Skip to content

Acupuncture for Treating Acute Attacks of Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Li et al. · Headache · 2009

🎲Multicenter RCT👥n=175High Quality

Evidence Level

MODERATE
78/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether true acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture in treating acute migraine attacks

👥

WHO

175 patients with a diagnosis of migraine with or without aura during an acute attack

⏱️

DURATION

One treatment session with 24-hour observation

📍

POINTS

Waiguan (TE-5), Yanglingquan (GB-34), Qiuxu (GB-40), Jiaosun (TE-20) and Fengchi (GB-20)

🔬 Study Design

175participants
randomization

True acupuncture

n=58

Needling at real points with de qi

Sham acupuncture 1

n=60

Needling at non-points between meridians

Sham acupuncture 2

n=57

Needling at non-points distant from meridians

⏱️ Duration: 24 hours of observation

📊 Results in numbers

0.7 cm

Pain reduction (2nd hour) - true acupuncture

1.0 cm

Pain reduction (4th hour) - true acupuncture

0%

Complete pain relief

0%

No relapse or worsening

0%

Adverse event rate

Percentage highlights

40.7%
Complete pain relief
79.6%
No relapse or worsening
5.1%
Adverse event rate

📊 Outcome Comparison

VAS reduction after 4 hours

True acupuncture
1
Sham 1
0.5
Sham 2
0.1
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study demonstrated that true acupuncture, using specific points traditionally used for migraine, was superior to sham acupuncture in reducing pain during acute migraine attacks. Patients who received real acupuncture had greater pain relief, especially at 2 and 4 hours after treatment, with low risk of adverse effects.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Acupuncture has been used for centuries in traditional Chinese medicine to treat various types of pain, including migraine. However, until recently, scientific evidence on its efficacy in the specific treatment of acute migraine attacks was limited and inconsistent. Some previous studies had suggested that true acupuncture was not more effective than sham procedures, raising questions about whether the observed benefits were real or merely the result of the placebo effect. Migraine is a debilitating condition that affects millions of people worldwide, causing intense pain that is often pulsatile and unilateral, accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and sensitivity to light and sound.

Beyond personal suffering, migraine generates significant costs for the health system and negatively impacts patients' quality of life.

This study was conducted as a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China, involving seven hospitals. The primary objective was to investigate whether true acupuncture would be more effective than sham acupuncture in relieving pain during acute migraine attacks. The researchers recruited 218 patients with confirmed migraine diagnosis, of whom 175 were effectively included and randomized into three groups. The first group received true acupuncture at specific points traditionally used for migraine, while the other two groups received sham acupuncture at points not considered therapeutic in traditional Chinese medicine.

Each patient received only one treatment session and was followed for 24 hours. The main assessment method was the Visual Analog Pain Scale, a widely used tool that allows the patient to quantify their pain on a scale from 0 to 10 centimeters. Measurements were performed before treatment and at intervals of 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours after the procedure.

The results demonstrated that true acupuncture was significantly more effective than sham acupuncture in reducing pain. In the first two hours after treatment, only patients who received true acupuncture showed significant pain reduction, with a median decrease of 0.7 centimeters on the pain scale. At the fourth hour after treatment, although all groups showed some improvement, the true acupuncture group showed much greater reduction, with a median decrease of 1.0 centimeter on the pain scale, compared to only 0.5 centimeter in the first sham acupuncture group and 0.1 centimeter in the second sham group. In addition to pain reduction, the researchers observed that patients treated with true acupuncture had superior outcomes in other important aspects: 40.7% experienced complete pain relief, and 79.6% had no recurrence or intensification of pain in the 24 hours following treatment.

For patients suffering from frequent migraine, these results offer solid scientific evidence that acupuncture may be an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute attacks. Acupuncture proved capable not only of reducing pain intensity but also of preventing symptom recurrence in the short term. For health professionals, the study provides important data that can assist in clinical decision-making, especially for patients seeking alternatives to conventional medications or who do not adequately respond to pharmacologic treatments. The results also suggest that there is a real physiological difference between traditional acupuncture points and nonspecific points, contradicting theories that attribute the effects of acupuncture exclusively to placebo effect.

It is important to consider some study limitations when interpreting its results. The study assessed only one treatment session, not reflecting the usual clinical practice in which multiple sessions are generally performed. In addition, follow-up was limited to 24 hours, not allowing assessment of long-term effects. The study was also not completely blinded, as patients could potentially identify whether they were receiving true or sham acupuncture during treatment.

Adverse events were rare and mild, including isolated episodes of fainting, minor bleeding, and local pain, all with rapid recovery. Despite these limitations, this study represents a significant contribution to the scientific literature on acupuncture, providing robust evidence of its efficacy in treating acute migraine attacks and paving the way for future research on longer-duration treatments and their long-term effects.

Strengths

  • 1Multicenter study with good methodological quality
  • 2Adequate centralized randomization
  • 3Relatively large sample
  • 4Comparison with two types of sham control
  • 5Low adverse event rate
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Limited blinding due to characteristics of the procedure
  • 2Only one baseline measurement before randomization
  • 3Short follow-up duration (24 hours)
  • 4Significant difference in disease duration between groups
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Management of acute migraine attacks remains a real clinical challenge—a significant portion of patients does not tolerate triptans due to cardiovascular contraindications, has insufficient response to conventional analgesics, or develops medication-overuse headache. This trial, with 175 patients distributed in three arms and conducted at seven centers, offers concrete data to support acupuncture as a rescue option in acute attacks. The findings apply directly to the patient who comes to the pain clinic with refractory attacks or pharmacologic contraindications, and also to the emergency setting where rapid pain reduction without medication burden is sought. The 40.7% complete relief rate in a single session is clinically relevant and credentials the technique as an adjuvant or primary alternative in selected profiles, especially in patients with episodic migraine without complex comorbidities.

Notable Findings

The most striking finding is not the absolute reduction on VAS—which, in isolation, would be modest—but rather the combination of complete relief in 40.7% of cases and absence of relapse or worsening in 79.6% within the subsequent 24 hours, both with a single session. This suggests that the effect of true acupuncture transcends immediate analgesia and acts on mechanisms that modulate the propagation and reinstatement of the attack, possibly via descending pain inhibition and trigeminovascular modulation. Another notable finding is the statistically significant superiority already at the second hour, when both sham groups still did not show consistent reduction—this temporal pattern distinguishes the specific neurophysiologic effect from mere placebo. The performance difference between the two sham controls (non-points near vs distant from meridians) also points to a topographic specificity that deserves attention in future studies.

From My Experience

In my practice in the pain and rehabilitation clinic, I have used acupuncture as a rescue resource in patients with migraine for more than two decades, and the response pattern described in this trial is quite consistent with what I observe routinely. In an acute session, I usually see perceptible pain reduction between 30 and 60 minutes, with peak response at the second hour—exactly what the study documents. For prophylaxis and attack frequency control, I work with cycles of 8 to 12 sessions, reviewing the point protocol every four sessions according to evolution. The profile that best responds to acute treatment in my service is the patient with migraine without aura, moderate-intensity pain at the start of the session, and no recent use of analgesics that day. I usually combine it with cervical muscle relaxation techniques and postural guidance, given that a large portion of patients exhibits upper trapezius hyperactivity as a triggering factor. I avoid indicating acupuncture for an attack with intense autonomic symptoms or suspected associated hypertensive crisis, where immediate medical evaluation has absolute priority.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

Headache · 2009

DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01424.x

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.