Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in patients with osteoarthritis pain

Reinhold et al. · European Journal of Health Economics · 2008

🎲Randomized Controlled Trial👥n=489 participants💰Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Evidence Level

STRONG
85/ 100
Quality
4/5
Sample
4/5
Replication
4/5
🎯

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate quality of life, costs, and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture combined with routine care versus routine care alone in patients with osteoarthritis

👥

WHO

489 patients with chronic pain from knee or hip osteoarthritis for more than 6 months

⏱️

DURATION

3 months of treatment with follow-up

📍

POINTS

Points individualized per physician training (A-diploma with 140+ hours)

🔬 Study Design

489participants
randomization

Acupuncture + Routine Care

n=246

10-15 acupuncture sessions plus conventional medical care

Routine Care

n=243

Conventional medical care only (waiting list)

⏱️ Duration: 3 months

📊 Results in numbers

0.0241 QALYs gained

Quality of life improvement

€17,845

Incremental cost per QALY

€469.50

Cost difference

10.6 ± 2.8

Mean number of sessions

📊 Outcome Comparison

SF-36 Physical Component (3 months)

Acupuncture
36.2
Control
31.4

WOMAC Global Score (3 months)

Acupuncture
30.6
Control
46.6
💬 What does this mean for you?

This study showed that acupuncture, when added to conventional medical treatment, significantly improves the quality of life of patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Although the treatment has an additional cost, it is considered economically viable within international healthcare standards.

📝

Article summary

Plain-language narrative summary

This German multicenter study evaluated for the first time the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis, a condition that affects millions of people and represents one of the main causes of disability in Europe. With population aging, the number of patients with osteoarthritis is expected to double over the next 15 years, making the search for effective and economically viable treatments urgent. The research was conducted as part of the ARC (Acupuncture in Routine Care) studies and enrolled 489 patients with chronic pain from knee or hip osteoarthritis, recruited from 255 general clinics in Germany. Participants were aged 40 years or older, with pain for at least 6 months, radiologic evidence of osteoarthritis, and at least 15 days of pain in the month prior to the study.

The methodology used a randomized controlled design, in which patients were allocated to receive immediate acupuncture (intervention group) or acupuncture after 3 months (waiting-list control group). Both groups maintained free access to conventional medical care offered by the German healthcare system. Participating physicians had a minimum of 140 hours of acupuncture training (A-diploma), with most being general practitioners followed by orthopedists. The protocol called for 10-15 acupuncture sessions per patient, reflecting real-world German clinical practice, where variations in acupuncture styles exist according to individual training.

Outcome measures included quality of life assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire, direct and indirect healthcare costs, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Costs were measured from a societal perspective, including acupuncture sessions (€35 each), medical consultations, hospital admissions, and prescription medications. Indirect costs for lost work days were estimated at €78 per day using the human capital approach. Data were obtained through German statutory health insurance funds.

Results demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life for patients treated with acupuncture across virtually all SF-36 dimensions, except for the mental health component, general health perception, and emotional functioning. The most pronounced impact was observed on the SF-36 physical score. The study also used the WOMAC questionnaire, specific for osteoarthritis, confirming the observed benefits. The cost-effectiveness analysis, performed on 421 patients with complete data, revealed a gain of 0.0241 QALYs (quality-adjusted life years) in the acupuncture group.

This benefit was accompanied by additional costs of €469.50, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €17,845 per QALY gained in the overall analysis, and €20,256 in the osteoarthritis-specific analysis. These values are below the hypothetical threshold of €50,000 per QALY adopted in the study, indicating that acupuncture is cost-effective. An important finding was the significant difference between sexes in cost-effectiveness. Women had much more favorable ratios (€15,485 per QALY) compared with men (€282,602 per QALY), especially in cases of knee osteoarthritis.

For hip osteoarthritis, sex differences were less pronounced. Sensitivity analyses explored different scenarios of acupuncture costs (€15-55 per session) and effect durations (1-5 years), confirming the robustness of the main findings. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed approximately 95% probability of cost-effectiveness in women versus 45% in men at different willingness-to-pay thresholds. The study has some important limitations.

