Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised trial

Witt et al. · Lancet · 2005

🏥3-arm RCT👥n=294High impact

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
5/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of true acupuncture with sham acupuncture and no treatment in knee osteoarthritis

👥

WHO

294 patients (50-75 years) with knee osteoarthritis grade ≥2 and pain ≥40/100

⏱️

DURATION

8 weeks of treatment (12 sessions) with follow-up through 52 weeks

📍

POINTS

Local points (ST-34, ST-35, ST-36, SP-9, SP-10, BL-40) and distal points, individualized by TCM

🔬 Study Design

294participants
randomization

True acupuncture

n=150

12 sessions of needling at traditional acupuncture points

Sham acupuncture

n=76

Superficial needling at non-acupuncture points distant from the knee

Waiting list

n=74

No treatment for 8 weeks, then true acupuncture

⏱️ Duration: 8 weeks of treatment

📊 Results in numbers

-8.8 points

WOMAC index at week 8 (acupuncture vs sham)

-22.7 points

WOMAC index at week 8 (acupuncture vs control)

0%

Responders (≥50% WOMAC improvement) - acupuncture

0%

Responders (≥50% WOMAC improvement) - sham

Percentage highlights

52%
Responders (≥50% WOMAC improvement) - acupuncture
28%
Responders (≥50% WOMAC improvement) - sham

📊 Outcome Comparison

WOMAC index at week 8 (baseline-adjusted)

Acupuncture
26.9
Sham acupuncture
35.8
Waiting list
49.6
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study demonstrated that true acupuncture was significantly more effective than sham acupuncture and much superior to no treatment in reducing pain and improving knee function in patients with osteoarthritis. However, the benefits diminished over time, suggesting that booster sessions may be needed.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

Acupuncture has been used for thousands of years for pain treatment, but its efficacy for knee osteoarthritis was still generating doubts within the medical community. Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most common conditions affecting joints, causing intense pain and movement limitation. Conventional treatments include anti-inflammatory medications, which can cause serious side effects such as gastrointestinal bleeding, and joint replacement surgery in the most severe cases. Faced with this reality, many patients seek alternatives such as acupuncture, but until then there was a lack of robust studies that scientifically demonstrated its efficacy.

This study was designed to investigate whether true acupuncture is more effective than minimal acupuncture (placebo) or no treatment in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The research was conducted between March 2002 and January 2003, enrolling 294 patients aged 50 to 75 years, all with confirmed diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: 150 received true acupuncture, 76 received minimal acupuncture, and 74 remained on a waiting list without treatment. True acupuncture followed Traditional Chinese Medicine principles, with needles inserted at specific points related to the knee and at distal points.

Minimal acupuncture used superficial needles at points unrelated to traditional acupuncture, serving as placebo control. Both treatments consisted of 12 sessions of 30 minutes over 8 weeks. The main improvement indicator was the WOMAC Index, which assesses pain, stiffness, and physical function related to osteoarthritis.

Results demonstrated significant benefits of true acupuncture after 8 weeks of treatment. On the WOMAC Index, true acupuncture obtained a score of 26.9 points, compared with 35.8 points for minimal acupuncture and 49.6 points for the untreated group (the lower the score, the better the outcome). This means that patients who received true acupuncture experienced less pain and better joint function. The proportion of patients who had at least 50% improvement was striking: 52% in the true acupuncture group, against only 28% in minimal acupuncture and 3% in the untreated group.

In addition, there was a reduction in pain medication use and improvement in overall quality of life. Side effects were minimal, mainly limited to small bruises at the needle insertion site.

For patients with knee osteoarthritis, these results offer solid scientific evidence that acupuncture can be an effective treatment option. The significant improvement in pain and joint function may represent an important alternative to anti-inflammatory medications, especially for those who cannot use them due to side effects or contraindications. For healthcare professionals, the study provides a scientific basis for considering acupuncture as an integral part of knee osteoarthritis treatment. The demonstrated safety, with minimal adverse effects, makes acupuncture an attractive option for patients seeking less invasive treatments.

However, it is important that acupuncture be performed by duly qualified and trained professionals.

The study presents some important limitations that should be considered. The main concerning finding was that the benefits of acupuncture diminished over time, and after 26 and 52 weeks there was no longer a significant difference between true and minimal acupuncture. This suggests that the effects of acupuncture may be temporary and that booster treatments may be needed to maintain long-term benefits. Another limitation was that many participants were recruited through newspapers, which may not represent all types of patients with knee osteoarthritis.

In addition, although patients did not know which type of treatment they were receiving, acupuncturists obviously did, which could influence results. Despite these limitations, this study represents a valuable contribution to evidence-based medicine in the field of acupuncture, demonstrating that it can offer real and clinically significant relief for patients with knee osteoarthritis, at least in the short term.

Strengths

  • 1Largest and most rigorous acupuncture trial for knee osteoarthritis at that time
  • 2Pre-published protocol and expert consensus
  • 3Very high follow-up rate (97%)
  • 4Credibility assessment of the interventions
  • 5Multiple validated outcomes
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Inability to blind acupuncturists
  • 2Newspaper recruitment may not be representative
  • 3Benefits diminish over time
  • 4Differences between true and sham acupuncture not fully imperceptible
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Knee osteoarthritis represents one of the most frequent challenges in physiatry and rehabilitation practice, and conventional pharmacologic management — NSAIDs, weak opioids, intra-articular injections — frequently runs up against contraindications, especially in older adults with cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. This trial, published in The Lancet, consolidates acupuncture as an adjuvant therapeutic option backed by high-level evidence. The 22.7-point WOMAC difference relative to the no-treatment group, combined with 52% responders showing 50% or greater improvement, defines a clinically relevant effect — not merely statistical. In practice, this means that patients aged 50 to 75 with symptomatic osteoarthritis and limitations on NSAID use constitute a well-founded indication for including acupuncture in the therapeutic plan, preferably integrated with functional knee rehabilitation.

Notable Findings

The most attention-worthy data point is the difference between true and sham acupuncture: 8.8 points on WOMAC, with a nearly doubled responder rate — 52% versus 28%. This makes clear that the effect of acupuncture transcends nonspecific response to the therapeutic ritual, a point that is frequently underestimated in clinical discussions. The control with superficial needling at non-acupuncture points is methodologically sophisticated and makes this distinction particularly robust. Another aspect that deserves attention is the safety profile: adverse effects limited to local bruising, with no serious events, reinforcing the method's feasibility in vulnerable populations. The temporal dynamic of results — maximum benefit at 8 weeks with progressive attenuation — is information that should enter directly into therapeutic planning, indicating the need for a structured maintenance protocol.

From My Experience

In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, I typically observe measurable clinical response in knee osteoarthritis as early as the third or fourth session — reduction on pain scales, improvement in gait tolerance, and reduced demand for rescue analgesia. What this trial confirms is exactly what I see routinely: the effect is real and specific, not merely a product of attention and expectation. I typically work with cycles of 10 to 12 sessions in the acute phase, followed by monthly maintenance sessions, which seems compatible with the response curve described in the study. I usually combine acupuncture with quadriceps and gluteus medius strengthening, since the immediate analgesic effect opens a valuable therapeutic window for functional gain. The profile that responds best in my experience is the patient with predominantly nocturnal pain and moderate morning stiffness, without exuberant acute inflammatory component. Patients with marked varus knee and severe malalignment respond more modestly, and I typically adjust expectations at the first consultation.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Indexed scientific article

This study is indexed in an international scientific database. Check your institutional access to obtain the full article.

CITED IN · 02 PAGES

Condition pages and clinical articles that cite this evidence as the basis of their recommendations.

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.