis
Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

Expert Commentary

Prof. Dr. Hong Jin Pai

PhD in Sciences, University of São Paulo

Clinical Relevance

Endometriosis affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age and represents one of the most arduous therapeutic challenges in gynecology, precisely because the conventional arsenal—GnRH analogs, progestins, combined contraceptives—carries an adverse-effect profile that leads between 10% and 43% of patients to abandon treatment. This work, with 3,656 participants in 42 randomized trials, offers the most systematic comparison available between acupuncture techniques and hormonal therapy for pain control and reduction of the CA-125 marker. The results position manual acupuncture, catgut embedding, and auriculotherapy as clinically viable alternatives, whether as monotherapy in patients refractory to or intolerant of hormones, or as an adjunctive strategy for hormonal dose reduction. The most immediate application setting is the young patient with confirmed endometriosis, severe dysmenorrhea, and a desire to preserve fertility, in whom prolonged hormonal manipulation is undesirable.

Notable Findings

Three findings deserve special attention. First, the magnitude of pain reduction with manual acupuncture compared with Western medicine reached a standardized mean difference of -2.33 points on the VAS—a value that exceeds the minimum clinically relevant threshold accepted in the pain literature. Second, auriculotherapy obtained an odds ratio of 8.01 for overall clinical response rate, surprising performance for a technique considered adjunctive in many services. Third, acupoint application with herbs demonstrated a -11.86 reduction in serum CA-125 compared with conventional treatment, suggesting that the action is not only analgesic but potentially anti-inflammatory and modulatory of the peritoneal microenvironment. Catgut embedding, by promoting continuous acupuncture stimulation for weeks via biodegradable suture, emerged as the best-ranked for pain, with 76.8% probability of superiority—a mechanism that may be explained by prolonged activation of A-delta and C fibers and central modulation of nociception.

From My Experience

In my practice at the Pain Center of HC-FMUSP, I have followed women with endometriosis for decades, and the trajectory of these patients is invariably marked by accumulated therapeutic frustrations. I usually start manual acupuncture twice weekly during the first four weeks and, in the overwhelming majority of cases, perceptible analgesic response occurs between the third and fifth sessions. After the intensive phase, we move to monthly or premenstrual maintenance, which is usually sufficient to keep pain under control. Auriculotherapy, whose performance in this meta-analysis pleasantly surprised me, I already use as an adjunct between body acupuncture sessions, and the synergistic result is consistent with what the data here suggest. The profile that responds best, in my observation, is the patient with predominantly cyclic pain, without major non-cyclic chronic pelvic pain—the latter requires a more robust multidisciplinary approach and gains are sometimes more modest. Catgut embedding, although technically more demanding and less widespread in Brazil, is a technique that deserves growing attention precisely because of the prolonged-stimulation data that this work corroborates.

Specialist physician in Medical Acupuncture. Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Orthopedics, HC-FMUSP. Coordinator of the Acupuncture Group at the HC-FMUSP Pain Center.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Journal of Pain Research · 2024

DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S488343

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.