The observation period of only 3 months does not allow assessment of long-term economic benefits, although follow-up studies have shown maintenance of effects for at least 6-12 months. Costs included only statutory health insurance data, excluding direct private patient expenditures. The use of SF-36 as the main outcome measure, although validated for osteoarthritis, may generate slightly higher ICERs compared with other instruments. The findings have significant clinical implications, providing the first robust evidence of acupuncture cost-effectiveness in osteoarthritis.

The results influenced health policy decisions in Germany, contributing to the decision by the Federal Joint Committee of Physicians and Health Insurers to include acupuncture as a reimbursable treatment option for knee osteoarthritis pain starting in January 2007.

Strengths

  • 1First cost-effectiveness study of acupuncture in osteoarthritis
  • 2Large multicenter sample (489 patients, 255 clinics)
  • 3Pragmatic design reflecting real clinical practice
  • 4Robust analysis including direct and indirect costs
  • 5Extensive sensitivity analyses confirming findings
⚠️

Limitations

  • 1Short follow-up period (3 months)
  • 2Costs limited to social insurance data (excluding private expenditures)
  • 3Unexplained sex differences in effectiveness
  • 4Small sample size in subgroup analyses
  • 5Possible confounding by uncontrolled factors in the pragmatic design
Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

Expert Commentary

Dr. Marcus Yu Bin Pai

MD, PhD · Pain Medicine · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · Medical Acupuncture

Clinical Relevance

Knee and hip osteoarthritis represent one of the highest-volume musculoskeletal conditions in physiatry and pain services. The question I receive daily from administrators and patients is not whether acupuncture works, but whether it justifies the cost within a structured healthcare system. This work answers exactly that: with an ICER of €17,845 per QALY, acupuncture combined with conventional care falls well below any reasonable cost-effectiveness threshold adopted in developed economies. The pragmatic design, involving 255 clinics and 489 patients with pain for at least 6 months and radiologic confirmation, confers robust external validity. Moreover, the finding served as the basis for the German decision to incorporate acupuncture as a reimbursable benefit for knee osteoarthritis starting in 2007 — a concrete example of how well-constructed evidence moves health policy.

Notable Findings

The gain of 0.0241 QALYs in just 3 months, at an incremental cost of €469.50, is a result that merits attention. The impact concentrated on the physical dimensions of the SF-36 and was corroborated by the WOMAC, an instrument specific to osteoarthritis, which reinforces the consistency of outcomes. The cost-effectiveness divergence between sexes is the most thought-provoking finding: women showed an ICER of €15,485 per QALY, while men reached €282,602. This disparity was especially marked in knee osteoarthritis. The phenomenon still lacks a solid mechanistic explanation but signals that sex may be a relevant effect modifier in selecting treatment candidates. The sensitivity analysis confirming robustness across per-session cost variations from €15 to €55 demonstrates that the findings are not an artifact of local German pricing.

From My Experience

In my practice at the musculoskeletal pain clinic, knee and hip osteoarthritis in women over 55 years old is the profile that responds most consistently and earliest to acupuncture — I typically see functional pain reduction within the first 3 to 4 sessions, which aligns with the female superiority documented here. For this profile, I usually work with 10 to 12 sessions in the acute phase, combining systemic needling with periarticular points and, when there is an associated myofascial component, including dry needling of trigger points in the vastus medialis and gluteus medius. The combination with motor physical therapy and a quadriceps strengthening program is standard in our service — acupuncture reduces pain enough to enable exercise adherence, which sustains the functional gain in the medium term. In men with advanced osteoarthritis and predominantly mechanical nociceptive component, response is usually more modest and the number of sessions to stabilization tends to be greater. In those cases, I reassess the incremental benefit against the patient's opportunity cost before extending the protocol beyond 12 sessions.

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture.

Full original article

Read the full scientific study

European Journal of Health Economics · 2008

DOI: 10.1007/s10198-007-0062-5

Access original article

Scientific Review

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

Marcus Yu Bin Pai, MD, PhD

CRM-SP: 158074 | RQE: 65523 · 65524 · 655241

PhD in Health Sciences, University of São Paulo. Board-certified in Pain Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Medical Acupuncture. Scientific review and curation of every entry in this library.

Learn more about the author →
⚕️

Medical disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis, or treatment by a qualified professional. Some information may be assisted by artificial intelligence and is subject to inaccuracies. Always consult a physician.

Content reviewed by the medical team at CEIMEC — Integrated Centre for Chinese Medicine Studies, a reference in Medical Acupuncture for over 30 years.